Cargando…

Preventing Pain and Stress-Related Ill-Health in Employees: A 6-Months Follow-Up of a Psychosocial Program in a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose Pain and stress-related ill-health are major causes of long-term disability and sick leave. This study evaluated the effects of a brief psychosocial program, which previously has been tested for an at-risk population of employees. Methods The Effective Communication within the Organization (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zetterberg, Hedvig, Owiredua, Christiana, Åsenlöf, Pernilla, Lennartsson, Rebecca, Brodda Jansen, Gunilla, Boersma, Katja, Linton, Steven J., Reme, Silje E., Shaw, William, Nicholas, Michael, Flink, Ida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10074-3
_version_ 1784820862160994304
author Zetterberg, Hedvig
Owiredua, Christiana
Åsenlöf, Pernilla
Lennartsson, Rebecca
Brodda Jansen, Gunilla
Boersma, Katja
Linton, Steven J.
Reme, Silje E.
Shaw, William
Nicholas, Michael
Flink, Ida
author_facet Zetterberg, Hedvig
Owiredua, Christiana
Åsenlöf, Pernilla
Lennartsson, Rebecca
Brodda Jansen, Gunilla
Boersma, Katja
Linton, Steven J.
Reme, Silje E.
Shaw, William
Nicholas, Michael
Flink, Ida
author_sort Zetterberg, Hedvig
collection PubMed
description Purpose Pain and stress-related ill-health are major causes of long-term disability and sick leave. This study evaluated the effects of a brief psychosocial program, which previously has been tested for an at-risk population of employees. Methods The Effective Communication within the Organization (ECO) program, where supervisors and employees were trained in communication and problem solving, was compared to an active control consisting of psychoeducative lectures (PE) about pain and stress in a cluster randomized controlled trial. First-line supervisors were randomized to ECO or PE, and a total of 191 mainly female employees with self-reported pain and/or stress-related ill-health were included. The hybrid format programs consisted of 2–3 group sessions. Sick leave data was collected from social insurance registers, before and 6-months after the program. Secondary outcomes (work ability, work limitations, pain-disability risk, exhaustion symptoms, perceived stress, perceived health, quality of life, perceived communication and support from supervisors) were assessed at baseline, post intervention, and at 6-months follow-up. Results No effects were observed on primary or secondary outcome variables. Pain symptoms were common (89%), however a lower proportion (30%) were identified as at risk for long-term pain disability, which might explain the lack of evident effects. The Covid-19 pandemic affected participation rates and delivery of intervention. Conclusion In this study, preventive effects of the ECO program were not supported. Altogether, the findings point at the importance of selecting participants for prevention based on screening of psychosocial risk. Further research on workplace communication and support, and impact on employee health is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9617527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96175272022-10-31 Preventing Pain and Stress-Related Ill-Health in Employees: A 6-Months Follow-Up of a Psychosocial Program in a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Zetterberg, Hedvig Owiredua, Christiana Åsenlöf, Pernilla Lennartsson, Rebecca Brodda Jansen, Gunilla Boersma, Katja Linton, Steven J. Reme, Silje E. Shaw, William Nicholas, Michael Flink, Ida J Occup Rehabil Article Purpose Pain and stress-related ill-health are major causes of long-term disability and sick leave. This study evaluated the effects of a brief psychosocial program, which previously has been tested for an at-risk population of employees. Methods The Effective Communication within the Organization (ECO) program, where supervisors and employees were trained in communication and problem solving, was compared to an active control consisting of psychoeducative lectures (PE) about pain and stress in a cluster randomized controlled trial. First-line supervisors were randomized to ECO or PE, and a total of 191 mainly female employees with self-reported pain and/or stress-related ill-health were included. The hybrid format programs consisted of 2–3 group sessions. Sick leave data was collected from social insurance registers, before and 6-months after the program. Secondary outcomes (work ability, work limitations, pain-disability risk, exhaustion symptoms, perceived stress, perceived health, quality of life, perceived communication and support from supervisors) were assessed at baseline, post intervention, and at 6-months follow-up. Results No effects were observed on primary or secondary outcome variables. Pain symptoms were common (89%), however a lower proportion (30%) were identified as at risk for long-term pain disability, which might explain the lack of evident effects. The Covid-19 pandemic affected participation rates and delivery of intervention. Conclusion In this study, preventive effects of the ECO program were not supported. Altogether, the findings point at the importance of selecting participants for prevention based on screening of psychosocial risk. Further research on workplace communication and support, and impact on employee health is warranted. Springer US 2022-10-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9617527/ /pubmed/36308628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10074-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zetterberg, Hedvig
Owiredua, Christiana
Åsenlöf, Pernilla
Lennartsson, Rebecca
Brodda Jansen, Gunilla
Boersma, Katja
Linton, Steven J.
Reme, Silje E.
Shaw, William
Nicholas, Michael
Flink, Ida
Preventing Pain and Stress-Related Ill-Health in Employees: A 6-Months Follow-Up of a Psychosocial Program in a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title Preventing Pain and Stress-Related Ill-Health in Employees: A 6-Months Follow-Up of a Psychosocial Program in a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Preventing Pain and Stress-Related Ill-Health in Employees: A 6-Months Follow-Up of a Psychosocial Program in a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Preventing Pain and Stress-Related Ill-Health in Employees: A 6-Months Follow-Up of a Psychosocial Program in a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Preventing Pain and Stress-Related Ill-Health in Employees: A 6-Months Follow-Up of a Psychosocial Program in a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Preventing Pain and Stress-Related Ill-Health in Employees: A 6-Months Follow-Up of a Psychosocial Program in a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort preventing pain and stress-related ill-health in employees: a 6-months follow-up of a psychosocial program in a cluster randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10074-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zetterberghedvig preventingpainandstressrelatedillhealthinemployeesa6monthsfollowupofapsychosocialprograminaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT owireduachristiana preventingpainandstressrelatedillhealthinemployeesa6monthsfollowupofapsychosocialprograminaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT asenlofpernilla preventingpainandstressrelatedillhealthinemployeesa6monthsfollowupofapsychosocialprograminaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lennartssonrebecca preventingpainandstressrelatedillhealthinemployeesa6monthsfollowupofapsychosocialprograminaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT broddajansengunilla preventingpainandstressrelatedillhealthinemployeesa6monthsfollowupofapsychosocialprograminaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT boersmakatja preventingpainandstressrelatedillhealthinemployeesa6monthsfollowupofapsychosocialprograminaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lintonstevenj preventingpainandstressrelatedillhealthinemployeesa6monthsfollowupofapsychosocialprograminaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT remesiljee preventingpainandstressrelatedillhealthinemployeesa6monthsfollowupofapsychosocialprograminaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shawwilliam preventingpainandstressrelatedillhealthinemployeesa6monthsfollowupofapsychosocialprograminaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nicholasmichael preventingpainandstressrelatedillhealthinemployeesa6monthsfollowupofapsychosocialprograminaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT flinkida preventingpainandstressrelatedillhealthinemployeesa6monthsfollowupofapsychosocialprograminaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial