Cargando…

Handgrip strength and risk of cognitive outcomes: new prospective study and meta-analysis of 16 observational cohort studies

Handgrip strength (HGS), a measure of muscular strength, might be a risk indicator for cognitive functioning, but the evidence is not consistent. Using a new prospective study and meta-analysis of published observational cohort studies, we aimed to evaluate the prospective associations of HGS with p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kunutsor, Setor K., Isiozor, Nzechukwu M., Voutilainen, Ari, Laukkanen, Jari A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35013908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11357-022-00514-6
_version_ 1784820753182490624
author Kunutsor, Setor K.
Isiozor, Nzechukwu M.
Voutilainen, Ari
Laukkanen, Jari A.
author_facet Kunutsor, Setor K.
Isiozor, Nzechukwu M.
Voutilainen, Ari
Laukkanen, Jari A.
author_sort Kunutsor, Setor K.
collection PubMed
description Handgrip strength (HGS), a measure of muscular strength, might be a risk indicator for cognitive functioning, but the evidence is not consistent. Using a new prospective study and meta-analysis of published observational cohort studies, we aimed to evaluate the prospective associations of HGS with poor cognitive outcomes including cognitive impairment, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Handgrip strength, measured using a Martin-Balloon-Vigorimeter, was assessed at baseline in a population-based sample of 852 men and women with good cognitive function in the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease cohort. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for cognitive outcomes. Relevant published studies were sought in MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science from inception until October 2021 and pooled using random effects meta-analysis. During a median follow-up of 16.6 years, 229 dementia cases were recorded. Comparing extreme tertiles of HGS, the multivariable adjusted HR (95% CI) for dementia, AD and vascular dementia was 0.77 (0.55–1.07), 0.75 (0.52–1.10) and 0.49 (0.16–1.48), respectively. In a meta-analysis of 16 population-based prospective cohort studies (including the current study) comprising 180,920 participants, the pooled multivariable adjusted relative risks (95% CIs) comparing the top vs bottom thirds of HGS levels were as follows: 0.58 (0.52–0.65) for cognitive impairment; 0.37 (0.07–1.85) for cognitive decline; 0.73 (0.62–0.86) for dementia; 0.68 (0.53–0.87) for AD; and 0.48 (0.32–0.73) for vascular dementia. GRADE quality of evidence ranged from low to very low. Meta-analysis of aggregate prospective data suggests that HGS may be a risk indicator for poor cognitive outcomes such as cognitive impairment, dementia and AD. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO 2021: CRD42021237750. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11357-022-00514-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9616970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96169702022-10-30 Handgrip strength and risk of cognitive outcomes: new prospective study and meta-analysis of 16 observational cohort studies Kunutsor, Setor K. Isiozor, Nzechukwu M. Voutilainen, Ari Laukkanen, Jari A. GeroScience Original Article Handgrip strength (HGS), a measure of muscular strength, might be a risk indicator for cognitive functioning, but the evidence is not consistent. Using a new prospective study and meta-analysis of published observational cohort studies, we aimed to evaluate the prospective associations of HGS with poor cognitive outcomes including cognitive impairment, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Handgrip strength, measured using a Martin-Balloon-Vigorimeter, was assessed at baseline in a population-based sample of 852 men and women with good cognitive function in the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease cohort. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for cognitive outcomes. Relevant published studies were sought in MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science from inception until October 2021 and pooled using random effects meta-analysis. During a median follow-up of 16.6 years, 229 dementia cases were recorded. Comparing extreme tertiles of HGS, the multivariable adjusted HR (95% CI) for dementia, AD and vascular dementia was 0.77 (0.55–1.07), 0.75 (0.52–1.10) and 0.49 (0.16–1.48), respectively. In a meta-analysis of 16 population-based prospective cohort studies (including the current study) comprising 180,920 participants, the pooled multivariable adjusted relative risks (95% CIs) comparing the top vs bottom thirds of HGS levels were as follows: 0.58 (0.52–0.65) for cognitive impairment; 0.37 (0.07–1.85) for cognitive decline; 0.73 (0.62–0.86) for dementia; 0.68 (0.53–0.87) for AD; and 0.48 (0.32–0.73) for vascular dementia. GRADE quality of evidence ranged from low to very low. Meta-analysis of aggregate prospective data suggests that HGS may be a risk indicator for poor cognitive outcomes such as cognitive impairment, dementia and AD. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO 2021: CRD42021237750. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11357-022-00514-6. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9616970/ /pubmed/35013908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11357-022-00514-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Kunutsor, Setor K.
Isiozor, Nzechukwu M.
Voutilainen, Ari
Laukkanen, Jari A.
Handgrip strength and risk of cognitive outcomes: new prospective study and meta-analysis of 16 observational cohort studies
title Handgrip strength and risk of cognitive outcomes: new prospective study and meta-analysis of 16 observational cohort studies
title_full Handgrip strength and risk of cognitive outcomes: new prospective study and meta-analysis of 16 observational cohort studies
title_fullStr Handgrip strength and risk of cognitive outcomes: new prospective study and meta-analysis of 16 observational cohort studies
title_full_unstemmed Handgrip strength and risk of cognitive outcomes: new prospective study and meta-analysis of 16 observational cohort studies
title_short Handgrip strength and risk of cognitive outcomes: new prospective study and meta-analysis of 16 observational cohort studies
title_sort handgrip strength and risk of cognitive outcomes: new prospective study and meta-analysis of 16 observational cohort studies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35013908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11357-022-00514-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kunutsorsetork handgripstrengthandriskofcognitiveoutcomesnewprospectivestudyandmetaanalysisof16observationalcohortstudies
AT isiozornzechukwum handgripstrengthandriskofcognitiveoutcomesnewprospectivestudyandmetaanalysisof16observationalcohortstudies
AT voutilainenari handgripstrengthandriskofcognitiveoutcomesnewprospectivestudyandmetaanalysisof16observationalcohortstudies
AT laukkanenjaria handgripstrengthandriskofcognitiveoutcomesnewprospectivestudyandmetaanalysisof16observationalcohortstudies