Cargando…

Combined Effect of Platelet-Rich Fibrin Matrix (PRFM) and Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (DFDBA) in Immediate Implant Placement: A Single-Arm Clinical Trial

Introduction Placement of immediate implants in contrast to delayed implant placement may be favorable. The factors contributing to this are shortened overall treatment time, aid in ideal orientation and fixture placement, bone preservation following extraction, and achieving optimal aesthetics invo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhombe, Komal R, Bajaj, Pavan, Mundada, Bhushan, Dhadse, Prasad, Subhadarsanee, Chitrika, Oza, Ranu R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324343
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29728
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction Placement of immediate implants in contrast to delayed implant placement may be favorable. The factors contributing to this are shortened overall treatment time, aid in ideal orientation and fixture placement, bone preservation following extraction, and achieving optimal aesthetics involving soft tissue. However, the gap distance between the surface of the implant and the buccal bony wall during implant placement is critical for subsequent bone healing in a fresh extraction socket. Considering that as the gap broadens, the amount of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) decreases, causing an apical shift of the highest bone-implant contact. Incorporating a bone substitute material (BSM) within the fixture-socket gap preserves alveolar ridge volume by minimizing socket remodeling and encouraging de-novo bone formation. Aim and objectives To evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin matrix (PRFM) and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in fresh extraction socket with simultaneous implant placement. Methods Implants were immediately placed in 12 patients following a two-stage submerged protocol. The combination of PRFM and DFDBA was used to fill the gap between the implant body and the surrounding socket wall. The final restoration was placed after 3 months following implant placement. The full mouth plaque, gingival bleeding index, and gingival esthetics scores were assessed at baseline, 3, and 6 months. The crestal changes were evaluated using intraoral periapical radiographs (IOPA) at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained at baseline and 6 months after implant loading to analyze the buccolingual changes. Results At 6 months follow-up, the coronal bone remodeling detected on CBCT revealed a minimal (0.1 mm) narrowing of the alveolar ridge in a buccolingual direction, with a mean bone loss of 0.10+0.09, which was statistically non-significant (p > 0.05). Implant success was 100% at 6 months after loading as determined by Akbrektsson’s criteria for implant success. Conclusions The adjunctive use of PRFM with DFDBA following immediate implant placement yielded a significant reduction in bone resorption and maintenance of buccolingual dimensions.