Cargando…

Phimosis – Are we on Right Track?

BACKGROUND: Phimosis, a common paediatric condition, is defined as the inability to retract the preputial skin behind the glans. Current practice shows there is some confusion among the paediatricians towards this common condition and in differentiating it from the more common physiological preputia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manekar, Aditya Arvind, Janjala, Narahari, Sahoo, Subrat Kumar, Tripathy, Bikasha Bihary, Mohanty, Manoj Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018197
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajps.ajps_143_21
_version_ 1784820537358286848
author Manekar, Aditya Arvind
Janjala, Narahari
Sahoo, Subrat Kumar
Tripathy, Bikasha Bihary
Mohanty, Manoj Kumar
author_facet Manekar, Aditya Arvind
Janjala, Narahari
Sahoo, Subrat Kumar
Tripathy, Bikasha Bihary
Mohanty, Manoj Kumar
author_sort Manekar, Aditya Arvind
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phimosis, a common paediatric condition, is defined as the inability to retract the preputial skin behind the glans. Current practice shows there is some confusion among the paediatricians towards this common condition and in differentiating it from the more common physiological preputial adhesion; leading to frequent referrals to a paediatric surgeon or a general surgeon, which can be addressed by the parents and the child physicians themselves. AIM: To find out the awareness towards the management of phimosis among the paediatricians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire on this topic was generated using ‘Google Forms’ and was circulated among junior and senior residents, faculty in various medical colleges and consultants in private practice all over India and their response was collected and analysed. RESULTS: We received a total of 221 responses from all over India from paediatric medicine trainees and consultants. Among them, majority (48%) were senior residents. According to the survey participants, the most (46%) find inability to retract the prepuce as the major presenting complaint. A straight away reference to a paediatric surgeon was preferred by majority of paediatricians (62.9%), though most of them were aware of them were aware of physiological adhesions and conservative management (94.2%). There was a belief among 43% about counselling each and every patient presenting with phimosis for circumcision. Among the respondents, 60.2% advised ultrasound of kidneys, ureter, and bladder to their patients and believed that backpressure changes alter the management of the child. A urine routine examination was advised by 70.1% of participants, with 46.6% believing that the presence of urinary tract infection changes the management of phimosis. Waiting up to 1 year of age before going for surgery was advocated by 71.5%. A major proportion of respondents (76%) believed all cases of phimosis should be referred to a surgeon, only 58.8% would voluntarily follow them up. There is still a belief among 69.7% of participants that all cases of phimosis should be referred to a paediatric surgeon and only few of them, 5.4% feel referring only indicated cases. CONCLUSION: Physiological phimosis is a common condition which can be addressed by the paediatricians themselves. Awareness is to be increased among them, especially during the training period regarding the proper management of this common condition, avoiding unnecessary circumcisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9615947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96159472022-10-29 Phimosis – Are we on Right Track? Manekar, Aditya Arvind Janjala, Narahari Sahoo, Subrat Kumar Tripathy, Bikasha Bihary Mohanty, Manoj Kumar Afr J Paediatr Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Phimosis, a common paediatric condition, is defined as the inability to retract the preputial skin behind the glans. Current practice shows there is some confusion among the paediatricians towards this common condition and in differentiating it from the more common physiological preputial adhesion; leading to frequent referrals to a paediatric surgeon or a general surgeon, which can be addressed by the parents and the child physicians themselves. AIM: To find out the awareness towards the management of phimosis among the paediatricians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire on this topic was generated using ‘Google Forms’ and was circulated among junior and senior residents, faculty in various medical colleges and consultants in private practice all over India and their response was collected and analysed. RESULTS: We received a total of 221 responses from all over India from paediatric medicine trainees and consultants. Among them, majority (48%) were senior residents. According to the survey participants, the most (46%) find inability to retract the prepuce as the major presenting complaint. A straight away reference to a paediatric surgeon was preferred by majority of paediatricians (62.9%), though most of them were aware of them were aware of physiological adhesions and conservative management (94.2%). There was a belief among 43% about counselling each and every patient presenting with phimosis for circumcision. Among the respondents, 60.2% advised ultrasound of kidneys, ureter, and bladder to their patients and believed that backpressure changes alter the management of the child. A urine routine examination was advised by 70.1% of participants, with 46.6% believing that the presence of urinary tract infection changes the management of phimosis. Waiting up to 1 year of age before going for surgery was advocated by 71.5%. A major proportion of respondents (76%) believed all cases of phimosis should be referred to a surgeon, only 58.8% would voluntarily follow them up. There is still a belief among 69.7% of participants that all cases of phimosis should be referred to a paediatric surgeon and only few of them, 5.4% feel referring only indicated cases. CONCLUSION: Physiological phimosis is a common condition which can be addressed by the paediatricians themselves. Awareness is to be increased among them, especially during the training period regarding the proper management of this common condition, avoiding unnecessary circumcisions. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9615947/ /pubmed/36018197 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajps.ajps_143_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 African Journal of Paediatric Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Manekar, Aditya Arvind
Janjala, Narahari
Sahoo, Subrat Kumar
Tripathy, Bikasha Bihary
Mohanty, Manoj Kumar
Phimosis – Are we on Right Track?
title Phimosis – Are we on Right Track?
title_full Phimosis – Are we on Right Track?
title_fullStr Phimosis – Are we on Right Track?
title_full_unstemmed Phimosis – Are we on Right Track?
title_short Phimosis – Are we on Right Track?
title_sort phimosis – are we on right track?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018197
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajps.ajps_143_21
work_keys_str_mv AT manekaradityaarvind phimosisareweonrighttrack
AT janjalanarahari phimosisareweonrighttrack
AT sahoosubratkumar phimosisareweonrighttrack
AT tripathybikashabihary phimosisareweonrighttrack
AT mohantymanojkumar phimosisareweonrighttrack