Cargando…
Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory?
Hospital-onset sepsis accounts for 10%–15% of all sepsis cases and is associated with very high mortality rates, yet to date most hospitals have paid little attention to tracking its incidence and outcomes. This contrasts sharply with the substantial effort that hospitals and regulatory agencies spe...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36310798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.16 |
_version_ | 1784820280385863680 |
---|---|
author | Rhee, Chanu Klompas, Michael |
author_facet | Rhee, Chanu Klompas, Michael |
author_sort | Rhee, Chanu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hospital-onset sepsis accounts for 10%–15% of all sepsis cases and is associated with very high mortality rates, yet to date most hospitals have paid little attention to tracking its incidence and outcomes. This contrasts sharply with the substantial effort that hospitals and regulatory agencies spend tracking and reporting a limited subset of healthcare-associated infections. The recent development of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event (ASE) definition, however, provides a validated and standardized mechanism for facilities to identify patients with nosocomial sepsis using routinely available electronic health record data. Recent data have demonstrated that hospital-onset ASE surveillance identifies many infections that are largely missed by current reportable healthcare-associated infections and that are associated with much higher mortality rates. Expanding the breadth of surveillance to include these highly consequential infections could help identify new targets for prevention and quality improvement and ultimately catalyze better outcomes for hospitalized patients. More work is needed, however, to characterize the preventability of hospital-onset ASE, develop and validate robust case-mix adjustment tools, and facilitate widespread uptake in hospitals with limited resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9614833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96148332022-10-29 Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory? Rhee, Chanu Klompas, Michael Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Commentary Hospital-onset sepsis accounts for 10%–15% of all sepsis cases and is associated with very high mortality rates, yet to date most hospitals have paid little attention to tracking its incidence and outcomes. This contrasts sharply with the substantial effort that hospitals and regulatory agencies spend tracking and reporting a limited subset of healthcare-associated infections. The recent development of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event (ASE) definition, however, provides a validated and standardized mechanism for facilities to identify patients with nosocomial sepsis using routinely available electronic health record data. Recent data have demonstrated that hospital-onset ASE surveillance identifies many infections that are largely missed by current reportable healthcare-associated infections and that are associated with much higher mortality rates. Expanding the breadth of surveillance to include these highly consequential infections could help identify new targets for prevention and quality improvement and ultimately catalyze better outcomes for hospitalized patients. More work is needed, however, to characterize the preventability of hospital-onset ASE, develop and validate robust case-mix adjustment tools, and facilitate widespread uptake in hospitals with limited resources. Cambridge University Press 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9614833/ /pubmed/36310798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.16 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Rhee, Chanu Klompas, Michael Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory? |
title | Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory? |
title_full | Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory? |
title_fullStr | Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory? |
title_short | Should hospital-onset Adult Sepsis Event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory? |
title_sort | should hospital-onset adult sepsis event surveillance be routine… or even mandatory? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36310798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rheechanu shouldhospitalonsetadultsepsiseventsurveillanceberoutineorevenmandatory AT klompasmichael shouldhospitalonsetadultsepsiseventsurveillanceberoutineorevenmandatory |