Cargando…
RCVS: by clinicians for clinicians—a narrative review
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome may be underdiagnosed. It can be accompanied by various complications, mainly intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke. The clinical presentation of this condition varies according to its localization. The aims of this review ar...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36305970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11425-z |
_version_ | 1784820464295608320 |
---|---|
author | Erhart, Deborah Katharina Ludolph, Albert Christian Althaus, Katharina |
author_facet | Erhart, Deborah Katharina Ludolph, Albert Christian Althaus, Katharina |
author_sort | Erhart, Deborah Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome may be underdiagnosed. It can be accompanied by various complications, mainly intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke. The clinical presentation of this condition varies according to its localization. The aims of this review are to raise awareness of the disease, especially in the presence of corresponding risk factors; to connect its precipitating factors, pathophysiology, and complications; and to compare various differential diagnoses of vasoconstriction. METHODS: A review of the literature in PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar was conducted from May 1997 until May 2022. RESULTS: Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, which is a clinical–radiological syndrome, is mainly characterized by the occurrence of thunderclap headache and widespread vasoconstriction. The most common precipitating factors are the use of vasoactive substances and postpartum status. The pathophysiology is currently assumed to include two mechanisms: sympathetic overactivity and endothelial dysfunction. From these mechanisms, it is possible to derive potential complications as well as the most important differential diagnoses: posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, and primary angiitis of the central nervous system. CONCLUSION: In general, the outcome of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is very good. Vasospasm as well as thunderclap headache attacks can be fully reversible, and > 90% of patients are functionally independent at discharge. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11425-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9615630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96156302022-10-28 RCVS: by clinicians for clinicians—a narrative review Erhart, Deborah Katharina Ludolph, Albert Christian Althaus, Katharina J Neurol Review BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome may be underdiagnosed. It can be accompanied by various complications, mainly intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke. The clinical presentation of this condition varies according to its localization. The aims of this review are to raise awareness of the disease, especially in the presence of corresponding risk factors; to connect its precipitating factors, pathophysiology, and complications; and to compare various differential diagnoses of vasoconstriction. METHODS: A review of the literature in PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar was conducted from May 1997 until May 2022. RESULTS: Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, which is a clinical–radiological syndrome, is mainly characterized by the occurrence of thunderclap headache and widespread vasoconstriction. The most common precipitating factors are the use of vasoactive substances and postpartum status. The pathophysiology is currently assumed to include two mechanisms: sympathetic overactivity and endothelial dysfunction. From these mechanisms, it is possible to derive potential complications as well as the most important differential diagnoses: posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, and primary angiitis of the central nervous system. CONCLUSION: In general, the outcome of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome is very good. Vasospasm as well as thunderclap headache attacks can be fully reversible, and > 90% of patients are functionally independent at discharge. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11425-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9615630/ /pubmed/36305970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11425-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Erhart, Deborah Katharina Ludolph, Albert Christian Althaus, Katharina RCVS: by clinicians for clinicians—a narrative review |
title | RCVS: by clinicians for clinicians—a narrative review |
title_full | RCVS: by clinicians for clinicians—a narrative review |
title_fullStr | RCVS: by clinicians for clinicians—a narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | RCVS: by clinicians for clinicians—a narrative review |
title_short | RCVS: by clinicians for clinicians—a narrative review |
title_sort | rcvs: by clinicians for clinicians—a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36305970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11425-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erhartdeborahkatharina rcvsbycliniciansforcliniciansanarrativereview AT ludolphalbertchristian rcvsbycliniciansforcliniciansanarrativereview AT althauskatharina rcvsbycliniciansforcliniciansanarrativereview |