Cargando…
Predicting risk of sepsis, comparison between machine learning methods: a case study of a Virginia hospital
Sepsis is an inflammation caused by the body's systemic response to an infection. The infection could be a result of many diseases, such as pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and other illnesses. Some of its symptoms are fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, etc. Unfortunately, sepsis remains a criti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36307887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00843-4 |
_version_ | 1784820827033698304 |
---|---|
author | Barghi, Behrad Azadeh-Fard, Nasibeh |
author_facet | Barghi, Behrad Azadeh-Fard, Nasibeh |
author_sort | Barghi, Behrad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sepsis is an inflammation caused by the body's systemic response to an infection. The infection could be a result of many diseases, such as pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and other illnesses. Some of its symptoms are fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, etc. Unfortunately, sepsis remains a critical problem at the hospitals and leads to many issues, such as increasing mortality rate, health care costs, and health care utilization. Early detection of sepsis in patients can help respond quickly, take preventive actions, and prevent major issues. The main aim of this study is to predict the risk of sepsis by utilizing the patient’s demographic and clinical information, i.e., patient’s gender, age, severity level, mortality risk, admit type along with hospital length of stay. Six machine learning approaches, Logistic Regression (LR), Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Boosted Tree, Classification and Regression Tree (CART), and Bootstrap Forest are used to predict the risk of sepsis. The results showed that different machine learning methods have other performances in terms of various measures. For instance, the Bootstrap Forest machine learning method exhibited the highest performance in AUC and R-square or SVM and Boosted Tree showed the highest performance in terms of misclassification rate. The Bootstrap Forest can be considered the best machine learning method in predicting sepsis regarding applied features in this research, mainly because it showed superior performance and efficiency in two performance measures: AUC and R-square. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9617383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96173832022-10-30 Predicting risk of sepsis, comparison between machine learning methods: a case study of a Virginia hospital Barghi, Behrad Azadeh-Fard, Nasibeh Eur J Med Res Research Sepsis is an inflammation caused by the body's systemic response to an infection. The infection could be a result of many diseases, such as pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and other illnesses. Some of its symptoms are fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, etc. Unfortunately, sepsis remains a critical problem at the hospitals and leads to many issues, such as increasing mortality rate, health care costs, and health care utilization. Early detection of sepsis in patients can help respond quickly, take preventive actions, and prevent major issues. The main aim of this study is to predict the risk of sepsis by utilizing the patient’s demographic and clinical information, i.e., patient’s gender, age, severity level, mortality risk, admit type along with hospital length of stay. Six machine learning approaches, Logistic Regression (LR), Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Boosted Tree, Classification and Regression Tree (CART), and Bootstrap Forest are used to predict the risk of sepsis. The results showed that different machine learning methods have other performances in terms of various measures. For instance, the Bootstrap Forest machine learning method exhibited the highest performance in AUC and R-square or SVM and Boosted Tree showed the highest performance in terms of misclassification rate. The Bootstrap Forest can be considered the best machine learning method in predicting sepsis regarding applied features in this research, mainly because it showed superior performance and efficiency in two performance measures: AUC and R-square. BioMed Central 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9617383/ /pubmed/36307887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00843-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Barghi, Behrad Azadeh-Fard, Nasibeh Predicting risk of sepsis, comparison between machine learning methods: a case study of a Virginia hospital |
title | Predicting risk of sepsis, comparison between machine learning methods: a case study of a Virginia hospital |
title_full | Predicting risk of sepsis, comparison between machine learning methods: a case study of a Virginia hospital |
title_fullStr | Predicting risk of sepsis, comparison between machine learning methods: a case study of a Virginia hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting risk of sepsis, comparison between machine learning methods: a case study of a Virginia hospital |
title_short | Predicting risk of sepsis, comparison between machine learning methods: a case study of a Virginia hospital |
title_sort | predicting risk of sepsis, comparison between machine learning methods: a case study of a virginia hospital |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36307887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-022-00843-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barghibehrad predictingriskofsepsiscomparisonbetweenmachinelearningmethodsacasestudyofavirginiahospital AT azadehfardnasibeh predictingriskofsepsiscomparisonbetweenmachinelearningmethodsacasestudyofavirginiahospital |