Cargando…
Automatic quantitative measurement of left atrial pressure using mitral regurgitation spectrum: clinical study on comparison with floating catheter
INTRODUCTION: To explore how to measure LAP(Eq) accurately and quantitatively, that is, the left atrial pressure (LAP) measured and calculated by equation method using mitral regurgitation spectrum. METHODS: The mitral regurgitation spectrum, pulmonary arteriolar wedge pressure (PAWP) and invasive a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36307894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00849-y |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: To explore how to measure LAP(Eq) accurately and quantitatively, that is, the left atrial pressure (LAP) measured and calculated by equation method using mitral regurgitation spectrum. METHODS: The mitral regurgitation spectrum, pulmonary arteriolar wedge pressure (PAWP) and invasive arterial systolic pressure of radial artery of 28 patients were collected simultaneously, including 3 patients with rheumatic heart disease, 15 patients with mitral valve prolapse and 10 patients with coronary artery bypass grafting, patients with moderate or above aortic stenosis were excluded. LAP(Bp) (Doppler sphygmomanometer method), LAP(Eq) (Equation method) and LAP(C) (Catheter method) were measured synchronously, and the measurement results of the three methods were compared and analyzed. A special intelligent Doppler spectrum analysis software was self-designed to accurately measure LAP(Eq). This study had been approved by the ethics committee of the Northern Theater General Hospital (K-2019-17), and applied for clinical trial (No. Chictr 190023812). RESULTS: It was found that there was no significant statistical difference between the measurement results of LAP(C) and LAP(Eq) (t = 0.954, P = 0.348), and significant correlation between the two methods [r = 0.908(0.844, 0.964), P < 0.001]. Although the measurement results of LAP(C) and LAP(BP) are consistent in the condition of non-severe eccentric mitral regurgitation, there are significant differences in the overall case and weak correlation between the two methods [r = 0.210, (−0.101, 0.510), P = 0.090]. In MVP patients with P1 or P3 prolapse, the peak pressure difference of MR was underestimated due to the serious eccentricity of MR, which affected the accuracy of LAP(BP) measurement. CONCLUSIONS: It was shown that there is a good correlation between LAP(Eq) and LAP(C), which verifies that the non-invasive and direct quantitative measurement of left atrial pressure based on mitral regurgitation spectrum is feasible and has a good application prospect. |
---|