Cargando…

A comparison of different exercise intensities for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effects of moderate- and high-intensity resistance and impact training (MiRIT and HiRIT, respectively) on changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials that compared the intervention e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitagawa, Takashi, Hiraya, Kaede, Denda, Takumi, Yamamoto, Shuhei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36310762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2022.101631
_version_ 1784820351622971392
author Kitagawa, Takashi
Hiraya, Kaede
Denda, Takumi
Yamamoto, Shuhei
author_facet Kitagawa, Takashi
Hiraya, Kaede
Denda, Takumi
Yamamoto, Shuhei
author_sort Kitagawa, Takashi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effects of moderate- and high-intensity resistance and impact training (MiRIT and HiRIT, respectively) on changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials that compared the intervention effects of MiRIT and HiRIT were used as selection criteria to assess study patients with osteoporosis or an osteoporotic condition. Database searches were conducted on August 25, 2022, using CENTRAL, PubMed, CINAHL Web of Science, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. A risk of bias assessment was performed using Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for the assessment of randomized controlled trials. Point estimates and 95 % confidence intervals of change in BMD derived using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were collected as outcomes, and a meta-analysis was performed using the amount of change in BMD before and after the intervention. Adverse event data were also collected. RESULTS: The search yielded six studies (391 patients, mean age 53–65 years) that met the inclusion criteria. The intervention duration ranged from 24 weeks to 13 months. Compared with the MiRIT group, the HiRIT group showed significantly improved BMD of the lumbar spine (standardized mean difference 2.37 [0.10–4.65]). However, a high degree of heterogeneity was observed for three studies (154 patients, I(2) = 98 %). Almost all studies reported minimal adverse events. The certainty of evidence was extremely low because of the risk of bias, inconsistency among studies, and imprecision in terms of sample size. CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis may achieve more significantly improved lumbar spine BMD with HiRIT than with MiRIT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9615132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96151322022-10-29 A comparison of different exercise intensities for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Kitagawa, Takashi Hiraya, Kaede Denda, Takumi Yamamoto, Shuhei Bone Rep Review OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effects of moderate- and high-intensity resistance and impact training (MiRIT and HiRIT, respectively) on changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials that compared the intervention effects of MiRIT and HiRIT were used as selection criteria to assess study patients with osteoporosis or an osteoporotic condition. Database searches were conducted on August 25, 2022, using CENTRAL, PubMed, CINAHL Web of Science, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. A risk of bias assessment was performed using Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for the assessment of randomized controlled trials. Point estimates and 95 % confidence intervals of change in BMD derived using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were collected as outcomes, and a meta-analysis was performed using the amount of change in BMD before and after the intervention. Adverse event data were also collected. RESULTS: The search yielded six studies (391 patients, mean age 53–65 years) that met the inclusion criteria. The intervention duration ranged from 24 weeks to 13 months. Compared with the MiRIT group, the HiRIT group showed significantly improved BMD of the lumbar spine (standardized mean difference 2.37 [0.10–4.65]). However, a high degree of heterogeneity was observed for three studies (154 patients, I(2) = 98 %). Almost all studies reported minimal adverse events. The certainty of evidence was extremely low because of the risk of bias, inconsistency among studies, and imprecision in terms of sample size. CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis may achieve more significantly improved lumbar spine BMD with HiRIT than with MiRIT. Elsevier 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9615132/ /pubmed/36310762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2022.101631 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kitagawa, Takashi
Hiraya, Kaede
Denda, Takumi
Yamamoto, Shuhei
A comparison of different exercise intensities for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title A comparison of different exercise intensities for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full A comparison of different exercise intensities for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr A comparison of different exercise intensities for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of different exercise intensities for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short A comparison of different exercise intensities for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of different exercise intensities for improving bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36310762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2022.101631
work_keys_str_mv AT kitagawatakashi acomparisonofdifferentexerciseintensitiesforimprovingbonemineraldensityinpostmenopausalwomenwithosteoporosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hirayakaede acomparisonofdifferentexerciseintensitiesforimprovingbonemineraldensityinpostmenopausalwomenwithosteoporosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dendatakumi acomparisonofdifferentexerciseintensitiesforimprovingbonemineraldensityinpostmenopausalwomenwithosteoporosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yamamotoshuhei acomparisonofdifferentexerciseintensitiesforimprovingbonemineraldensityinpostmenopausalwomenwithosteoporosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kitagawatakashi comparisonofdifferentexerciseintensitiesforimprovingbonemineraldensityinpostmenopausalwomenwithosteoporosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hirayakaede comparisonofdifferentexerciseintensitiesforimprovingbonemineraldensityinpostmenopausalwomenwithosteoporosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dendatakumi comparisonofdifferentexerciseintensitiesforimprovingbonemineraldensityinpostmenopausalwomenwithosteoporosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yamamotoshuhei comparisonofdifferentexerciseintensitiesforimprovingbonemineraldensityinpostmenopausalwomenwithosteoporosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis