Cargando…
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback
BACKGROUND: Many implementation efforts fail, even with highly developed plans for execution, because contextual factors can be powerful forces working against implementation in the real world. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is one of the most commonly used determinant...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0 |
_version_ | 1784820796473999360 |
---|---|
author | Damschroder, Laura J. Reardon, Caitlin M. Widerquist, Marilla A. Opra Lowery, Julie |
author_facet | Damschroder, Laura J. Reardon, Caitlin M. Widerquist, Marilla A. Opra Lowery, Julie |
author_sort | Damschroder, Laura J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many implementation efforts fail, even with highly developed plans for execution, because contextual factors can be powerful forces working against implementation in the real world. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is one of the most commonly used determinant frameworks to assess these contextual factors; however, it has been over 10 years since publication and there is a need for updates. The purpose of this project was to elicit feedback from experienced CFIR users to inform updates to the framework. METHODS: User feedback was obtained from two sources: (1) a literature review with a systematic search; and (2) a survey of authors who used the CFIR in a published study. Data were combined across both sources and reviewed to identify themes; a consensus approach was used to finalize all CFIR updates. The VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System IRB declared this study exempt from the requirements of 38 CFR 16 based on category 2. RESULTS: The systematic search yielded 376 articles that contained the CFIR in the title and/or abstract and 334 unique authors with contact information; 59 articles included feedback on the CFIR. Forty percent (n = 134/334) of authors completed the survey. The CFIR received positive ratings on most framework sensibility items (e.g., applicability, usability), but respondents also provided recommendations for changes. Overall, updates to the CFIR include revisions to existing domains and constructs as well as the addition, removal, or relocation of constructs. These changes address important critiques of the CFIR, including better centering innovation recipients and adding determinants to equity in implementation. CONCLUSION: The updates in the CFIR reflect feedback from a growing community of CFIR users. Although there are many updates, constructs can be mapped back to the original CFIR to ensure longitudinal consistency. We encourage users to continue critiquing the CFIR, facilitating the evolution of the framework as implementation science advances. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9617234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96172342022-10-30 The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback Damschroder, Laura J. Reardon, Caitlin M. Widerquist, Marilla A. Opra Lowery, Julie Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Many implementation efforts fail, even with highly developed plans for execution, because contextual factors can be powerful forces working against implementation in the real world. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is one of the most commonly used determinant frameworks to assess these contextual factors; however, it has been over 10 years since publication and there is a need for updates. The purpose of this project was to elicit feedback from experienced CFIR users to inform updates to the framework. METHODS: User feedback was obtained from two sources: (1) a literature review with a systematic search; and (2) a survey of authors who used the CFIR in a published study. Data were combined across both sources and reviewed to identify themes; a consensus approach was used to finalize all CFIR updates. The VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System IRB declared this study exempt from the requirements of 38 CFR 16 based on category 2. RESULTS: The systematic search yielded 376 articles that contained the CFIR in the title and/or abstract and 334 unique authors with contact information; 59 articles included feedback on the CFIR. Forty percent (n = 134/334) of authors completed the survey. The CFIR received positive ratings on most framework sensibility items (e.g., applicability, usability), but respondents also provided recommendations for changes. Overall, updates to the CFIR include revisions to existing domains and constructs as well as the addition, removal, or relocation of constructs. These changes address important critiques of the CFIR, including better centering innovation recipients and adding determinants to equity in implementation. CONCLUSION: The updates in the CFIR reflect feedback from a growing community of CFIR users. Although there are many updates, constructs can be mapped back to the original CFIR to ensure longitudinal consistency. We encourage users to continue critiquing the CFIR, facilitating the evolution of the framework as implementation science advances. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0. BioMed Central 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9617234/ /pubmed/36309746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Damschroder, Laura J. Reardon, Caitlin M. Widerquist, Marilla A. Opra Lowery, Julie The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback |
title | The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback |
title_full | The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback |
title_fullStr | The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback |
title_full_unstemmed | The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback |
title_short | The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback |
title_sort | updated consolidated framework for implementation research based on user feedback |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT damschroderlauraj theupdatedconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchbasedonuserfeedback AT reardoncaitlinm theupdatedconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchbasedonuserfeedback AT widerquistmarillaaopra theupdatedconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchbasedonuserfeedback AT loweryjulie theupdatedconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchbasedonuserfeedback AT damschroderlauraj updatedconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchbasedonuserfeedback AT reardoncaitlinm updatedconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchbasedonuserfeedback AT widerquistmarillaaopra updatedconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchbasedonuserfeedback AT loweryjulie updatedconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearchbasedonuserfeedback |