Cargando…

Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory?

Hospital-onset sepsis accounts for 10%–15% of all sepsis cases and is associated with very high mortality rates, yet to date most hospitals have paid little attention to tracking its incidence and outcomes. This contrasts sharply with the substantial effort that hospitals and regulatory agencies spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhee, Chanu, Klompas, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36310798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.16
_version_ 1784820280385863680
author Rhee, Chanu
Klompas, Michael
author_facet Rhee, Chanu
Klompas, Michael
author_sort Rhee, Chanu
collection PubMed
description Hospital-onset sepsis accounts for 10%–15% of all sepsis cases and is associated with very high mortality rates, yet to date most hospitals have paid little attention to tracking its incidence and outcomes. This contrasts sharply with the substantial effort that hospitals and regulatory agencies spend tracking and reporting a limited subset of healthcare-associated infections. The recent development of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event (ASE) definition, however, provides a validated and standardized mechanism for facilities to identify patients with nosocomial sepsis using routinely available electronic health record data. Recent data have demonstrated that hospital-onset ASE surveillance identifies many infections that are largely missed by current reportable healthcare-associated infections and that are associated with much higher mortality rates. Expanding the breadth of surveillance to include these highly consequential infections could help identify new targets for prevention and quality improvement and ultimately catalyze better outcomes for hospitalized patients. More work is needed, however, to characterize the preventability of hospital-onset ASE, develop and validate robust case-mix adjustment tools, and facilitate widespread uptake in hospitals with limited resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9614833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96148332022-10-29 Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory? Rhee, Chanu Klompas, Michael Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Commentary Hospital-onset sepsis accounts for 10%–15% of all sepsis cases and is associated with very high mortality rates, yet to date most hospitals have paid little attention to tracking its incidence and outcomes. This contrasts sharply with the substantial effort that hospitals and regulatory agencies spend tracking and reporting a limited subset of healthcare-associated infections. The recent development of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event (ASE) definition, however, provides a validated and standardized mechanism for facilities to identify patients with nosocomial sepsis using routinely available electronic health record data. Recent data have demonstrated that hospital-onset ASE surveillance identifies many infections that are largely missed by current reportable healthcare-associated infections and that are associated with much higher mortality rates. Expanding the breadth of surveillance to include these highly consequential infections could help identify new targets for prevention and quality improvement and ultimately catalyze better outcomes for hospitalized patients. More work is needed, however, to characterize the preventability of hospital-onset ASE, develop and validate robust case-mix adjustment tools, and facilitate widespread uptake in hospitals with limited resources. Cambridge University Press 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9614833/ /pubmed/36310798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.16 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Rhee, Chanu
Klompas, Michael
Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory?
title Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory?
title_full Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory?
title_fullStr Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory?
title_full_unstemmed Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory?
title_short Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory?
title_sort should hospital-onset adult sepsis event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36310798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.16
work_keys_str_mv AT rheechanu shouldhospitalonsetadultsepsiseventsurveillanceberoutineorevenmandatory
AT klompasmichael shouldhospitalonsetadultsepsiseventsurveillanceberoutineorevenmandatory