Cargando…

Social prescribing for frequent attenders in primary care: An economic analysis

BACKGROUND: Social prescribing (SP) is a mechanism to link patients with community groups and third sector organizations. It offers a complimentary approach to the traditional medical models to address psychosocial needs of patients more effectively and in turn aims to reduce demand on the NHS. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lynch, Mary, Jones, Ceri R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36311628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.902199
_version_ 1784820417491369984
author Lynch, Mary
Jones, Ceri R.
author_facet Lynch, Mary
Jones, Ceri R.
author_sort Lynch, Mary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Social prescribing (SP) is a mechanism to link patients with community groups and third sector organizations. It offers a complimentary approach to the traditional medical models to address psychosocial needs of patients more effectively and in turn aims to reduce demand on the NHS. The aim of this study was to explore the economic benefits related to changes in the use of healthcare resources following a social prescribing intervention in four primary care practices in Wales. METHODS: Quantitative data from routine healthcare usage was collected from the 78 participants pre and post-intervention. The participants were grouped into frequent attenders (FA) (n = 21) and frequent (n = 57) non-attenders (FNA), and a cost analysis was conducted to estimate cost variances based on healthcare unit usage over the length of the pilot intervention. These were then extrapolated forward to identify potential healthcare savings. RESULTS: The SP as an intervention generated the largest cost saving for FAs. The cost variance when FAs participated in the intervention shows there is a direct cost saving of £6,113 or £78.37 per participant over the 5 months of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest there may be a cost saving associated with SP interventions, however caution should be exercised in interpreting the results due to the lack of control group in this study The cost saving were largest for FAs, where the intervention reduced healthcare unit usage as well as actual and inferred impact on associated healthcare costs. This suggests that in practice to generate the maximum cost benefit SP interventions could be targeted at FAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9615419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96154192022-10-29 Social prescribing for frequent attenders in primary care: An economic analysis Lynch, Mary Jones, Ceri R. Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: Social prescribing (SP) is a mechanism to link patients with community groups and third sector organizations. It offers a complimentary approach to the traditional medical models to address psychosocial needs of patients more effectively and in turn aims to reduce demand on the NHS. The aim of this study was to explore the economic benefits related to changes in the use of healthcare resources following a social prescribing intervention in four primary care practices in Wales. METHODS: Quantitative data from routine healthcare usage was collected from the 78 participants pre and post-intervention. The participants were grouped into frequent attenders (FA) (n = 21) and frequent (n = 57) non-attenders (FNA), and a cost analysis was conducted to estimate cost variances based on healthcare unit usage over the length of the pilot intervention. These were then extrapolated forward to identify potential healthcare savings. RESULTS: The SP as an intervention generated the largest cost saving for FAs. The cost variance when FAs participated in the intervention shows there is a direct cost saving of £6,113 or £78.37 per participant over the 5 months of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest there may be a cost saving associated with SP interventions, however caution should be exercised in interpreting the results due to the lack of control group in this study The cost saving were largest for FAs, where the intervention reduced healthcare unit usage as well as actual and inferred impact on associated healthcare costs. This suggests that in practice to generate the maximum cost benefit SP interventions could be targeted at FAs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9615419/ /pubmed/36311628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.902199 Text en Copyright © 2022 Lynch and Jones. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Lynch, Mary
Jones, Ceri R.
Social prescribing for frequent attenders in primary care: An economic analysis
title Social prescribing for frequent attenders in primary care: An economic analysis
title_full Social prescribing for frequent attenders in primary care: An economic analysis
title_fullStr Social prescribing for frequent attenders in primary care: An economic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Social prescribing for frequent attenders in primary care: An economic analysis
title_short Social prescribing for frequent attenders in primary care: An economic analysis
title_sort social prescribing for frequent attenders in primary care: an economic analysis
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36311628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.902199
work_keys_str_mv AT lynchmary socialprescribingforfrequentattendersinprimarycareaneconomicanalysis
AT jonescerir socialprescribingforfrequentattendersinprimarycareaneconomicanalysis