Cargando…

Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing

Background: Over-testing for Clostridioides difficile infection outside acute diarrheal illness without a clear alternative cause can lead to inappropriate diagnosis and treatment with antibiotic therapy. Preanalytical interventions such as education, order restriction, and electronic order assistan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tassone, Daniel, Hitchcock, Matthew, Markley, John, Stevens, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614800/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.109
_version_ 1784820273068900352
author Tassone, Daniel
Hitchcock, Matthew
Markley, John
Stevens, Michael
author_facet Tassone, Daniel
Hitchcock, Matthew
Markley, John
Stevens, Michael
author_sort Tassone, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Background: Over-testing for Clostridioides difficile infection outside acute diarrheal illness without a clear alternative cause can lead to inappropriate diagnosis and treatment with antibiotic therapy. Preanalytical interventions such as education, order restriction, and electronic order assistance are common but are limited in effectiveness. As an alternative approach, our antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) implemented prospective audit and feedback (PAF) on C. difficile PCR orders to reduce inappropriate testing. Methods: The study was conducted at a 399-bed, tertiary-care, Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center and included adult inpatients and outpatients for whom C. difficile PCR testing was ordered. In the preintervention period from June through September 2019, the ASP was alerted to C. difficile PCR tests and collected data but did not intervene. From October 2019 to January 2020, the ASP performed real-time PAF at the time of ordering. Appropriateness of testing was determined based on whether there was a negative result in the prior 7 days and a 3-step review of clinical factors (Fig. 1). When possible, a direct conversation took place with the ordering provider. If not possible, a general note delineating appropriate clinical criteria for testing was generated. No PAF was done outside standard hours. The ASP recommended cancelling tests deemed inappropriate. Monthly test rates during the pre- and postintervention periods were compared using the Student t test with α = .05, and test appropriateness was compared using the χ(2) test. All analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel software. Results: During the preintervention period, a total of 418 tests were ordered (104.5 per month). This number decreased to 276 (69 per month) during the intervention period. (p Conclusions: Direct PAF at the time of C. difficile PCR ordering may increase test appropriateness and is associated with a reduction in overall testing, primarily by reducing the number of tests that are considered not appropriate on clinical grounds. PAF is effective but requires significant time investment by ASP staff and may not be a sustainable intervention over time. Funding: None Disclosures: None
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9614800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96148002022-10-29 Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing Tassone, Daniel Hitchcock, Matthew Markley, John Stevens, Michael Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol C. difficile Background: Over-testing for Clostridioides difficile infection outside acute diarrheal illness without a clear alternative cause can lead to inappropriate diagnosis and treatment with antibiotic therapy. Preanalytical interventions such as education, order restriction, and electronic order assistance are common but are limited in effectiveness. As an alternative approach, our antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) implemented prospective audit and feedback (PAF) on C. difficile PCR orders to reduce inappropriate testing. Methods: The study was conducted at a 399-bed, tertiary-care, Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center and included adult inpatients and outpatients for whom C. difficile PCR testing was ordered. In the preintervention period from June through September 2019, the ASP was alerted to C. difficile PCR tests and collected data but did not intervene. From October 2019 to January 2020, the ASP performed real-time PAF at the time of ordering. Appropriateness of testing was determined based on whether there was a negative result in the prior 7 days and a 3-step review of clinical factors (Fig. 1). When possible, a direct conversation took place with the ordering provider. If not possible, a general note delineating appropriate clinical criteria for testing was generated. No PAF was done outside standard hours. The ASP recommended cancelling tests deemed inappropriate. Monthly test rates during the pre- and postintervention periods were compared using the Student t test with α = .05, and test appropriateness was compared using the χ(2) test. All analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel software. Results: During the preintervention period, a total of 418 tests were ordered (104.5 per month). This number decreased to 276 (69 per month) during the intervention period. (p Conclusions: Direct PAF at the time of C. difficile PCR ordering may increase test appropriateness and is associated with a reduction in overall testing, primarily by reducing the number of tests that are considered not appropriate on clinical grounds. PAF is effective but requires significant time investment by ASP staff and may not be a sustainable intervention over time. Funding: None Disclosures: None Cambridge University Press 2022-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9614800/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.109 Text en © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle C. difficile
Tassone, Daniel
Hitchcock, Matthew
Markley, John
Stevens, Michael
Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing
title Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing
title_full Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing
title_fullStr Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing
title_full_unstemmed Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing
title_short Prospective audit and feedback of Clostridioides difficile PCR at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing
title_sort prospective audit and feedback of clostridioides difficile pcr at the time of ordering increases appropriateness of testing
topic C. difficile
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614800/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.109
work_keys_str_mv AT tassonedaniel prospectiveauditandfeedbackofclostridioidesdifficilepcratthetimeoforderingincreasesappropriatenessoftesting
AT hitchcockmatthew prospectiveauditandfeedbackofclostridioidesdifficilepcratthetimeoforderingincreasesappropriatenessoftesting
AT markleyjohn prospectiveauditandfeedbackofclostridioidesdifficilepcratthetimeoforderingincreasesappropriatenessoftesting
AT stevensmichael prospectiveauditandfeedbackofclostridioidesdifficilepcratthetimeoforderingincreasesappropriatenessoftesting