Cargando…
Current strategies to induce selective killing of HIV‐1‐infected cells
Although combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) has led to significant HIV‐1 suppression and improvement in immune function, persistent viral reservoirs remain that are refractory to intensified ART. ART poses many challenges such as adherence to drug regimens, the emergence of resistant virus, an...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9613504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35707952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JLB.4MR0422-636R |
_version_ | 1784820006560727040 |
---|---|
author | Campbell, Grant R. Spector, Stephen A. |
author_facet | Campbell, Grant R. Spector, Stephen A. |
author_sort | Campbell, Grant R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) has led to significant HIV‐1 suppression and improvement in immune function, persistent viral reservoirs remain that are refractory to intensified ART. ART poses many challenges such as adherence to drug regimens, the emergence of resistant virus, and cumulative toxicity resulting from long‐term therapy. Moreover, latent HIV‐1 reservoir cells can be stochastically activated to produce viral particles despite effective ART and contribute to the rapid viral rebound that typically occurs within 2 weeks of ART interruption; thus, lifelong ART is required for continued viral suppression. Several strategies have been proposed to address the HIV‐1 reservoir such as reactivation of HIV‐1 transcription using latency reactivating agents with a combination of ART, host immune clearance and HIV‐1‐cytotoxicity to purge the infected cells—a “shock and kill” strategy. However, these approaches do not take into account the multiple transcriptional and translational blocks that contribute to HIV‐1 latency or the complex heterogeneity of the HIV‐1 reservoir, and clinical trials have thus far failed to produce the desired results. Here, we describe alternative strategies being pursued that are designed to kill selectively HIV‐1‐infected cells while sparing uninfected cells in the absence of enhanced humoral or adaptive immune responses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9613504 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96135042022-12-30 Current strategies to induce selective killing of HIV‐1‐infected cells Campbell, Grant R. Spector, Stephen A. J Leukoc Biol Meeting: Targeted Science Issue ‐ Macrophage Infection by HIV 2021 Although combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) has led to significant HIV‐1 suppression and improvement in immune function, persistent viral reservoirs remain that are refractory to intensified ART. ART poses many challenges such as adherence to drug regimens, the emergence of resistant virus, and cumulative toxicity resulting from long‐term therapy. Moreover, latent HIV‐1 reservoir cells can be stochastically activated to produce viral particles despite effective ART and contribute to the rapid viral rebound that typically occurs within 2 weeks of ART interruption; thus, lifelong ART is required for continued viral suppression. Several strategies have been proposed to address the HIV‐1 reservoir such as reactivation of HIV‐1 transcription using latency reactivating agents with a combination of ART, host immune clearance and HIV‐1‐cytotoxicity to purge the infected cells—a “shock and kill” strategy. However, these approaches do not take into account the multiple transcriptional and translational blocks that contribute to HIV‐1 latency or the complex heterogeneity of the HIV‐1 reservoir, and clinical trials have thus far failed to produce the desired results. Here, we describe alternative strategies being pursued that are designed to kill selectively HIV‐1‐infected cells while sparing uninfected cells in the absence of enhanced humoral or adaptive immune responses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-16 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9613504/ /pubmed/35707952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JLB.4MR0422-636R Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Leukocyte Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Leukocyte Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Meeting: Targeted Science Issue ‐ Macrophage Infection by HIV 2021 Campbell, Grant R. Spector, Stephen A. Current strategies to induce selective killing of HIV‐1‐infected cells |
title | Current strategies to induce selective killing of HIV‐1‐infected cells |
title_full | Current strategies to induce selective killing of HIV‐1‐infected cells |
title_fullStr | Current strategies to induce selective killing of HIV‐1‐infected cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Current strategies to induce selective killing of HIV‐1‐infected cells |
title_short | Current strategies to induce selective killing of HIV‐1‐infected cells |
title_sort | current strategies to induce selective killing of hiv‐1‐infected cells |
topic | Meeting: Targeted Science Issue ‐ Macrophage Infection by HIV 2021 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9613504/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35707952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/JLB.4MR0422-636R |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campbellgrantr currentstrategiestoinduceselectivekillingofhiv1infectedcells AT spectorstephena currentstrategiestoinduceselectivekillingofhiv1infectedcells |