Cargando…

The impact of COVID-19 on O&G trainees; where are we now?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Obstetrics and Gynaecology (O&G) training continues to face challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in gynaecological surgical training. This follow-up survey captures the ongoing effect on O&G trainees and highlights the future recovery plan consi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duggan, I, Hablase, R, Beard, L, Odejinmi, F, Mallick, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universa Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35373550
http://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.14.1.007
_version_ 1784819857241407488
author Duggan, I
Hablase, R
Beard, L
Odejinmi, F
Mallick, R
author_facet Duggan, I
Hablase, R
Beard, L
Odejinmi, F
Mallick, R
author_sort Duggan, I
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Obstetrics and Gynaecology (O&G) training continues to face challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in gynaecological surgical training. This follow-up survey captures the ongoing effect on O&G trainees and highlights the future recovery plan considering the historical training gaps in benign gynaecology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: an anonymised survey was emailed to all O&G trainees in Kent, Surrey and Sussex (KSS). Responses were collected over 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: 53% of trainees responded. In total, 78% of trainees agreed that the pandemic had an ongoing negative effect on their physical and mental wellbeing respectively. Trainees felt the prior negative impact on obstetric training is improving, whilst 88% still experience a negative impact on their gynaecology surgical training despite the resumption of elective services in the National Health Service (NHS). 80% continue to feel the negative impact on their educational activities and 88% felt their overall training continues to be negatively impacted. 70% were positive that they would recover from this. Responses were representative of each training year. Interestingly, 95% of trainees had accepted the COVID vaccine. CONCLUSION: despite “restoration” of normal services, the negative impact on trainees particularly benign gynaecology surgical training continues. Addressing pre-pandemic training gaps whilst tackling the surgical back- log and the needs of service provision will continue for years to follow. WHAT IS NEW? Future training needs to incorporate creative ways of acquiring surgical skills. It is imperative to imbed simulation training into O&G training programmes. Pastoral support is key to ensure trainees’ mental and physical well-being are prioritised and the already high burn-out rates do not worsen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9612854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Universa Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96128542022-10-28 The impact of COVID-19 on O&G trainees; where are we now? Duggan, I Hablase, R Beard, L Odejinmi, F Mallick, R Facts Views Vis Obgyn Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Obstetrics and Gynaecology (O&G) training continues to face challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in gynaecological surgical training. This follow-up survey captures the ongoing effect on O&G trainees and highlights the future recovery plan considering the historical training gaps in benign gynaecology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: an anonymised survey was emailed to all O&G trainees in Kent, Surrey and Sussex (KSS). Responses were collected over 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: 53% of trainees responded. In total, 78% of trainees agreed that the pandemic had an ongoing negative effect on their physical and mental wellbeing respectively. Trainees felt the prior negative impact on obstetric training is improving, whilst 88% still experience a negative impact on their gynaecology surgical training despite the resumption of elective services in the National Health Service (NHS). 80% continue to feel the negative impact on their educational activities and 88% felt their overall training continues to be negatively impacted. 70% were positive that they would recover from this. Responses were representative of each training year. Interestingly, 95% of trainees had accepted the COVID vaccine. CONCLUSION: despite “restoration” of normal services, the negative impact on trainees particularly benign gynaecology surgical training continues. Addressing pre-pandemic training gaps whilst tackling the surgical back- log and the needs of service provision will continue for years to follow. WHAT IS NEW? Future training needs to incorporate creative ways of acquiring surgical skills. It is imperative to imbed simulation training into O&G training programmes. Pastoral support is key to ensure trainees’ mental and physical well-being are prioritised and the already high burn-out rates do not worsen. Universa Press 2022-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9612854/ /pubmed/35373550 http://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.14.1.007 Text en Copyright © 2022 Facts, Views & Vision https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Duggan, I
Hablase, R
Beard, L
Odejinmi, F
Mallick, R
The impact of COVID-19 on O&G trainees; where are we now?
title The impact of COVID-19 on O&G trainees; where are we now?
title_full The impact of COVID-19 on O&G trainees; where are we now?
title_fullStr The impact of COVID-19 on O&G trainees; where are we now?
title_full_unstemmed The impact of COVID-19 on O&G trainees; where are we now?
title_short The impact of COVID-19 on O&G trainees; where are we now?
title_sort impact of covid-19 on o&g trainees; where are we now?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35373550
http://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.14.1.007
work_keys_str_mv AT duggani theimpactofcovid19onogtraineeswherearewenow
AT hablaser theimpactofcovid19onogtraineeswherearewenow
AT beardl theimpactofcovid19onogtraineeswherearewenow
AT odejinmif theimpactofcovid19onogtraineeswherearewenow
AT mallickr theimpactofcovid19onogtraineeswherearewenow
AT duggani impactofcovid19onogtraineeswherearewenow
AT hablaser impactofcovid19onogtraineeswherearewenow
AT beardl impactofcovid19onogtraineeswherearewenow
AT odejinmif impactofcovid19onogtraineeswherearewenow
AT mallickr impactofcovid19onogtraineeswherearewenow