Cargando…

Stereoscopic vs. monoscopic photographs on optic disc evaluation and glaucoma diagnosis among general ophthalmologists: A cloud-based real-world multicenter study

PURPOSE: To investigate whether stereoscopic vs. monoscopic viewing condition influences the evaluation of optic disc photographs for morphologic features and glaucoma likelihood in a general ophthalmologist population from multicenters on a cloud-based platform. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Jingyuan, Qu, Yi, Zhao, Jianchun, Cong, Jingwu, Sun, Zixi, Du, Yunfeng, Yang, Gang, Ding, Dayong, Chen, Youxin, Cheng, Gangwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36314022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.990611
_version_ 1784819837527130112
author Yang, Jingyuan
Qu, Yi
Zhao, Jianchun
Cong, Jingwu
Sun, Zixi
Du, Yunfeng
Yang, Gang
Ding, Dayong
Chen, Youxin
Cheng, Gangwei
author_facet Yang, Jingyuan
Qu, Yi
Zhao, Jianchun
Cong, Jingwu
Sun, Zixi
Du, Yunfeng
Yang, Gang
Ding, Dayong
Chen, Youxin
Cheng, Gangwei
author_sort Yang, Jingyuan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate whether stereoscopic vs. monoscopic viewing condition influences the evaluation of optic disc photographs for morphologic features and glaucoma likelihood in a general ophthalmologist population from multicenters on a cloud-based platform. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 519 pairs of stereoscopic and monoscopic photographs of optic discs with adequate quality were selected and presented using a cloud-based platform. A total of 21 general ophthalmologists from 14 centers assessed 15 morphologic features based on 5R's rules and estimated glaucoma likelihood for each assigned photograph. There were 93 pairs of stereoscopic and monoscopic photographs evaluated by a panel of glaucoma specialists and set as ground truth. The main outcome measures were the agreement between estimates and ground truth and the inter-grader agreements. RESULTS: There were good agreements between ground truth and both monoscopic and stereoscopic estimates (stereo κ 0.532 and mono κ 0.494). There was also a substantial intra-grader agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic evaluation of glaucoma likelihood (κ 0.636). In eyes with probable glaucoma, the accuracy of the stereo method was greater than that of the mono method (stereo 0.238 vs. mono 0.118) When compared with ground truth, stereoscopic photographs had a better agreement for disc size (stereo κ 0.447 vs. mono κ 0.183), disc color (stereo κ 0.612 vs. mono κ 0.549), neuroretinal rim shape (stereo κ 0.356 vs. mono κ 0.274) on the whole. The stereoscopic method also had a better inter-grade agreement for disc size, disc color, neuroretinal rim shape, and glaucoma likelihood (stereo κ 0.402 vs. mono κ 0.359) on the whole. CONCLUSIONS: In the evaluation of optic disc photographs for morphologic features and glaucoma likelihood, the stereoscopic method showed superiority compared to the monoscopic method for general ophthalmologists. The stereoscopic method is more likely to identify glaucomatous eyes which need medical intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9612717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96127172022-10-28 Stereoscopic vs. monoscopic photographs on optic disc evaluation and glaucoma diagnosis among general ophthalmologists: A cloud-based real-world multicenter study Yang, Jingyuan Qu, Yi Zhao, Jianchun Cong, Jingwu Sun, Zixi Du, Yunfeng Yang, Gang Ding, Dayong Chen, Youxin Cheng, Gangwei Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: To investigate whether stereoscopic vs. monoscopic viewing condition influences the evaluation of optic disc photographs for morphologic features and glaucoma likelihood in a general ophthalmologist population from multicenters on a cloud-based platform. