Cargando…

Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke

BACKGROUND: Cognitive and mood problems have been highlighted as priorities in stroke research and guidelines recommend early screening. However, there is limited detail on the preferred approach. We aimed to (1) determine the optimal methods for evaluating psychological problems that pre-date strok...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quinn, Terence J, Taylor-Rowan, Martin, Elliott, Emma, Drozdowska, Bogna, McMahon, David, Broomfield, Niall M, Barber, Mark, MacLeod, Mary Joan, Cvoro, Vera, Byrne, Anthony, Ross, Sarah, Crow, Jennifer, Slade, Peter, Dawson, Jesse, Langhorne, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cccb.2022.100042
_version_ 1784820603736293376
author Quinn, Terence J
Taylor-Rowan, Martin
Elliott, Emma
Drozdowska, Bogna
McMahon, David
Broomfield, Niall M
Barber, Mark
MacLeod, Mary Joan
Cvoro, Vera
Byrne, Anthony
Ross, Sarah
Crow, Jennifer
Slade, Peter
Dawson, Jesse
Langhorne, Peter
author_facet Quinn, Terence J
Taylor-Rowan, Martin
Elliott, Emma
Drozdowska, Bogna
McMahon, David
Broomfield, Niall M
Barber, Mark
MacLeod, Mary Joan
Cvoro, Vera
Byrne, Anthony
Ross, Sarah
Crow, Jennifer
Slade, Peter
Dawson, Jesse
Langhorne, Peter
author_sort Quinn, Terence J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cognitive and mood problems have been highlighted as priorities in stroke research and guidelines recommend early screening. However, there is limited detail on the preferred approach. We aimed to (1) determine the optimal methods for evaluating psychological problems that pre-date stroke; (2) assess the test accuracy, feasibility and acceptability of brief cognitive and mood tests used at various time-points following stroke; (3) describe temporal changes in cognition and mood following stroke and explore predictors of change. METHODS: We established a multi-centre, prospective, observational cohort with acute stroke as the inception point – Assessing Post-stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE). We approached patients admitted with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) from 11 different hospital sites across the United Kingdom. Baseline demographics, clinical, functional, cognitive, and mood data were collected. Consenting stroke survivors were followed up with more extensive evaluations of cognition and mood at 1, 6, 12 and 18 months. RESULTS: Continuous recruitment was from February 2017 to February 2019. With 357 consented to full follow-up. Eighteen-month assessments were completed in September 2020 with permissions in-place for longer term in-person or electronic follow-up. A qualitative study has been completed, and a participant sample biobank and individual participant database are both available. DISCUSSION: The APPLE study will provide guidance on optimal tool selection for cognitive and mood assessment both before and after stroke, as well as information on prognosis and natural history of neuropsychological problems in stroke. The study data, neuroimaging and tissue biobank are all available as a resource for future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9616226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96162262022-11-01 Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke Quinn, Terence J Taylor-Rowan, Martin Elliott, Emma Drozdowska, Bogna McMahon, David Broomfield, Niall M Barber, Mark MacLeod, Mary Joan Cvoro, Vera Byrne, Anthony Ross, Sarah Crow, Jennifer Slade, Peter Dawson, Jesse Langhorne, Peter Cereb Circ Cogn Behav Article BACKGROUND: Cognitive and mood problems have been highlighted as priorities in stroke research and guidelines recommend early screening. However, there is limited detail on the preferred approach. We aimed to (1) determine the optimal methods for evaluating psychological problems that pre-date stroke; (2) assess the test accuracy, feasibility and acceptability of brief cognitive and mood tests used at various time-points following stroke; (3) describe temporal changes in cognition and mood following stroke and explore predictors of change. METHODS: We established a multi-centre, prospective, observational cohort with acute stroke as the inception point – Assessing Post-stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE). We approached patients admitted with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) from 11 different hospital sites across the United Kingdom. Baseline demographics, clinical, functional, cognitive, and mood data were collected. Consenting stroke survivors were followed up with more extensive evaluations of cognition and mood at 1, 6, 12 and 18 months. RESULTS: Continuous recruitment was from February 2017 to February 2019. With 357 consented to full follow-up. Eighteen-month assessments were completed in September 2020 with permissions in-place for longer term in-person or electronic follow-up. A qualitative study has been completed, and a participant sample biobank and individual participant database are both available. DISCUSSION: The APPLE study will provide guidance on optimal tool selection for cognitive and mood assessment both before and after stroke, as well as information on prognosis and natural history of neuropsychological problems in stroke. The study data, neuroimaging and tissue biobank are all available as a resource for future research. Elsevier 2022-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9616226/ /pubmed/36324404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cccb.2022.100042 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Quinn, Terence J
Taylor-Rowan, Martin
Elliott, Emma
Drozdowska, Bogna
McMahon, David
Broomfield, Niall M
Barber, Mark
MacLeod, Mary Joan
Cvoro, Vera
Byrne, Anthony
Ross, Sarah
Crow, Jennifer
Slade, Peter
Dawson, Jesse
Langhorne, Peter
Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke
title Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke
title_full Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke
title_fullStr Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke
title_full_unstemmed Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke
title_short Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke
title_sort research protocol – assessing post-stroke psychology longitudinal evaluation (apple) study: a prospective cohort study in stroke
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cccb.2022.100042
work_keys_str_mv AT quinnterencej researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT taylorrowanmartin researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT elliottemma researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT drozdowskabogna researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT mcmahondavid researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT broomfieldniallm researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT barbermark researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT macleodmaryjoan researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT cvorovera researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT byrneanthony researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT rosssarah researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT crowjennifer researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT sladepeter researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT dawsonjesse researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke
AT langhornepeter researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke