Cargando…
Review of Autologous Fat Grafting in Postmastectomy Reconstruction Patients: Nonroutine Diagnostics and Oncologic Safety
Autologous fat grafting (FG) is increasingly used as an adjunctive reconstruction technique to augment volume, achieve symmetry, and improve contour deformities. This study aims to characterize the oncologic and surgical safety of FG in women undergoing autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) or impl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36320622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004579 |
_version_ | 1784820681961111552 |
---|---|
author | Sayyed, Adaah A. Perez-Alvarez, Idanis M. Singh, Tanvee King, Caroline A. Welschmeyer, Alexandra F. Bartholomew, Alexander J. Sher, Sarah Tousimis, Eleni A. Song, David H. Fan, Kenneth L. |
author_facet | Sayyed, Adaah A. Perez-Alvarez, Idanis M. Singh, Tanvee King, Caroline A. Welschmeyer, Alexandra F. Bartholomew, Alexander J. Sher, Sarah Tousimis, Eleni A. Song, David H. Fan, Kenneth L. |
author_sort | Sayyed, Adaah A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Autologous fat grafting (FG) is increasingly used as an adjunctive reconstruction technique to augment volume, achieve symmetry, and improve contour deformities. This study aims to characterize the oncologic and surgical safety of FG in women undergoing autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) or implant-based reconstruction (IBR). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients undergoing FG at a multi-site single health system between 2015 to 2018. A total of 228 eligible breasts from 155 patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were divided by reconstructive technique. Bivariate analyses compared baseline characteristics and post-FG outcomes. RESULTS: Mean age for patients undergoing ABR (129 breasts) was 52.8 years compared to 48.6 years for those undergoing IBR (99 breasts; P = 0.002). A heavier volume of fat was grafted per ABR breast (143.8mL) than per IBR breast (102.2mL; P = 0.002). Forty-seven (20.6%) breasts required FG revision, more frequently in ABR breasts (31.0%) than IBR breasts (7.1%; P < 0.001). Following FG, 17.5% of patients experienced a palpable mass, and 18.9% of breasts underwent nonroutine diagnostics or procedures, with no difference between ABR and IBR groups. Most biopsies noted benign findings such as fat necrosis (2.2%) or a benign mass (0.9%), with recurrence only noted in two patients (0.9%). Mean follow-up was 20.4 months. CONCLUSION: FG is a safe, surgically simple procedure more commonly performed in ABR breasts. FG use in ABR and IBR breasts is oncologically safe, with no impairment in breast surveillance and low rates of locoregional recurrence, but possibly increased incidence of nonroutine imaging and biopsies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9616633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96166332022-10-31 Review of Autologous Fat Grafting in Postmastectomy Reconstruction Patients: Nonroutine Diagnostics and Oncologic Safety Sayyed, Adaah A. Perez-Alvarez, Idanis M. Singh, Tanvee King, Caroline A. Welschmeyer, Alexandra F. Bartholomew, Alexander J. Sher, Sarah Tousimis, Eleni A. Song, David H. Fan, Kenneth L. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast Autologous fat grafting (FG) is increasingly used as an adjunctive reconstruction technique to augment volume, achieve symmetry, and improve contour deformities. This study aims to characterize the oncologic and surgical safety of FG in women undergoing autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) or implant-based reconstruction (IBR). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients undergoing FG at a multi-site single health system between 2015 to 2018. A total of 228 eligible breasts from 155 patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were divided by reconstructive technique. Bivariate analyses compared baseline characteristics and post-FG outcomes. RESULTS: Mean age for patients undergoing ABR (129 breasts) was 52.8 years compared to 48.6 years for those undergoing IBR (99 breasts; P = 0.002). A heavier volume of fat was grafted per ABR breast (143.8mL) than per IBR breast (102.2mL; P = 0.002). Forty-seven (20.6%) breasts required FG revision, more frequently in ABR breasts (31.0%) than IBR breasts (7.1%; P < 0.001). Following FG, 17.5% of patients experienced a palpable mass, and 18.9% of breasts underwent nonroutine diagnostics or procedures, with no difference between ABR and IBR groups. Most biopsies noted benign findings such as fat necrosis (2.2%) or a benign mass (0.9%), with recurrence only noted in two patients (0.9%). Mean follow-up was 20.4 months. CONCLUSION: FG is a safe, surgically simple procedure more commonly performed in ABR breasts. FG use in ABR and IBR breasts is oncologically safe, with no impairment in breast surveillance and low rates of locoregional recurrence, but possibly increased incidence of nonroutine imaging and biopsies. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9616633/ /pubmed/36320622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004579 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Breast Sayyed, Adaah A. Perez-Alvarez, Idanis M. Singh, Tanvee King, Caroline A. Welschmeyer, Alexandra F. Bartholomew, Alexander J. Sher, Sarah Tousimis, Eleni A. Song, David H. Fan, Kenneth L. Review of Autologous Fat Grafting in Postmastectomy Reconstruction Patients: Nonroutine Diagnostics and Oncologic Safety |
title | Review of Autologous Fat Grafting in Postmastectomy Reconstruction Patients: Nonroutine Diagnostics and Oncologic Safety |
title_full | Review of Autologous Fat Grafting in Postmastectomy Reconstruction Patients: Nonroutine Diagnostics and Oncologic Safety |
title_fullStr | Review of Autologous Fat Grafting in Postmastectomy Reconstruction Patients: Nonroutine Diagnostics and Oncologic Safety |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of Autologous Fat Grafting in Postmastectomy Reconstruction Patients: Nonroutine Diagnostics and Oncologic Safety |
title_short | Review of Autologous Fat Grafting in Postmastectomy Reconstruction Patients: Nonroutine Diagnostics and Oncologic Safety |
title_sort | review of autologous fat grafting in postmastectomy reconstruction patients: nonroutine diagnostics and oncologic safety |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36320622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sayyedadaaha reviewofautologousfatgraftinginpostmastectomyreconstructionpatientsnonroutinediagnosticsandoncologicsafety AT perezalvarezidanism reviewofautologousfatgraftinginpostmastectomyreconstructionpatientsnonroutinediagnosticsandoncologicsafety AT singhtanvee reviewofautologousfatgraftinginpostmastectomyreconstructionpatientsnonroutinediagnosticsandoncologicsafety AT kingcarolinea reviewofautologousfatgraftinginpostmastectomyreconstructionpatientsnonroutinediagnosticsandoncologicsafety AT welschmeyeralexandraf reviewofautologousfatgraftinginpostmastectomyreconstructionpatientsnonroutinediagnosticsandoncologicsafety AT bartholomewalexanderj reviewofautologousfatgraftinginpostmastectomyreconstructionpatientsnonroutinediagnosticsandoncologicsafety AT shersarah reviewofautologousfatgraftinginpostmastectomyreconstructionpatientsnonroutinediagnosticsandoncologicsafety AT tousimiselenia reviewofautologousfatgraftinginpostmastectomyreconstructionpatientsnonroutinediagnosticsandoncologicsafety AT songdavidh reviewofautologousfatgraftinginpostmastectomyreconstructionpatientsnonroutinediagnosticsandoncologicsafety AT fankennethl reviewofautologousfatgraftinginpostmastectomyreconstructionpatientsnonroutinediagnosticsandoncologicsafety |