Cargando…

Peri-operative outcomes between primary and replacement artificial urinary sphincter surgery: An ACS-NSQIP analysis

Objective: To evaluate differences in perioperative clinical outcomes in men undergoing artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in primary versus replacement settings. Secondarily, we aimed to identify patient-related factors contributing to complications associated with AUS placement. Mater...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jella, Tarun, Fernstrum, Austin, Callegari, Michael, Cwalina, Tom, Mundey, Wade, Mahran, Amr, Petrinic, Benjamin, Ray, Al, Elghalban, Heba, Abdelrazek, Mostafa, Loeb, Aram, Thirumavalavan, Nannan, Gupta, Shubham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Journal of Urology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118981
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2021.21204
_version_ 1784819844377477120
author Jella, Tarun
Fernstrum, Austin
Callegari, Michael
Cwalina, Tom
Mundey, Wade
Mahran, Amr
Petrinic, Benjamin
Ray, Al
Elghalban, Heba
Abdelrazek, Mostafa
Loeb, Aram
Thirumavalavan, Nannan
Gupta, Shubham
author_facet Jella, Tarun
Fernstrum, Austin
Callegari, Michael
Cwalina, Tom
Mundey, Wade
Mahran, Amr
Petrinic, Benjamin
Ray, Al
Elghalban, Heba
Abdelrazek, Mostafa
Loeb, Aram
Thirumavalavan, Nannan
Gupta, Shubham
author_sort Jella, Tarun
collection PubMed
description Objective: To evaluate differences in perioperative clinical outcomes in men undergoing artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in primary versus replacement settings. Secondarily, we aimed to identify patient-related factors contributing to complications associated with AUS placement. Materials and Methods: A review of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was performed between 2010 and 2018 identifying males undergoing AUS implantation. Subjects were further subdivided into primary implantation or removal/replacement of AUS simultaneously via current procedural terminology codes 53445 and 53447, respectively. 30-Day postoperative outcomes were compared between cohorts using t-test and Fisher’s exact test. The relationship between patient factors and complications was evaluated using logistic regression. Results: A total of 1,892 patients were identified: 1,445 primary AUS placement and 447 AUS replacement procedures. Patients undergoing AUS replacement were statistically older than those undergoing primary implantation (71.4 vs 69.7 years, P < .001). AUS replacement procedures were associated with an increased rate of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) compared to primary procedures (1.3% vs 0.4%, P = .042). There were no differences identified between cohorts for deep SSI, cardiopulmonary complications, reoperation, operative time, or length of stay. Logistic regression demonstrated that higher body mass index was found to be independent risk factors for any complications, and diabetes mellitus was associated with increased risk of AUS-related readmission. Conclusion: Within the perioperative period, patients undergoing replacement AUS have an increased risk of superficial SSI compared to primary AUS implantation. These findings can assist with appropriate perioperative counseling of patients undergoing primary and replacement AUS implantations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9612775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Turkish Journal of Urology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96127752022-11-04 Peri-operative outcomes between primary and replacement artificial urinary sphincter surgery: An ACS-NSQIP analysis Jella, Tarun Fernstrum, Austin Callegari, Michael Cwalina, Tom Mundey, Wade Mahran, Amr Petrinic, Benjamin Ray, Al Elghalban, Heba Abdelrazek, Mostafa Loeb, Aram Thirumavalavan, Nannan Gupta, Shubham Turk J Urol Original Articles Objective: To evaluate differences in perioperative clinical outcomes in men undergoing artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in primary versus replacement settings. Secondarily, we aimed to identify patient-related factors contributing to complications associated with AUS placement. Materials and Methods: A review of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was performed between 2010 and 2018 identifying males undergoing AUS implantation. Subjects were further subdivided into primary implantation or removal/replacement of AUS simultaneously via current procedural terminology codes 53445 and 53447, respectively. 