Cargando…
Vulnerability of populations to malaria after indoor residual spraying is withdrawn from areas where its use has previously been sustained: a protocol for a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: With its proven effectiveness, indoor residual spraying (IRS) as a malaria vector control strategy forms one of the reliable vector control strategies, especially when at least 80% of the population is covered. However, to date, there is uncertainty regarding the consequences of IRS wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36288839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065115 |
_version_ | 1784820550637453312 |
---|---|
author | Orishaba, Philip Kayongo, Edward Lusiba, Pastan Nakalema, Caroline Kasadha, Peter Kirya, Perez Kawooya, Ismael Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona |
author_facet | Orishaba, Philip Kayongo, Edward Lusiba, Pastan Nakalema, Caroline Kasadha, Peter Kirya, Perez Kawooya, Ismael Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona |
author_sort | Orishaba, Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: With its proven effectiveness, indoor residual spraying (IRS) as a malaria vector control strategy forms one of the reliable vector control strategies, especially when at least 80% of the population is covered. However, to date, there is uncertainty regarding the consequences of IRS withdrawal on malaria control when there is no clear exit strategy in place. Therefore, there is a need to comprehensively update literature regarding malaria burden indicators when IRS is withdrawn following sustained use. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic search of studies published between 2000 and 2022 will be performed in CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, ProQuest, PsychInfo, Scopus and OpenGrey. Preset eligibility criteria will be used to identify studies for inclusion by two independent reviewers. Title/abstracts will first be screened and potentially eligible ones screened using their full-text publications. Any conflicts/discrepancies at the two stages will be resolved through regular discussion sessions. Included studies will be extracted to capture study and patient characteristics and relevant outcomes (malaria incidence and malaria vector abundance). Relevant tools will be used to assess the risk of bias in the studies measuring the impact of withdrawal. A meta-analysis will be performed if sufficient homogeneity exists; otherwise, data arising will be presented using tables and by employing narrative synthesis techniques. Heterogeneity will be assessed using a combination of visual inspection of the forest plot along with consideration of the χ(2) test and I(2) statistic results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not applicable for this study since no original data will be collected. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Furthermore, this systematic review will inform the design of exit strategies for IRS-based programmes in malaria-endemic areas. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022310655. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9615991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96159912022-10-29 Vulnerability of populations to malaria after indoor residual spraying is withdrawn from areas where its use has previously been sustained: a protocol for a systematic review Orishaba, Philip Kayongo, Edward Lusiba, Pastan Nakalema, Caroline Kasadha, Peter Kirya, Perez Kawooya, Ismael Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona BMJ Open Infectious Diseases INTRODUCTION: With its proven effectiveness, indoor residual spraying (IRS) as a malaria vector control strategy forms one of the reliable vector control strategies, especially when at least 80% of the population is covered. However, to date, there is uncertainty regarding the consequences of IRS withdrawal on malaria control when there is no clear exit strategy in place. Therefore, there is a need to comprehensively update literature regarding malaria burden indicators when IRS is withdrawn following sustained use. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic search of studies published between 2000 and 2022 will be performed in CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, ProQuest, PsychInfo, Scopus and OpenGrey. Preset eligibility criteria will be used to identify studies for inclusion by two independent reviewers. Title/abstracts will first be screened and potentially eligible ones screened using their full-text publications. Any conflicts/discrepancies at the two stages will be resolved through regular discussion sessions. Included studies will be extracted to capture study and patient characteristics and relevant outcomes (malaria incidence and malaria vector abundance). Relevant tools will be used to assess the risk of bias in the studies measuring the impact of withdrawal. A meta-analysis will be performed if sufficient homogeneity exists; otherwise, data arising will be presented using tables and by employing narrative synthesis techniques. Heterogeneity will be assessed using a combination of visual inspection of the forest plot along with consideration of the χ(2) test and I(2) statistic results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not applicable for this study since no original data will be collected. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Furthermore, this systematic review will inform the design of exit strategies for IRS-based programmes in malaria-endemic areas. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022310655. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9615991/ /pubmed/36288839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065115 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Orishaba, Philip Kayongo, Edward Lusiba, Pastan Nakalema, Caroline Kasadha, Peter Kirya, Perez Kawooya, Ismael Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona Vulnerability of populations to malaria after indoor residual spraying is withdrawn from areas where its use has previously been sustained: a protocol for a systematic review |
title | Vulnerability of populations to malaria after indoor residual spraying is withdrawn from areas where its use has previously been sustained: a protocol for a systematic review |
title_full | Vulnerability of populations to malaria after indoor residual spraying is withdrawn from areas where its use has previously been sustained: a protocol for a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Vulnerability of populations to malaria after indoor residual spraying is withdrawn from areas where its use has previously been sustained: a protocol for a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Vulnerability of populations to malaria after indoor residual spraying is withdrawn from areas where its use has previously been sustained: a protocol for a systematic review |
title_short | Vulnerability of populations to malaria after indoor residual spraying is withdrawn from areas where its use has previously been sustained: a protocol for a systematic review |
title_sort | vulnerability of populations to malaria after indoor residual spraying is withdrawn from areas where its use has previously been sustained: a protocol for a systematic review |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9615991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36288839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orishabaphilip vulnerabilityofpopulationstomalariaafterindoorresidualsprayingiswithdrawnfromareaswhereitsusehaspreviouslybeensustainedaprotocolforasystematicreview AT kayongoedward vulnerabilityofpopulationstomalariaafterindoorresidualsprayingiswithdrawnfromareaswhereitsusehaspreviouslybeensustainedaprotocolforasystematicreview AT lusibapastan vulnerabilityofpopulationstomalariaafterindoorresidualsprayingiswithdrawnfromareaswhereitsusehaspreviouslybeensustainedaprotocolforasystematicreview AT nakalemacaroline vulnerabilityofpopulationstomalariaafterindoorresidualsprayingiswithdrawnfromareaswhereitsusehaspreviouslybeensustainedaprotocolforasystematicreview AT kasadhapeter vulnerabilityofpopulationstomalariaafterindoorresidualsprayingiswithdrawnfromareaswhereitsusehaspreviouslybeensustainedaprotocolforasystematicreview AT kiryaperez vulnerabilityofpopulationstomalariaafterindoorresidualsprayingiswithdrawnfromareaswhereitsusehaspreviouslybeensustainedaprotocolforasystematicreview AT kawooyaismael vulnerabilityofpopulationstomalariaafterindoorresidualsprayingiswithdrawnfromareaswhereitsusehaspreviouslybeensustainedaprotocolforasystematicreview AT mijumbideverhona vulnerabilityofpopulationstomalariaafterindoorresidualsprayingiswithdrawnfromareaswhereitsusehaspreviouslybeensustainedaprotocolforasystematicreview |