Cargando…
Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Carefully conducted systematic reviews (SRs) can provide reliable evidence on the effectiveness of treatment strategies for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Nevertheless, the reliability of SR results can be limited by methodological flaws. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the method...
Autores principales: | Zhong, Claire C. W., Zhao, Jinglun, Wong, Charlene H. L., Wu, Irene X. Y., Mao, Chen, Yeung, Jerry W. F., Chung, Vincent C. H. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-022-01100-w |
Ejemplares similares
-
Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study
por: Ho, Leonard, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Methodological quality of systematic reviews on interventions for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
por: Wu, Irene XY, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Chinese herbal medicine: a methodological survey
por: Cheung, Andy K. L., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Methodological quality of meta-analyses on treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool
por: Ho, Robin ST, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Chinese herbal medicine for functional dyspepsia: a network meta-analysis of prokinetic-controlled randomised trials
por: Ho, Leonard, et al.
Publicado: (2021)