Cargando…

Risk of Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone Is 8 Times Lower with Megavoltage vs. Orthovoltage Radiation Therapy

BACKGROUND: The first-line treatment for most giant cell tumors (GCTs) of bone is surgical; radiotherapy (RT) is reserved for inoperable or refractory cases. While RT techniques have undergone a dramatic change over the past few decades, with the higher energy megavoltage RT replacing orthovoltage R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musharbash, Farah N., Edelstein, Alexander, El Abiad, Jad M., Levin, Adam S., Alcorn, Sara R., Morris, Carol D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36311815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7216296
_version_ 1784820684671680512
author Musharbash, Farah N.
Edelstein, Alexander
El Abiad, Jad M.
Levin, Adam S.
Alcorn, Sara R.
Morris, Carol D.
author_facet Musharbash, Farah N.
Edelstein, Alexander
El Abiad, Jad M.
Levin, Adam S.
Alcorn, Sara R.
Morris, Carol D.
author_sort Musharbash, Farah N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The first-line treatment for most giant cell tumors (GCTs) of bone is surgical; radiotherapy (RT) is reserved for inoperable or refractory cases. While RT techniques have undergone a dramatic change over the past few decades, with the higher energy megavoltage RT replacing orthovoltage RT, concerns for high rates of malignant transformation following RT have limited its use. Evidence suggests a lower incidence of secondary malignancy after treatment with megavoltage compared with orthovoltage RT, but this has not been studied in GCTs. Our main purpose was to compare the incidence of malignant transformation of GCTB between patients treated with orthovoltage vs. megavoltage RT. METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify studies reporting GCTBs treated with RT from 01/1900 through 12/2019. Studies that did not report RT modality or separate orthovoltage and megavoltage results were excluded. Included in the analysis were 6 patients from our institution. Primary outcome was the incidence of malignant transformation; secondary outcomes were time to transformation and incidence of local recurrence. Fisher's exact tests and independent sample t-tests were used, and significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included, which reported on 168 GCTBs treated with orthovoltage and 393 treated with megavoltage RT. Transformation incidence was 14% (n = 24) for orthovoltage and 1.8% (n = 7) for megavoltage RT, an 8-fold difference (odds ratio (OR) 9.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9–22, p < 0.001). Mean time to transformation was 8.7 years for orthovoltage and 11.2 years for megavoltage RT (p=0.28). Incidence of local recurrence was 38% (63/167) for orthovoltage and 17% (66/393) for megavoltage RT (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.0–4.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing a malignancy after RT of GCTB is 8 times lower with megavoltage than with orthovoltage. Malignant transformation with megavoltage, while not zero, is lower than that in historical series. Use of modern RT techniques in inoperable or refractory GCTB may be appropriate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9616653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96166532022-10-29 Risk of Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone Is 8 Times Lower with Megavoltage vs. Orthovoltage Radiation Therapy Musharbash, Farah N. Edelstein, Alexander El Abiad, Jad M. Levin, Adam S. Alcorn, Sara R. Morris, Carol D. Sarcoma Research Article BACKGROUND: The first-line treatment for most giant cell tumors (GCTs) of bone is surgical; radiotherapy (RT) is reserved for inoperable or refractory cases. While RT techniques have undergone a dramatic change over the past few decades, with the higher energy megavoltage RT replacing orthovoltage RT, concerns for high rates of malignant transformation following RT have limited its use. Evidence suggests a lower incidence of secondary malignancy after treatment with megavoltage compared with orthovoltage RT, but this has not been studied in GCTs. Our main purpose was to compare the incidence of malignant transformation of GCTB between patients treated with orthovoltage vs. megavoltage RT. METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify studies reporting GCTBs treated with RT from 01/1900 through 12/2019. Studies that did not report RT modality or separate orthovoltage and megavoltage results were excluded. Included in the analysis were 6 patients from our institution. Primary outcome was the incidence of malignant transformation; secondary outcomes were time to transformation and incidence of local recurrence. Fisher's exact tests and independent sample t-tests were used, and significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included, which reported on 168 GCTBs treated with orthovoltage and 393 treated with megavoltage RT. Transformation incidence was 14% (n = 24) for orthovoltage and 1.8% (n = 7) for megavoltage RT, an 8-fold difference (odds ratio (OR) 9.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9–22, p < 0.001). Mean time to transformation was 8.7 years for orthovoltage and 11.2 years for megavoltage RT (p=0.28). Incidence of local recurrence was 38% (63/167) for orthovoltage and 17% (66/393) for megavoltage RT (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.0–4.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing a malignancy after RT of GCTB is 8 times lower with megavoltage than with orthovoltage. Malignant transformation with megavoltage, while not zero, is lower than that in historical series. Use of modern RT techniques in inoperable or refractory GCTB may be appropriate. Hindawi 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9616653/ /pubmed/36311815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7216296 Text en Copyright © 2022 Farah N. Musharbash et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Musharbash, Farah N.
Edelstein, Alexander
El Abiad, Jad M.
Levin, Adam S.
Alcorn, Sara R.
Morris, Carol D.
Risk of Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone Is 8 Times Lower with Megavoltage vs. Orthovoltage Radiation Therapy
title Risk of Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone Is 8 Times Lower with Megavoltage vs. Orthovoltage Radiation Therapy
title_full Risk of Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone Is 8 Times Lower with Megavoltage vs. Orthovoltage Radiation Therapy
title_fullStr Risk of Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone Is 8 Times Lower with Megavoltage vs. Orthovoltage Radiation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Risk of Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone Is 8 Times Lower with Megavoltage vs. Orthovoltage Radiation Therapy
title_short Risk of Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone Is 8 Times Lower with Megavoltage vs. Orthovoltage Radiation Therapy
title_sort risk of malignant transformation of giant cell tumors of bone is 8 times lower with megavoltage vs. orthovoltage radiation therapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36311815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7216296
work_keys_str_mv AT musharbashfarahn riskofmalignanttransformationofgiantcelltumorsofboneis8timeslowerwithmegavoltagevsorthovoltageradiationtherapy
AT edelsteinalexander riskofmalignanttransformationofgiantcelltumorsofboneis8timeslowerwithmegavoltagevsorthovoltageradiationtherapy
AT elabiadjadm riskofmalignanttransformationofgiantcelltumorsofboneis8timeslowerwithmegavoltagevsorthovoltageradiationtherapy
AT levinadams riskofmalignanttransformationofgiantcelltumorsofboneis8timeslowerwithmegavoltagevsorthovoltageradiationtherapy
AT alcornsarar riskofmalignanttransformationofgiantcelltumorsofboneis8timeslowerwithmegavoltagevsorthovoltageradiationtherapy
AT morriscarold riskofmalignanttransformationofgiantcelltumorsofboneis8timeslowerwithmegavoltagevsorthovoltageradiationtherapy