Cargando…

Determination of hair cortisol in horses: comparison of immunoassay vs LC-HRMS/MS

The measure of hair cortisol concentration (HCC) is becoming an emerging approach to monitor mid-/long-term stress in animals, so it is more and more important to develop accurate and reliable methods. In the light of this, the aim of the present study was to compare mane HCCs of 47 horses with diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saluti, Giorgio, Ricci, Matteo, Castellani, Federica, Colagrande, Maria Novella, Di Bari, Gabriella, Vulpiani, Michele Podaliri, Cerasoli, Francesco, Savini, Giovanni, Scortichini, Giampiero, D’Alterio, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9613578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04343-6
_version_ 1784820014241546240
author Saluti, Giorgio
Ricci, Matteo
Castellani, Federica
Colagrande, Maria Novella
Di Bari, Gabriella
Vulpiani, Michele Podaliri
Cerasoli, Francesco
Savini, Giovanni
Scortichini, Giampiero
D’Alterio, Nicola
author_facet Saluti, Giorgio
Ricci, Matteo
Castellani, Federica
Colagrande, Maria Novella
Di Bari, Gabriella
Vulpiani, Michele Podaliri
Cerasoli, Francesco
Savini, Giovanni
Scortichini, Giampiero
D’Alterio, Nicola
author_sort Saluti, Giorgio
collection PubMed
description The measure of hair cortisol concentration (HCC) is becoming an emerging approach to monitor mid-/long-term stress in animals, so it is more and more important to develop accurate and reliable methods. In the light of this, the aim of the present study was to compare mane HCCs of 47 horses with different managements, by means of an immunoassay (ELISA) and liquid chromatography coupled to hybrid high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS). After the washing step, the ground hair was extracted with methanol. The extract was evaporated and redissolved in two different aqueous solutions, depending on the detection technique. The methods were validated according to EMA guideline for bioanalytical method validation, in the range 2–50 pg mg(−1) (ELISA) and 1–100 pg mg(−1) (LC-HRMS/MS). Satisfactory quantitative performances were obtained for both of the approaches, but this latter demonstrated better precision. The detected concentrations in real samples were encompassing the range 1.3–8.8 pg mg(−1) and 2.0–17.9 pg mg(−1) by means of LC-HRMS/MS and ELISA, respectively. Overall, HCCs measured with ELISA technique were 1.6 times higher. The overestimation of immunoassay results might be caused by cross-reactivity phenomena of laboratory reagents and other structurally similar hormones present in the mane. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-022-04343-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9613578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96135782022-10-29 Determination of hair cortisol in horses: comparison of immunoassay vs LC-HRMS/MS Saluti, Giorgio Ricci, Matteo Castellani, Federica Colagrande, Maria Novella Di Bari, Gabriella Vulpiani, Michele Podaliri Cerasoli, Francesco Savini, Giovanni Scortichini, Giampiero D’Alterio, Nicola Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper The measure of hair cortisol concentration (HCC) is becoming an emerging approach to monitor mid-/long-term stress in animals, so it is more and more important to develop accurate and reliable methods. In the light of this, the aim of the present study was to compare mane HCCs of 47 horses with different managements, by means of an immunoassay (ELISA) and liquid chromatography coupled to hybrid high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS). After the washing step, the ground hair was extracted with methanol. The extract was evaporated and redissolved in two different aqueous solutions, depending on the detection technique. The methods were validated according to EMA guideline for bioanalytical method validation, in the range 2–50 pg mg(−1) (ELISA) and 1–100 pg mg(−1) (LC-HRMS/MS). Satisfactory quantitative performances were obtained for both of the approaches, but this latter demonstrated better precision. The detected concentrations in real samples were encompassing the range 1.3–8.8 pg mg(−1) and 2.0–17.9 pg mg(−1) by means of LC-HRMS/MS and ELISA, respectively. Overall, HCCs measured with ELISA technique were 1.6 times higher. The overestimation of immunoassay results might be caused by cross-reactivity phenomena of laboratory reagents and other structurally similar hormones present in the mane. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-022-04343-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9613578/ /pubmed/36136115 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04343-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Paper
Saluti, Giorgio
Ricci, Matteo
Castellani, Federica
Colagrande, Maria Novella
Di Bari, Gabriella
Vulpiani, Michele Podaliri
Cerasoli, Francesco
Savini, Giovanni
Scortichini, Giampiero
D’Alterio, Nicola
Determination of hair cortisol in horses: comparison of immunoassay vs LC-HRMS/MS
title Determination of hair cortisol in horses: comparison of immunoassay vs LC-HRMS/MS
title_full Determination of hair cortisol in horses: comparison of immunoassay vs LC-HRMS/MS
title_fullStr Determination of hair cortisol in horses: comparison of immunoassay vs LC-HRMS/MS
title_full_unstemmed Determination of hair cortisol in horses: comparison of immunoassay vs LC-HRMS/MS
title_short Determination of hair cortisol in horses: comparison of immunoassay vs LC-HRMS/MS
title_sort determination of hair cortisol in horses: comparison of immunoassay vs lc-hrms/ms
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9613578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36136115
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04343-6
work_keys_str_mv AT salutigiorgio determinationofhaircortisolinhorsescomparisonofimmunoassayvslchrmsms
AT riccimatteo determinationofhaircortisolinhorsescomparisonofimmunoassayvslchrmsms
AT castellanifederica determinationofhaircortisolinhorsescomparisonofimmunoassayvslchrmsms
AT colagrandemarianovella determinationofhaircortisolinhorsescomparisonofimmunoassayvslchrmsms
AT dibarigabriella determinationofhaircortisolinhorsescomparisonofimmunoassayvslchrmsms
AT vulpianimichelepodaliri determinationofhaircortisolinhorsescomparisonofimmunoassayvslchrmsms
AT cerasolifrancesco determinationofhaircortisolinhorsescomparisonofimmunoassayvslchrmsms
AT savinigiovanni determinationofhaircortisolinhorsescomparisonofimmunoassayvslchrmsms
AT scortichinigiampiero determinationofhaircortisolinhorsescomparisonofimmunoassayvslchrmsms
AT dalterionicola determinationofhaircortisolinhorsescomparisonofimmunoassayvslchrmsms