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 519 pairs of stereoscopic and monoscopic photographs of optic discs with adequate quality were selected and presented using a cloud-based platform. A total of 21 general ophthalmologists from 14 centers assessed 15 morphologic features based on 5R's rules and estimated glaucoma likelihood for each assigned photograph. There were 93 pairs of stereoscopic and monoscopic photographs evaluated by a panel of glaucoma specialists and set as ground truth. The main outcome measures were the agreement between estimates and ground truth and the inter-grader agreements. RESULTS: There were good agreements between ground truth and both monoscopic and stereoscopic estimates (stereo κ 0.532 and mono κ 0.494). There was also a substantial intra-grader agreement between monoscopic and stereoscopic evaluation of glaucoma likelihood (κ 0.636). In eyes with probable glaucoma, the accuracy of the stereo method was greater than that of the mono method (stereo 0.238 vs. mono 0.118) When compared with ground truth, stereoscopic photographs had a better agreement for disc size (stereo κ 0.447 vs. mono κ 0.183), disc color (stereo κ 0.612 vs. mono κ 0.549), neuroretinal rim shape (stereo κ 0.356 vs. mono κ 0.274) on the whole. The stereoscopic method also had a better inter-grade agreement for disc size, disc color, neuroretinal rim shape, and glaucoma likelihood (stereo κ 0.402 vs. mono κ 0.359) on the whole. CONCLUSIONS: In the evaluation of optic disc photographs for morphologic features and glaucoma likelihood, the stereoscopic method showed superiority compared to the monoscopic method for general ophthalmologists. The stereoscopic method is more likely to identify glaucomatous eyes which need medical intervention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9612717/ /pubmed/36314022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.990611 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yang, Qu, Zhao, Cong, Sun, Du, Yang, Ding, Chen and Cheng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Yang, Jingyuan
Qu, Yi
Zhao, Jianchun
Cong, Jingwu
Sun, Zixi
Du, Yunfeng
Yang, Gang
Ding, Dayong
Chen, Youxin
Cheng, Gangwei
Stereoscopic vs. monoscopic photographs on optic disc evaluation and glaucoma diagnosis among general ophthalmologists: A cloud-based real-world multicenter study
title Stereoscopic vs. monoscopic photographs on optic disc evaluation and glaucoma diagnosis among general ophthalmologists: A cloud-based real-world multicenter study
title_full Stereoscopic vs. monoscopic photographs on optic disc evaluation and glaucoma diagnosis among general ophthalmologists: A cloud-based real-world multicenter study
title_fullStr Stereoscopic vs. monoscopic photographs on optic disc evaluation and glaucoma diagnosis among general ophthalmologists: A cloud-based real-world multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Stereoscopic vs. monoscopic photographs on optic disc evaluation and glaucoma diagnosis among general ophthalmologists: A cloud-based real-world multicenter study
title_short Stereoscopic vs. monoscopic photographs on optic disc evaluation and glaucoma diagnosis among general ophthalmologists: A cloud-based real-world multicenter study
title_sort stereoscopic vs. monoscopic photographs on optic disc evaluation and glaucoma diagnosis among general ophthalmologists: a cloud-based real-world multicenter study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36314022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.990611
work_keys_str_mv AT yangjingyuan stereoscopicvsmonoscopicphotographsonopticdiscevaluationandglaucomadiagnosisamonggeneralophthalmologistsacloudbasedrealworldmulticenterstudy
AT quyi stereoscopicvsmonoscopicphotographsonopticdiscevaluationandglaucomadiagnosisamonggeneralophthalmologistsacloudbasedrealworldmulticenterstudy
AT zhaojianchun stereoscopicvsmonoscopicphotographsonopticdiscevaluationandglaucomadiagnosisamonggeneralophthalmologistsacloudbasedrealworldmulticenterstudy
AT congjingwu stereoscopicvsmonoscopicphotographsonopticdiscevaluationandglaucomadiagnosisamonggeneralophthalmologistsacloudbasedrealworldmulticenterstudy
AT sunzixi stereoscopicvsmonoscopicphotographsonopticdiscevaluationandglaucomadiagnosisamonggeneralophthalmologistsacloudbasedrealworldmulticenterstudy
AT duyunfeng stereoscopicvsmonoscopicphotographsonopticdiscevaluationandglaucomadiagnosisamonggeneralophthalmologistsacloudbasedrealworldmulticenterstudy
AT yanggang stereoscopicvsmonoscopicphotographsonopticdiscevaluationandglaucomadiagnosisamonggeneralophthalmologistsacloudbasedrealworldmulticenterstudy
AT dingdayong stereoscopicvsmonoscopicphotographsonopticdiscevaluationandglaucomadiagnosisamonggeneralophthalmologistsacloudbasedrealworldmulticenterstudy
AT chenyouxin stereoscopicvsmonoscopicphotographsonopticdiscevaluationandglaucomadiagnosisamonggeneralophthalmologistsacloudbasedrealworldmulticenterstudy
AT chenggangwei stereoscopicvsmonoscopicphotographsonopticdiscevaluationandglaucomadiagnosisamonggeneralophthalmologistsacloudbasedrealworldmulticenterstudy