Cargando…

Germline Testing and Somatic Tumor Testing for BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants in Ovarian Cancer: What Is the Optimal Sequence of Testing?

In 2020, ASCO recommended that all women with epithelial ovarian cancer have germline testing for BRCA1/2 mutations, and those without a germline pathogenic variant (PV) should have somatic tumor testing to determine eligibility for a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. Consequently, the majorit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, Janice S., Tinker, Anna V., Santos, Jennifer, Compton, Katie, Sun, Sophie, Schrader, Kasmintan A., Karsan, Aly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36265114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.22.00033
_version_ 1784820683973328896
author Kwon, Janice S.
Tinker, Anna V.
Santos, Jennifer
Compton, Katie
Sun, Sophie
Schrader, Kasmintan A.
Karsan, Aly
author_facet Kwon, Janice S.
Tinker, Anna V.
Santos, Jennifer
Compton, Katie
Sun, Sophie
Schrader, Kasmintan A.
Karsan, Aly
author_sort Kwon, Janice S.
collection PubMed
description In 2020, ASCO recommended that all women with epithelial ovarian cancer have germline testing for BRCA1/2 mutations, and those without a germline pathogenic variant (PV) should have somatic tumor testing to determine eligibility for a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. Consequently, the majority of patients with ovarian cancer will have both germline testing and somatic testing. An alternate strategy is tumor testing first and then germline testing if there is a PV in the tumor and/or significant family history. The objective was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the two testing strategies. METHODS: The Markov model compared the costs (US dollars) and benefits of two testing strategies for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: (1) ASCO strategy and (2) tumor testing triage for germline testing. Data were applied from SOLO-1, and costs were from wholesale acquisition prices, Medicare, and published sources. Sensitivity analyses accounted for uncertainty around various parameters. Monte Carlo simulation estimated the number tested and identified with germline and somatic BRCA PV for olaparib maintenance treatment annually in the US population. RESULTS: The ASCO strategy was more effective but more costly than tumor testing triage in identifying patients for olaparib, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $281,296 US dollars per progression-free life year gained. Assuming 10,000 eligible patients with ovarian cancer annually, Monte Carlo simulation yielded comparable numbers of patients with BRCA PV in the germline and tumor with the ASCO and tumor testing triage strategies (2,080 v 2,062, respectively), but substantially higher number of patients tested using the ASCO strategy (8,052 v 3,076). CONCLUSION: The ASCO strategy may identify more BRCA PVs but is not cost-effective. Tumor testing in epithelial ovarian cancer as triage for germline testing is the favored strategy in this health care system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9616645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96166452022-10-31 Germline Testing and Somatic Tumor Testing for BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants in Ovarian Cancer: What Is the Optimal Sequence of Testing? Kwon, Janice S. Tinker, Anna V. Santos, Jennifer Compton, Katie Sun, Sophie Schrader, Kasmintan A. Karsan, Aly JCO Precis Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS In 2020, ASCO recommended that all women with epithelial ovarian cancer have germline testing for BRCA1/2 mutations, and those without a germline pathogenic variant (PV) should have somatic tumor testing to determine eligibility for a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. Consequently, the majority of patients with ovarian cancer will have both germline testing and somatic testing. An alternate strategy is tumor testing first and then germline testing if there is a PV in the tumor and/or significant family history. The objective was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the two testing strategies. METHODS: The Markov model compared the costs (US dollars) and benefits of two testing strategies for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: (1) ASCO strategy and (2) tumor testing triage for germline testing. Data were applied from SOLO-1, and costs were from wholesale acquisition prices, Medicare, and published sources. Sensitivity analyses accounted for uncertainty around various parameters. Monte Carlo simulation estimated the number tested and identified with germline and somatic BRCA PV for olaparib maintenance treatment annually in the US population. RESULTS: The ASCO strategy was more effective but more costly than tumor testing triage in identifying patients for olaparib, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $281,296 US dollars per progression-free life year gained. Assuming 10,000 eligible patients with ovarian cancer annually, Monte Carlo simulation yielded comparable numbers of patients with BRCA PV in the germline and tumor with the ASCO and tumor testing triage strategies (2,080 v 2,062, respectively), but substantially higher number of patients tested using the ASCO strategy (8,052 v 3,076). CONCLUSION: The ASCO strategy may identify more BRCA PVs but is not cost-effective. Tumor testing in epithelial ovarian cancer as triage for germline testing is the favored strategy in this health care system. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9616645/ /pubmed/36265114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.22.00033 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Kwon, Janice S.
Tinker, Anna V.
Santos, Jennifer
Compton, Katie
Sun, Sophie
Schrader, Kasmintan A.
Karsan, Aly
Germline Testing and Somatic Tumor Testing for BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants in Ovarian Cancer: What Is the Optimal Sequence of Testing?
title Germline Testing and Somatic Tumor Testing for BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants in Ovarian Cancer: What Is the Optimal Sequence of Testing?
title_full Germline Testing and Somatic Tumor Testing for BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants in Ovarian Cancer: What Is the Optimal Sequence of Testing?
title_fullStr Germline Testing and Somatic Tumor Testing for BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants in Ovarian Cancer: What Is the Optimal Sequence of Testing?
title_full_unstemmed Germline Testing and Somatic Tumor Testing for BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants in Ovarian Cancer: What Is the Optimal Sequence of Testing?
title_short Germline Testing and Somatic Tumor Testing for BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants in Ovarian Cancer: What Is the Optimal Sequence of Testing?
title_sort germline testing and somatic tumor testing for brca1/2 pathogenic variants in ovarian cancer: what is the optimal sequence of testing?
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36265114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.22.00033
work_keys_str_mv AT kwonjanices germlinetestingandsomatictumortestingforbrca12pathogenicvariantsinovariancancerwhatistheoptimalsequenceoftesting
AT tinkerannav germlinetestingandsomatictumortestingforbrca12pathogenicvariantsinovariancancerwhatistheoptimalsequenceoftesting
AT santosjennifer germlinetestingandsomatictumortestingforbrca12pathogenicvariantsinovariancancerwhatistheoptimalsequenceoftesting
AT comptonkatie germlinetestingandsomatictumortestingforbrca12pathogenicvariantsinovariancancerwhatistheoptimalsequenceoftesting
AT sunsophie germlinetestingandsomatictumortestingforbrca12pathogenicvariantsinovariancancerwhatistheoptimalsequenceoftesting
AT schraderkasmintana germlinetestingandsomatictumortestingforbrca12pathogenicvariantsinovariancancerwhatistheoptimalsequenceoftesting
AT karsanaly germlinetestingandsomatictumortestingforbrca12pathogenicvariantsinovariancancerwhatistheoptimalsequenceoftesting