Cargando…

A study on prescriptions contributing to the risk of high anticholinergic burden in adults with intellectual disabilities: retrospective record linkage study

BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities may face a disproportionate risk of experiencing high anticholinergic burden, and its negative sequalae, from a range of medications, and at younger ages than the general population, but there has been little previous study. Our aim was to determine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laura Ward, McKernan, Cooper, Sally-Ann, Henderson, Angela, Stanley, Bethany, Greenlaw, Nicola, Pacitti, Christine, Cairns, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12991-022-00418-x
_version_ 1784820814378434560
author Laura Ward, McKernan
Cooper, Sally-Ann
Henderson, Angela
Stanley, Bethany
Greenlaw, Nicola
Pacitti, Christine
Cairns, Deborah
author_facet Laura Ward, McKernan
Cooper, Sally-Ann
Henderson, Angela
Stanley, Bethany
Greenlaw, Nicola
Pacitti, Christine
Cairns, Deborah
author_sort Laura Ward, McKernan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities may face a disproportionate risk of experiencing high anticholinergic burden, and its negative sequalae, from a range of medications, and at younger ages than the general population, but there has been little previous study. Our aim was to determine the source of anticholinergic burden from prescribed medication. METHODS: Retrospective matched observational study using record linkage. Adults with (n = 4,305), and without (n = 12,915), intellectual disabilities matched by age-, sex- and neighbourhood deprivation. The main outcome measure was the prescription of long-term (approximately 12 months use) anticholinergic medications overall (classified according to the Anticholinergic Risk Scale [ARS]), by drug class, individual drugs, and polypharmacy. RESULTS: Adults with n = 1,654 (38.4%), and without n = 3,047 (23.6%), intellectual disabilities were prescribed medications long-term with anticholinergic effects. Of those on such drugs, adults with intellectual disabilities were most likely to be on central nervous system (62.6%), gastrointestinal (46.7%), and cardiovascular (28.4%) medications. They were prescribed more central nervous system, gynaecological/urinary tract, musculoskeletal, and respiratory medications, and less cardiovascular, infection, and endocrine medications than their matched comparators. Regardless of age, sex, or neighbourhood deprivation, adults with intellectual disabilities had greater odds of being prescribed antipsychotics (OR = 5.37 [4.40–6.57], p < 0.001), antiepileptics (OR = 2.57 [2.22–2.99], p < 0.001), and anxiolytics/hypnotics (OR = 1.28 [1.06–1.56], p = 0.012). Compared to the general population, adults with intellectual disabilities were more likely to be exposed to overall anticholinergic polypharmacy (OR = 1.48 [1.33–1.66], p < 0.001), and to psychotropic polypharmacy (OR = 2.79 [2.41–3.23], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with intellectual disabilities are exposed to a greater risk of having very high anticholinergic burden through polypharmacy from several classes of medications, which may be prescribed by several different prescribers. There is a need for evidence-based recommendations specifically about people with intellectual disabilities with multiple physical and mental ill-health conditions to optimise medication use, reduce inappropriate prescribing and adverse anticholinergic effects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12991-022-00418-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9617313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96173132022-10-30 A study on prescriptions contributing to the risk of high anticholinergic burden in adults with intellectual disabilities: retrospective record linkage study Laura Ward, McKernan Cooper, Sally-Ann Henderson, Angela Stanley, Bethany Greenlaw, Nicola Pacitti, Christine Cairns, Deborah Ann Gen Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities may face a disproportionate risk of experiencing high anticholinergic burden, and its negative sequalae, from a range of medications, and at younger ages than the general population, but there has been little previous study. Our aim was to determine the source of anticholinergic burden from prescribed medication. METHODS: Retrospective matched observational study using record linkage. Adults with (n = 4,305), and without (n = 12,915), intellectual disabilities matched by age-, sex- and neighbourhood deprivation. The main outcome measure was the prescription of long-term (approximately 12 months use) anticholinergic medications overall (classified according to the Anticholinergic Risk Scale [ARS]), by drug class, individual drugs, and polypharmacy. RESULTS: Adults with n = 1,654 (38.4%), and without n = 3,047 (23.6%), intellectual disabilities were prescribed medications long-term with anticholinergic effects. Of those on such drugs, adults with intellectual disabilities were most likely to be on central nervous system (62.6%), gastrointestinal (46.7%), and cardiovascular (28.4%) medications. They were prescribed more central nervous system, gynaecological/urinary tract, musculoskeletal, and respiratory medications, and less cardiovascular, infection, and endocrine medications than their matched comparators. Regardless of age, sex, or neighbourhood deprivation, adults with intellectual disabilities had greater odds of being prescribed antipsychotics (OR = 5.37 [4.40–6.57], p < 0.001), antiepileptics (OR = 2.57 [2.22–2.99], p < 0.001), and anxiolytics/hypnotics (OR = 1.28 [1.06–1.56], p = 0.012). Compared to the general population, adults with intellectual disabilities were more likely to be exposed to overall anticholinergic polypharmacy (OR = 1.48 [1.33–1.66], p < 0.001), and to psychotropic polypharmacy (OR = 2.79 [2.41–3.23], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with intellectual disabilities are exposed to a greater risk of having very high anticholinergic burden through polypharmacy from several classes of medications, which may be prescribed by several different prescribers. There is a need for evidence-based recommendations specifically about people with intellectual disabilities with multiple physical and mental ill-health conditions to optimise medication use, reduce inappropriate prescribing and adverse anticholinergic effects. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12991-022-00418-x. BioMed Central 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9617313/ /pubmed/36309752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12991-022-00418-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Laura Ward, McKernan
Cooper, Sally-Ann
Henderson, Angela
Stanley, Bethany
Greenlaw, Nicola
Pacitti, Christine
Cairns, Deborah
A study on prescriptions contributing to the risk of high anticholinergic burden in adults with intellectual disabilities: retrospective record linkage study
title A study on prescriptions contributing to the risk of high anticholinergic burden in adults with intellectual disabilities: retrospective record linkage study
title_full A study on prescriptions contributing to the risk of high anticholinergic burden in adults with intellectual disabilities: retrospective record linkage study
title_fullStr A study on prescriptions contributing to the risk of high anticholinergic burden in adults with intellectual disabilities: retrospective record linkage study
title_full_unstemmed A study on prescriptions contributing to the risk of high anticholinergic burden in adults with intellectual disabilities: retrospective record linkage study
title_short A study on prescriptions contributing to the risk of high anticholinergic burden in adults with intellectual disabilities: retrospective record linkage study
title_sort study on prescriptions contributing to the risk of high anticholinergic burden in adults with intellectual disabilities: retrospective record linkage study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12991-022-00418-x
work_keys_str_mv AT laurawardmckernan astudyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy
AT coopersallyann astudyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy
AT hendersonangela astudyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy
AT stanleybethany astudyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy
AT greenlawnicola astudyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy
AT pacittichristine astudyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy
AT cairnsdeborah astudyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy
AT laurawardmckernan studyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy
AT coopersallyann studyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy
AT hendersonangela studyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy
AT stanleybethany studyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy
AT greenlawnicola studyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy
AT pacittichristine studyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy
AT cairnsdeborah studyonprescriptionscontributingtotheriskofhighanticholinergicburdeninadultswithintellectualdisabilitiesretrospectiverecordlinkagestudy