Cargando…

A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)

PURPOSE: This paper presents a review of the existing qualitative research literature concerning people’s experience of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). The aims of conducting this review were to find out more about the values and outcomes that are important to p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Broomfield, Katherine, Harrop, Deborah, Jones, Georgina L., Sage, Karen, Judge, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36026563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2105961
_version_ 1784819877061591040
author Broomfield, Katherine
Harrop, Deborah
Jones, Georgina L.
Sage, Karen
Judge, Simon
author_facet Broomfield, Katherine
Harrop, Deborah
Jones, Georgina L.
Sage, Karen
Judge, Simon
author_sort Broomfield, Katherine
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This paper presents a review of the existing qualitative research literature concerning people’s experience of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). The aims of conducting this review were to find out more about the values and outcomes that are important to people about the AAC they use to support their communication. This review was conducted to provide a deeper understanding of these experiences to inform the development of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative evidence synthesis of existing qualitative research literature was undertaken to explore and appraise current knowledge about the experiences of people who use AAC. RESULTS: From 115 qualitative research reports 19 papers were identified that responded directly to the research question and aims of the review. Data were identified that could be organized within an a priori framework consisting of the constructs of values, outcomes, and context. CONCLUSION: The review has resulted in a deeper, analytical understanding of the experiences of people who require AAC. The results indicate a set of concepts that can be used to inform the development of a PROM. A PROM can be used to assist clinicians and researchers to better understand the perspectives of people who require AAC and evaluate interventions. The results also encourage professionals to reconsider the terminology and methods used when working alongside people who require AAC and to reflect on the multidimensional factors that influence people’s experience of communication. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be useful tools to support clinician-patient communication, facilitate shared decision making and establish priorities for rehabilitation. It can be difficult to engage people who have complex communication difficulties in decisions about the important outcomes to them from using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). This qualitative evidence synthesis provides a deeper understanding of the experiences and perspectives of people who use AAC. The results will be used to inform the development of a PROM which can be used to facilitate shared decision-making, and evaluate AAC interventions from the perspective of the people who use these technologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9612935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96129352022-10-28 A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) Broomfield, Katherine Harrop, Deborah Jones, Georgina L. Sage, Karen Judge, Simon Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol Review PURPOSE: This paper presents a review of the existing qualitative research literature concerning people’s experience of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). The aims of conducting this review were to find out more about the values and outcomes that are important to people about the AAC they use to support their communication. This review was conducted to provide a deeper understanding of these experiences to inform the development of a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative evidence synthesis of existing qualitative research literature was undertaken to explore and appraise current knowledge about the experiences of people who use AAC. RESULTS: From 115 qualitative research reports 19 papers were identified that responded directly to the research question and aims of the review. Data were identified that could be organized within an a priori framework consisting of the constructs of values, outcomes, and context. CONCLUSION: The review has resulted in a deeper, analytical understanding of the experiences of people who require AAC. The results indicate a set of concepts that can be used to inform the development of a PROM. A PROM can be used to assist clinicians and researchers to better understand the perspectives of people who require AAC and evaluate interventions. The results also encourage professionals to reconsider the terminology and methods used when working alongside people who require AAC and to reflect on the multidimensional factors that influence people’s experience of communication. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be useful tools to support clinician-patient communication, facilitate shared decision making and establish priorities for rehabilitation. It can be difficult to engage people who have complex communication difficulties in decisions about the important outcomes to them from using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). This qualitative evidence synthesis provides a deeper understanding of the experiences and perspectives of people who use AAC. The results will be used to inform the development of a PROM which can be used to facilitate shared decision-making, and evaluate AAC interventions from the perspective of the people who use these technologies. Taylor & Francis 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9612935/ /pubmed/36026563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2105961 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Broomfield, Katherine
Harrop, Deborah
Jones, Georgina L.
Sage, Karen
Judge, Simon
A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)
title A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)
title_full A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)
title_fullStr A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)
title_short A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)
title_sort qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (aac)
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9612935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36026563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2105961
work_keys_str_mv AT broomfieldkatherine aqualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheexperiencesandperspectivesofcommunicatingusingaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationaac
AT harropdeborah aqualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheexperiencesandperspectivesofcommunicatingusingaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationaac
AT jonesgeorginal aqualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheexperiencesandperspectivesofcommunicatingusingaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationaac
AT sagekaren aqualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheexperiencesandperspectivesofcommunicatingusingaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationaac
AT judgesimon aqualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheexperiencesandperspectivesofcommunicatingusingaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationaac
AT broomfieldkatherine qualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheexperiencesandperspectivesofcommunicatingusingaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationaac
AT harropdeborah qualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheexperiencesandperspectivesofcommunicatingusingaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationaac
AT jonesgeorginal qualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheexperiencesandperspectivesofcommunicatingusingaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationaac
AT sagekaren qualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheexperiencesandperspectivesofcommunicatingusingaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationaac
AT judgesimon qualitativeevidencesynthesisoftheexperiencesandperspectivesofcommunicatingusingaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationaac