Cargando…

Two-step artificial intelligence system for endoscopic gastric biopsy improves the diagnostic accuracy of pathologists

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biopsy is the pivotal procedure for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. In this study, we applied whole-slide images (WSIs) of endoscopic gastric biopsy specimens to develop an endoscopic gastric biopsy assistant system (EGBAS). METHODS: The EGBAS was trained using 2373 WSIs expe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Yan, Yuan, Wei, Xie, Chun-Mei, Xu, Wei, Wang, Jia-Ping, Feng, Li, Wu, Hui-Li, Lu, Pin-Xiang, Geng, Zi-Han, Lv, Chuan-Feng, Li, Quan-Lin, Hou, Ying-Yong, Chen, Wei-Feng, Zhou, Ping-Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36313701
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1008537
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biopsy is the pivotal procedure for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. In this study, we applied whole-slide images (WSIs) of endoscopic gastric biopsy specimens to develop an endoscopic gastric biopsy assistant system (EGBAS). METHODS: The EGBAS was trained using 2373 WSIs expertly annotated and internally validated on 245 WSIs. A large-scale, multicenter test dataset of 2003 WSIs was used to externally evaluate EGBAS. Eight pathologists were compared with the EGBAS using a man-machine comparison test dataset. The fully manual performance of the pathologists was also compared with semi-manual performance using EGBAS assistance. RESULTS: The average area under the curve of the EGBAS was 0·979 (0·958-0·990). For the diagnosis of all four categories, the overall accuracy of EGBAS was 86·95%, which was significantly higher than pathologists (P< 0·05). The EGBAS achieved a higher κ score (0·880, very good κ) than junior and senior pathologists (0·641 ± 0·088 and 0·729 ± 0·056). With EGBAS assistance, the overall accuracy (four-tier classification) of the pathologists increased from 66·49 ± 7·73% to 73·83 ± 5·73% (P< 0·05). The length of time for pathologists to manually complete the dataset was 461·44 ± 117·96 minutes; this time was reduced to 305·71 ± 82·43 minutes with EGBAS assistance (P = 0·00). CONCLUSIONS: The EGBAS is a promising system for improving the diagnosis ability and reducing the workload of pathologists.