Cargando…
Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke
BACKGROUND: Cognitive and mood problems have been highlighted as priorities in stroke research and guidelines recommend early screening. However, there is limited detail on the preferred approach. We aimed to (1) determine the optimal methods for evaluating psychological problems that pre-date strok...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cccb.2022.100042 |
_version_ | 1784820603736293376 |
---|---|
author | Quinn, Terence J Taylor-Rowan, Martin Elliott, Emma Drozdowska, Bogna McMahon, David Broomfield, Niall M Barber, Mark MacLeod, Mary Joan Cvoro, Vera Byrne, Anthony Ross, Sarah Crow, Jennifer Slade, Peter Dawson, Jesse Langhorne, Peter |
author_facet | Quinn, Terence J Taylor-Rowan, Martin Elliott, Emma Drozdowska, Bogna McMahon, David Broomfield, Niall M Barber, Mark MacLeod, Mary Joan Cvoro, Vera Byrne, Anthony Ross, Sarah Crow, Jennifer Slade, Peter Dawson, Jesse Langhorne, Peter |
author_sort | Quinn, Terence J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cognitive and mood problems have been highlighted as priorities in stroke research and guidelines recommend early screening. However, there is limited detail on the preferred approach. We aimed to (1) determine the optimal methods for evaluating psychological problems that pre-date stroke; (2) assess the test accuracy, feasibility and acceptability of brief cognitive and mood tests used at various time-points following stroke; (3) describe temporal changes in cognition and mood following stroke and explore predictors of change. METHODS: We established a multi-centre, prospective, observational cohort with acute stroke as the inception point – Assessing Post-stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE). We approached patients admitted with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) from 11 different hospital sites across the United Kingdom. Baseline demographics, clinical, functional, cognitive, and mood data were collected. Consenting stroke survivors were followed up with more extensive evaluations of cognition and mood at 1, 6, 12 and 18 months. RESULTS: Continuous recruitment was from February 2017 to February 2019. With 357 consented to full follow-up. Eighteen-month assessments were completed in September 2020 with permissions in-place for longer term in-person or electronic follow-up. A qualitative study has been completed, and a participant sample biobank and individual participant database are both available. DISCUSSION: The APPLE study will provide guidance on optimal tool selection for cognitive and mood assessment both before and after stroke, as well as information on prognosis and natural history of neuropsychological problems in stroke. The study data, neuroimaging and tissue biobank are all available as a resource for future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9616226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96162262022-11-01 Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke Quinn, Terence J Taylor-Rowan, Martin Elliott, Emma Drozdowska, Bogna McMahon, David Broomfield, Niall M Barber, Mark MacLeod, Mary Joan Cvoro, Vera Byrne, Anthony Ross, Sarah Crow, Jennifer Slade, Peter Dawson, Jesse Langhorne, Peter Cereb Circ Cogn Behav Article BACKGROUND: Cognitive and mood problems have been highlighted as priorities in stroke research and guidelines recommend early screening. However, there is limited detail on the preferred approach. We aimed to (1) determine the optimal methods for evaluating psychological problems that pre-date stroke; (2) assess the test accuracy, feasibility and acceptability of brief cognitive and mood tests used at various time-points following stroke; (3) describe temporal changes in cognition and mood following stroke and explore predictors of change. METHODS: We established a multi-centre, prospective, observational cohort with acute stroke as the inception point – Assessing Post-stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE). We approached patients admitted with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) from 11 different hospital sites across the United Kingdom. Baseline demographics, clinical, functional, cognitive, and mood data were collected. Consenting stroke survivors were followed up with more extensive evaluations of cognition and mood at 1, 6, 12 and 18 months. RESULTS: Continuous recruitment was from February 2017 to February 2019. With 357 consented to full follow-up. Eighteen-month assessments were completed in September 2020 with permissions in-place for longer term in-person or electronic follow-up. A qualitative study has been completed, and a participant sample biobank and individual participant database are both available. DISCUSSION: The APPLE study will provide guidance on optimal tool selection for cognitive and mood assessment both before and after stroke, as well as information on prognosis and natural history of neuropsychological problems in stroke. The study data, neuroimaging and tissue biobank are all available as a resource for future research. Elsevier 2022-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9616226/ /pubmed/36324404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cccb.2022.100042 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Quinn, Terence J Taylor-Rowan, Martin Elliott, Emma Drozdowska, Bogna McMahon, David Broomfield, Niall M Barber, Mark MacLeod, Mary Joan Cvoro, Vera Byrne, Anthony Ross, Sarah Crow, Jennifer Slade, Peter Dawson, Jesse Langhorne, Peter Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke |
title | Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke |
title_full | Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke |
title_fullStr | Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke |
title_short | Research protocol – Assessing Post-Stroke Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (APPLE) study: A prospective cohort study in stroke |
title_sort | research protocol – assessing post-stroke psychology longitudinal evaluation (apple) study: a prospective cohort study in stroke |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cccb.2022.100042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quinnterencej researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT taylorrowanmartin researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT elliottemma researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT drozdowskabogna researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT mcmahondavid researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT broomfieldniallm researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT barbermark researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT macleodmaryjoan researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT cvorovera researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT byrneanthony researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT rosssarah researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT crowjennifer researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT sladepeter researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT dawsonjesse researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke AT langhornepeter researchprotocolassessingpoststrokepsychologylongitudinalevaluationapplestudyaprospectivecohortstudyinstroke |