Cargando…

A discussion of RNA virus taxonomy based on the 2020 International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses report

RNA viruses have a higher mutation rate than DNA viruses; however, RNA viruses are insufficiently studied outside disease settings. The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) is an organization set up by virologists to standardize virus classification. To better understand ICTV taxono...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Wen-Guang, Liu, Guang-Feng, Shi, Ying-Hui, Xie, Ke-Ming, Jiang, Jing-Zhe, Yuan, Li-Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312925
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.960465
_version_ 1784820530986090496
author Yuan, Wen-Guang
Liu, Guang-Feng
Shi, Ying-Hui
Xie, Ke-Ming
Jiang, Jing-Zhe
Yuan, Li-Hong
author_facet Yuan, Wen-Guang
Liu, Guang-Feng
Shi, Ying-Hui
Xie, Ke-Ming
Jiang, Jing-Zhe
Yuan, Li-Hong
author_sort Yuan, Wen-Guang
collection PubMed
description RNA viruses have a higher mutation rate than DNA viruses; however, RNA viruses are insufficiently studied outside disease settings. The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) is an organization set up by virologists to standardize virus classification. To better understand ICTV taxonomy and the characteristics and rules of different RNA virus families, we analyzed the 3,529 RNA viruses included in the 2020 ICTV report using five widely used metrics: length, host, GC content, number of predicted ORFs, and sequence similarity. The results show that host type has a significant influence on viral genome length and GC content. The genome lengths of virus members within the same genus are quite similar: 98.28% of the genome length differences within any particular genus are less than 20%. The species within those genera containing segmented viruses also have a similar length and number of segments. The number of predicted ORFs in the RNA viral genomes also shows a strong, statistically significant correlation with genome length. We suggest that due to the high mutation rate of RNA virus genomes, current RNA virus classification should mainly rely on protein similarities rather than nucleic acid similarities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9615923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96159232022-10-29 A discussion of RNA virus taxonomy based on the 2020 International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses report Yuan, Wen-Guang Liu, Guang-Feng Shi, Ying-Hui Xie, Ke-Ming Jiang, Jing-Zhe Yuan, Li-Hong Front Microbiol Microbiology RNA viruses have a higher mutation rate than DNA viruses; however, RNA viruses are insufficiently studied outside disease settings. The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) is an organization set up by virologists to standardize virus classification. To better understand ICTV taxonomy and the characteristics and rules of different RNA virus families, we analyzed the 3,529 RNA viruses included in the 2020 ICTV report using five widely used metrics: length, host, GC content, number of predicted ORFs, and sequence similarity. The results show that host type has a significant influence on viral genome length and GC content. The genome lengths of virus members within the same genus are quite similar: 98.28% of the genome length differences within any particular genus are less than 20%. The species within those genera containing segmented viruses also have a similar length and number of segments. The number of predicted ORFs in the RNA viral genomes also shows a strong, statistically significant correlation with genome length. We suggest that due to the high mutation rate of RNA virus genomes, current RNA virus classification should mainly rely on protein similarities rather than nucleic acid similarities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9615923/ /pubmed/36312925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.960465 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yuan, Liu, Shi, Xie, Jiang and Yuan. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Yuan, Wen-Guang
Liu, Guang-Feng
Shi, Ying-Hui
Xie, Ke-Ming
Jiang, Jing-Zhe
Yuan, Li-Hong
A discussion of RNA virus taxonomy based on the 2020 International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses report
title A discussion of RNA virus taxonomy based on the 2020 International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses report
title_full A discussion of RNA virus taxonomy based on the 2020 International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses report
title_fullStr A discussion of RNA virus taxonomy based on the 2020 International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses report
title_full_unstemmed A discussion of RNA virus taxonomy based on the 2020 International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses report
title_short A discussion of RNA virus taxonomy based on the 2020 International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses report
title_sort discussion of rna virus taxonomy based on the 2020 international committee on taxonomy of viruses report
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36312925
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.960465
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanwenguang adiscussionofrnavirustaxonomybasedonthe2020internationalcommitteeontaxonomyofvirusesreport
AT liuguangfeng adiscussionofrnavirustaxonomybasedonthe2020internationalcommitteeontaxonomyofvirusesreport
AT shiyinghui adiscussionofrnavirustaxonomybasedonthe2020internationalcommitteeontaxonomyofvirusesreport
AT xiekeming adiscussionofrnavirustaxonomybasedonthe2020internationalcommitteeontaxonomyofvirusesreport
AT jiangjingzhe adiscussionofrnavirustaxonomybasedonthe2020internationalcommitteeontaxonomyofvirusesreport
AT yuanlihong adiscussionofrnavirustaxonomybasedonthe2020internationalcommitteeontaxonomyofvirusesreport
AT yuanwenguang discussionofrnavirustaxonomybasedonthe2020internationalcommitteeontaxonomyofvirusesreport
AT liuguangfeng discussionofrnavirustaxonomybasedonthe2020internationalcommitteeontaxonomyofvirusesreport
AT shiyinghui discussionofrnavirustaxonomybasedonthe2020internationalcommitteeontaxonomyofvirusesreport
AT xiekeming discussionofrnavirustaxonomybasedonthe2020internationalcommitteeontaxonomyofvirusesreport
AT jiangjingzhe discussionofrnavirustaxonomybasedonthe2020internationalcommitteeontaxonomyofvirusesreport
AT yuanlihong discussionofrnavirustaxonomybasedonthe2020internationalcommitteeontaxonomyofvirusesreport