30-Day postoperative outcomes were compared between cohorts using t-test and Fisher’s exact test. The relationship between patient factors and complications was evaluated using logistic regression. Results: A total of 1,892 patients were identified: 1,445 primary AUS placement and 447 AUS replacement procedures. Patients undergoing AUS replacement were statistically older than those undergoing primary implantation (71.4 vs 69.7 years, P < .001). AUS replacement procedures were associated with an increased rate of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) compared to primary procedures (1.3% vs 0.4%, P = .042). There were no differences identified between cohorts for deep SSI, cardiopulmonary complications, reoperation, operative time, or length of stay. Logistic regression demonstrated that higher body mass index was found to be independent risk factors for any complications, and diabetes mellitus was associated with increased risk of AUS-related readmission. Conclusion: Within the perioperative period, patients undergoing replacement AUS have an increased risk of superficial SSI compared to primary AUS implantation. These findings can assist with appropriate perioperative counseling of patients undergoing primary and replacement AUS implantations. Turkish Journal of Urology 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9612775/ /pubmed/35118981 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2021.21204 Text en © Copyright 2021 by Turkish Association of Urology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jella, Tarun
Fernstrum, Austin
Callegari, Michael
Cwalina, Tom
Mundey, Wade
Mahran, Amr
Petrinic, Benjamin
Ray, Al
Elghalban, Heba
Abdelrazek, Mostafa
Loeb, Aram
Thirumavalavan, Nannan
Gupta, Shubham
Peri-operative outcomes between primary and replacement artificial urinary sphincter surgery: An ACS-NSQIP analysis
title Peri-operative outcomes between primary and replacement artificial urinary sphincter surgery: An ACS-NSQIP analysis
title_full Peri-operative outcomes between primary and replacement artificial urinary sphincter surgery: An ACS-NSQIP analysis
title_fullStr Peri-operative outcomes between primary and replacement artificial urinary sphincter surgery: An ACS-NSQIP analysis
title_full_unstemmed Peri-operative outcomes between primary and replacement artificial urinary sphincter surgery: An ACS-NSQIP analysis
title_short Peri-operative outcomes between primary and replacement artificial urinary sphincter surgery: An ACS-NSQIP analysis
title_sort peri-operative outcomes between primary and replacement artificial urinary sphincter surgery: an acs-nsqip analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35118981
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2021.21204
work_keys_str_mv AT jellatarun perioperativeoutcomesbetweenprimaryandreplacementartificialurinarysphinctersurgeryanacsnsqipanalysis
AT fernstrumaustin perioperativeoutcomesbetweenprimaryandreplacementartificialurinarysphinctersurgeryanacsnsqipanalysis
AT callegarimichael perioperativeoutcomesbetweenprimaryandreplacementartificialurinarysphinctersurgeryanacsnsqipanalysis
AT cwalinatom perioperativeoutcomesbetweenprimaryandreplacementartificialurinarysphinctersurgeryanacsnsqipanalysis
AT mundeywade perioperativeoutcomesbetweenprimaryandreplacementartificialurinarysphinctersurgeryanacsnsqipanalysis
AT mahranamr perioperativeoutcomesbetweenprimaryandreplacementartificialurinarysphinctersurgeryanacsnsqipanalysis
AT petrinicbenjamin perioperativeoutcomesbetweenprimaryandreplacementartificialurinarysphinctersurgeryanacsnsqipanalysis
AT rayal perioperativeoutcomesbetweenprimaryandreplacementartificialurinarysphinctersurgeryanacsnsqipanalysis
AT elghalbanheba perioperativeoutcomesbetweenprimaryandreplacementartificialurinarysphinctersurgeryanacsnsqipanalysis
AT abdelrazekmostafa perioperativeoutcomesbetweenprimaryandreplacementartificialurinarysphinctersurgeryanacsnsqipanalysis
AT loebaram perioperativeoutcomesbetweenprimaryandreplacementartificialurinarysphinctersurgeryanacsnsqipanalysis
AT thirumavalavannannan perioperativeoutcomesbetweenprimaryandreplacementartificialurinarysphinctersurgeryanacsnsqipanalysis
AT guptashubham perioperativeoutcomesbetweenprimaryandreplacementartificialurinarysphinctersurgeryanacsnsqipanalysis