Cargando…
Postauricular Incision Versus Conventional Transcervical Incision in Second Branchial Cleft Cyst Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Surgical removal is the treatment of choice for second branchial cleft cysts (SBCCs), which are congenital anomalies. The conventional procedure is performed through a transcervical approach, which would lead to a visible scar in the anterior neck. Conversely, the postauricular approach could keep t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35882056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008741 |
_version_ | 1784819839570804736 |
---|---|
author | Ho, Che-Fang Yang, Tsung-Han Hsin, Li-Jen Yang, Shih-Wei Tsai, Yao-Te Tsai, Ming-Shao Yang, Cheng-Ta Lee, Yi-Chan |
author_facet | Ho, Che-Fang Yang, Tsung-Han Hsin, Li-Jen Yang, Shih-Wei Tsai, Yao-Te Tsai, Ming-Shao Yang, Cheng-Ta Lee, Yi-Chan |
author_sort | Ho, Che-Fang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Surgical removal is the treatment of choice for second branchial cleft cysts (SBCCs), which are congenital anomalies. The conventional procedure is performed through a transcervical approach, which would lead to a visible scar in the anterior neck. Conversely, the postauricular approach could keep the scar in the hairline or retroauricular sulcus, rendering it almost invisible after the surgery. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the differences between the postauricular and conventional transcervical approaches to SBCC excision. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies comparing outcomes of SBCC surgery via postauricular and conventional transcervical approaches. The data of interest were analyzed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 3). The data of interest were analyzed by calculating the risk difference (RD), the standardized mean difference, and the mean difference (MD) with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Three studies were eligible for the final analysis. The pooled analysis demonstrated that the cosmetic satisfaction score was significantly higher with the postauricular approach (standardized mean difference, 2.12; 95% CI, 0.68–3.56). The operative duration was significantly longer with the postauricular approach than with the conventional transcervical approach (MD, 12.81; 95% CI, 2.39–23.23). The incidences of postoperative marginal mandibular nerve palsy (RD, 0.00; 95% CI, −0.09 to 0.09), bleeding complications (RD, −0.02; 95% CI, −0.09 to 0.05), salivary complications (RD, −0.00; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.06), cyst size (MD, 0.02; 95% CI, −0.96–0.99), and length of hospital stay (MD, −2.50; CI, −7.30 to 2.30) were comparable between the 2 groups. The postauricular approach is feasible for use in SBCC excision and yields better cosmetic outcomes, a longer operative duration, and a similar rate of complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9612730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96127302022-11-04 Postauricular Incision Versus Conventional Transcervical Incision in Second Branchial Cleft Cyst Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Ho, Che-Fang Yang, Tsung-Han Hsin, Li-Jen Yang, Shih-Wei Tsai, Yao-Te Tsai, Ming-Shao Yang, Cheng-Ta Lee, Yi-Chan J Craniofac Surg Original Articles Surgical removal is the treatment of choice for second branchial cleft cysts (SBCCs), which are congenital anomalies. The conventional procedure is performed through a transcervical approach, which would lead to a visible scar in the anterior neck. Conversely, the postauricular approach could keep the scar in the hairline or retroauricular sulcus, rendering it almost invisible after the surgery. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the differences between the postauricular and conventional transcervical approaches to SBCC excision. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies comparing outcomes of SBCC surgery via postauricular and conventional transcervical approaches. The data of interest were analyzed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 3). The data of interest were analyzed by calculating the risk difference (RD), the standardized mean difference, and the mean difference (MD) with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Three studies were eligible for the final analysis. The pooled analysis demonstrated that the cosmetic satisfaction score was significantly higher with the postauricular approach (standardized mean difference, 2.12; 95% CI, 0.68–3.56). The operative duration was significantly longer with the postauricular approach than with the conventional transcervical approach (MD, 12.81; 95% CI, 2.39–23.23). The incidences of postoperative marginal mandibular nerve palsy (RD, 0.00; 95% CI, −0.09 to 0.09), bleeding complications (RD, −0.02; 95% CI, −0.09 to 0.05), salivary complications (RD, −0.00; 95% CI, −0.07 to 0.06), cyst size (MD, 0.02; 95% CI, −0.96–0.99), and length of hospital stay (MD, −2.50; CI, −7.30 to 2.30) were comparable between the 2 groups. The postauricular approach is feasible for use in SBCC excision and yields better cosmetic outcomes, a longer operative duration, and a similar rate of complications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022 2022-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9612730/ /pubmed/35882056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008741 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of Mutaz B. Habal, MD. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ho, Che-Fang Yang, Tsung-Han Hsin, Li-Jen Yang, Shih-Wei Tsai, Yao-Te Tsai, Ming-Shao Yang, Cheng-Ta Lee, Yi-Chan Postauricular Incision Versus Conventional Transcervical Incision in Second Branchial Cleft Cyst Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Postauricular Incision Versus Conventional Transcervical Incision in Second Branchial Cleft Cyst Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Postauricular Incision Versus Conventional Transcervical Incision in Second Branchial Cleft Cyst Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Postauricular Incision Versus Conventional Transcervical Incision in Second Branchial Cleft Cyst Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Postauricular Incision Versus Conventional Transcervical Incision in Second Branchial Cleft Cyst Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Postauricular Incision Versus Conventional Transcervical Incision in Second Branchial Cleft Cyst Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | postauricular incision versus conventional transcervical incision in second branchial cleft cyst excision: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35882056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008741 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hochefang postauricularincisionversusconventionaltranscervicalincisioninsecondbranchialcleftcystexcisionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangtsunghan postauricularincisionversusconventionaltranscervicalincisioninsecondbranchialcleftcystexcisionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hsinlijen postauricularincisionversusconventionaltranscervicalincisioninsecondbranchialcleftcystexcisionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangshihwei postauricularincisionversusconventionaltranscervicalincisioninsecondbranchialcleftcystexcisionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tsaiyaote postauricularincisionversusconventionaltranscervicalincisioninsecondbranchialcleftcystexcisionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tsaimingshao postauricularincisionversusconventionaltranscervicalincisioninsecondbranchialcleftcystexcisionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yangchengta postauricularincisionversusconventionaltranscervicalincisioninsecondbranchialcleftcystexcisionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leeyichan postauricularincisionversusconventionaltranscervicalincisioninsecondbranchialcleftcystexcisionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |