Cargando…
Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment?
INTRODUCTION: Current Brazilian legislation requires that all workers exposed to noise are to be given an audiogram upon hiring, after 6 months of employment (first periodic test), and annually after the first periodic test. In other countries, the regulations of hearing conservation programs do not...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.12.008 |
_version_ | 1784820439858544640 |
---|---|
author | Silva, Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta Duarte, Alexandre Scalli Mathias Lavinsky, Joel Castilho, Arthur Menino Chone, Carlos Takahiro Crespo, Agricio Nubiato |
author_facet | Silva, Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta Duarte, Alexandre Scalli Mathias Lavinsky, Joel Castilho, Arthur Menino Chone, Carlos Takahiro Crespo, Agricio Nubiato |
author_sort | Silva, Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Current Brazilian legislation requires that all workers exposed to noise are to be given an audiogram upon hiring, after 6 months of employment (first periodic test), and annually after the first periodic test. In other countries, the regulations of hearing conservation programs do not include the requirement for audiometric testing at 6 months of employment, but only annually. There is no evidence that the periodicity adopted by Brazilian legislation is the most appropriate. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the first 3 occupational audiometric tests of workers exposed to noise. METHODS: Historical cohort study with cross-sectional analysis. Participants were all male metallurgy workers aged up to 40 years. The first 3 audiograms of each worker were analyzed: pre-employment audiometric test, periodic audiometric test 1, and periodic audiometric test 2. For each worker, mean frequency thresholds were calculated at 3, 4, and 6 kHz in the left and right ears for each test. Statistical analysis was performed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: A total of 988 workers were included. There was a significant difference in auditory thresholds between the pre-employment test and the 2 subsequent periodic tests for the right and left ears. There was no significant difference between Test1 and Test2 in either ear. CONCLUSION: Given the lack of difference between the first 2 periodic tests, we believe that they could be merged into a single test, i.e., first periodic audiometric testing could be performed at 12 months of employment without compromising workers’ health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9615527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96155272022-10-29 Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment? Silva, Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta Duarte, Alexandre Scalli Mathias Lavinsky, Joel Castilho, Arthur Menino Chone, Carlos Takahiro Crespo, Agricio Nubiato Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Current Brazilian legislation requires that all workers exposed to noise are to be given an audiogram upon hiring, after 6 months of employment (first periodic test), and annually after the first periodic test. In other countries, the regulations of hearing conservation programs do not include the requirement for audiometric testing at 6 months of employment, but only annually. There is no evidence that the periodicity adopted by Brazilian legislation is the most appropriate. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the first 3 occupational audiometric tests of workers exposed to noise. METHODS: Historical cohort study with cross-sectional analysis. Participants were all male metallurgy workers aged up to 40 years. The first 3 audiograms of each worker were analyzed: pre-employment audiometric test, periodic audiometric test 1, and periodic audiometric test 2. For each worker, mean frequency thresholds were calculated at 3, 4, and 6 kHz in the left and right ears for each test. Statistical analysis was performed using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: A total of 988 workers were included. There was a significant difference in auditory thresholds between the pre-employment test and the 2 subsequent periodic tests for the right and left ears. There was no significant difference between Test1 and Test2 in either ear. CONCLUSION: Given the lack of difference between the first 2 periodic tests, we believe that they could be merged into a single test, i.e., first periodic audiometric testing could be performed at 12 months of employment without compromising workers’ health. Elsevier 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9615527/ /pubmed/33663974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.12.008 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. on behalf of Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Silva, Vagner Antonio Rodrigues da Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta Duarte, Alexandre Scalli Mathias Lavinsky, Joel Castilho, Arthur Menino Chone, Carlos Takahiro Crespo, Agricio Nubiato Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment? |
title | Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment? |
title_full | Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment? |
title_fullStr | Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment? |
title_short | Is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment? |
title_sort | is it necessary to perform occupational audiometric testing at 6-months of employment? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.12.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvavagnerantoniorodriguesda isitnecessarytoperformoccupationalaudiometrictestingat6monthsofemployment AT guimaraesalexandrecaixeta isitnecessarytoperformoccupationalaudiometrictestingat6monthsofemployment AT duartealexandrescallimathias isitnecessarytoperformoccupationalaudiometrictestingat6monthsofemployment AT lavinskyjoel isitnecessarytoperformoccupationalaudiometrictestingat6monthsofemployment AT castilhoarthurmenino isitnecessarytoperformoccupationalaudiometrictestingat6monthsofemployment AT chonecarlostakahiro isitnecessarytoperformoccupationalaudiometrictestingat6monthsofemployment AT crespoagricionubiato isitnecessarytoperformoccupationalaudiometrictestingat6monthsofemployment |