Cargando…
Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing
Background: Over-testing for Clostridioides difficile infection outside acute diarrheal illness without a clear alternative cause can lead to inappropriate diagnosis and treatment with antibiotic therapy. Preanalytical interventions such as education, order restriction, and electronic order assistan...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614800/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.109 |
_version_ | 1784820273068900352 |
---|---|
author | Tassone, Daniel Hitchcock, Matthew Markley, John Stevens, Michael |
author_facet | Tassone, Daniel Hitchcock, Matthew Markley, John Stevens, Michael |
author_sort | Tassone, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Over-testing for Clostridioides difficile infection outside acute diarrheal illness without a clear alternative cause can lead to inappropriate diagnosis and treatment with antibiotic therapy. Preanalytical interventions such as education, order restriction, and electronic order assistance are common but are limited in effectiveness. As an alternative approach, our antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) implemented prospective audit and feedback (PAF) on C. difficile PCR orders to reduce inappropriate testing. Methods: The study was conducted at a 399-bed, tertiary-care, Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center and included adult inpatients and outpatients for whom C. difficile PCR testing was ordered. In the preintervention period from June through September 2019, the ASP was alerted to C. difficile PCR tests and collected data but did not intervene. From October 2019 to January 2020, the ASP performed real-time PAF at the time of ordering. Appropriateness of testing was determined based on whether there was a negative result in the prior 7 days and a 3-step review of clinical factors (Fig. 1). When possible, a direct conversation took place with the ordering provider. If not possible, a general note delineating appropriate clinical criteria for testing was generated. No PAF was done outside standard hours. The ASP recommended cancelling tests deemed inappropriate. Monthly test rates during the pre- and postintervention periods were compared using the Student t test with α = .05, and test appropriateness was compared using the χ(2) test. All analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel software. Results: During the preintervention period, a total of 418 tests were ordered (104.5 per month). This number decreased to 276 (69 per month) during the intervention period. (p Conclusions: Direct PAF at the time of C. difficile PCR ordering may increase test appropriateness and is associated with a reduction in overall testing, primarily by reducing the number of tests that are considered not appropriate on clinical grounds. PAF is effective but requires significant time investment by ASP staff and may not be a sustainable intervention over time. Funding: None Disclosures: None |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9614800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96148002022-10-29 Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing Tassone, Daniel Hitchcock, Matthew Markley, John Stevens, Michael Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol C. difficile Background: Over-testing for Clostridioides difficile infection outside acute diarrheal illness without a clear alternative cause can lead to inappropriate diagnosis and treatment with antibiotic therapy. Preanalytical interventions such as education, order restriction, and electronic order assistance are common but are limited in effectiveness. As an alternative approach, our antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) implemented prospective audit and feedback (PAF) on C. difficile PCR orders to reduce inappropriate testing. Methods: The study was conducted at a 399-bed, tertiary-care, Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center and included adult inpatients and outpatients for whom C. difficile PCR testing was ordered. In the preintervention period from June through September 2019, the ASP was alerted to C. difficile PCR tests and collected data but did not intervene. From October 2019 to January 2020, the ASP performed real-time PAF at the time of ordering. Appropriateness of testing was determined based on whether there was a negative result in the prior 7 days and a 3-step review of clinical factors (Fig. 1). When possible, a direct conversation took place with the ordering provider. If not possible, a general note delineating appropriate clinical criteria for testing was generated. No PAF was done outside standard hours. The ASP recommended cancelling tests deemed inappropriate. Monthly test rates during the pre- and postintervention periods were compared using the Student t test with α = .05, and test appropriateness was compared using the χ(2) test. All analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel software. Results: During the preintervention period, a total of 418 tests were ordered (104.5 per month). This number decreased to 276 (69 per month) during the intervention period. (p Conclusions: Direct PAF at the time of C. difficile PCR ordering may increase test appropriateness and is associated with a reduction in overall testing, primarily by reducing the number of tests that are considered not appropriate on clinical grounds. PAF is effective but requires significant time investment by ASP staff and may not be a sustainable intervention over time. Funding: None Disclosures: None Cambridge University Press 2022-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9614800/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.109 Text en © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | C. difficile Tassone, Daniel Hitchcock, Matthew Markley, John Stevens, Michael Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing |
title | Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing |
title_full | Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing |
title_fullStr | Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing |
title_short | Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing |
title_sort | prospective audit and feedback of clostridioides difficile pcr at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing |
topic | C. difficile |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614800/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.109 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tassonedaniel prospectiveauditandfeedbackofclostridioidesdifficilepcratthetimeoforderingincreasesappropriatenessoftesting AT hitchcockmatthew prospectiveauditandfeedbackofclostridioidesdifficilepcratthetimeoforderingincreasesappropriatenessoftesting AT markleyjohn prospectiveauditandfeedbackofclostridioidesdifficilepcratthetimeoforderingincreasesappropriatenessoftesting AT stevensmichael prospectiveauditandfeedbackofclostridioidesdifficilepcratthetimeoforderingincreasesappropriatenessoftesting |