Cargando…

Comparison of two different antiseptics regarding intracutaneous microbial load after preoperative skin cleansing in total knee and hip arthroplasties

Periprosthetic infections (PPIs) are a serious concern in total knee and hip arthroplasty, and they have an increasing incidence. To prevent PPI, preoperative skin disinfection, as a key element of antisepsis, represents an important part of infection prevention. However, no specific antiseptic agen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Böhle, Sabrina, Vogel, Anna-Maria, Matziolis, Georg, Strube, Patrick, Rohe, Sebastian, Brodt, Steffen, Mastrocola, Mario, Eijer, Henk, Rödel, Jürgen, Lindemann, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23070-7
_version_ 1784820924247179264
author Böhle, Sabrina
Vogel, Anna-Maria
Matziolis, Georg
Strube, Patrick
Rohe, Sebastian
Brodt, Steffen
Mastrocola, Mario
Eijer, Henk
Rödel, Jürgen
Lindemann, Chris
author_facet Böhle, Sabrina
Vogel, Anna-Maria
Matziolis, Georg
Strube, Patrick
Rohe, Sebastian
Brodt, Steffen
Mastrocola, Mario
Eijer, Henk
Rödel, Jürgen
Lindemann, Chris
author_sort Böhle, Sabrina
collection PubMed
description Periprosthetic infections (PPIs) are a serious concern in total knee and hip arthroplasty, and they have an increasing incidence. To prevent PPI, preoperative skin disinfection, as a key element of antisepsis, represents an important part of infection prevention. However, no specific antiseptic agent is endorsed by the relevant guidelines. The purpose of this retrospective, not randomized study was to investigate the difference in the residual bacteria load between an approved antiseptic with an alcohol-based solution with additional benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and an alcohol-based solution with additional octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT) at two different time periods. In 200 consecutive patients with total knee or hip arthroplasty, skin samples from the surgical sites were collected after skin disinfection with BAC (100 g solution contain: propan-2-ol 63.0 g, benzalkonium chloride 0.025 g) or OCT (100 g solution contain: octenidine dihydrochloride 0.1 g, propan-1-ol, 30.0 g, propan-2-ol 45.0 g) (100 patients per group). Following the separation of cutis and subcutis and its processing, culture was performed on different agar plates in aerobic and anaerobic environments. In the case of bacteria detection, the microbial identification was determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and the number of contaminated samples was compared between the groups. Additionally, multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the effect of the type of disinfectant, BMI, age, sex, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, skin disorders, smoking status, and localization of skin samples on positive bacteria detection. A total of 34 samples were positive for bacteria in the BAC group, while only 17 samples were positive in the OCT group (p = 0.005). Disinfectant type was the only significant parameter in the multiple regression analysis (p = 0.006). A significantly higher contamination rate of the subcutis was shown in the BAC group compared to the OCT group (19 vs. 9, p = 0,003). After the change from BAC to OCT in preoperative skin cleansing in the hip and knee areas, the number of positive cultures decreased by 50%, which might have been caused by a higher microbicidal activity of OCT. Therefore, the use of OCT in preoperative cleansing may reduce the risk of PPI in hip and knee surgery. Randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the effect and to evaluate if it reduces the risk of PPI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9617848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96178482022-10-31 Comparison of two different antiseptics regarding intracutaneous microbial load after preoperative skin cleansing in total knee and hip arthroplasties Böhle, Sabrina Vogel, Anna-Maria Matziolis, Georg Strube, Patrick Rohe, Sebastian Brodt, Steffen Mastrocola, Mario Eijer, Henk Rödel, Jürgen Lindemann, Chris Sci Rep Article Periprosthetic infections (PPIs) are a serious concern in total knee and hip arthroplasty, and they have an increasing incidence. To prevent PPI, preoperative skin disinfection, as a key element of antisepsis, represents an important part of infection prevention. However, no specific antiseptic agent is endorsed by the relevant guidelines. The purpose of this retrospective, not randomized study was to investigate the difference in the residual bacteria load between an approved antiseptic with an alcohol-based solution with additional benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and an alcohol-based solution with additional octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT) at two different time periods. In 200 consecutive patients with total knee or hip arthroplasty, skin samples from the surgical sites were collected after skin disinfection with BAC (100 g solution contain: propan-2-ol 63.0 g, benzalkonium chloride 0.025 g) or OCT (100 g solution contain: octenidine dihydrochloride 0.1 g, propan-1-ol, 30.0 g, propan-2-ol 45.0 g) (100 patients per group). Following the separation of cutis and subcutis and its processing, culture was performed on different agar plates in aerobic and anaerobic environments. In the case of bacteria detection, the microbial identification was determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and the number of contaminated samples was compared between the groups. Additionally, multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the effect of the type of disinfectant, BMI, age, sex, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, skin disorders, smoking status, and localization of skin samples on positive bacteria detection. A total of 34 samples were positive for bacteria in the BAC group, while only 17 samples were positive in the OCT group (p = 0.005). Disinfectant type was the only significant parameter in the multiple regression analysis (p = 0.006). A significantly higher contamination rate of the subcutis was shown in the BAC group compared to the OCT group (19 vs. 9, p = 0,003). After the change from BAC to OCT in preoperative skin cleansing in the hip and knee areas, the number of positive cultures decreased by 50%, which might have been caused by a higher microbicidal activity of OCT. Therefore, the use of OCT in preoperative cleansing may reduce the risk of PPI in hip and knee surgery. Randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the effect and to evaluate if it reduces the risk of PPI. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9617848/ /pubmed/36309598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23070-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Böhle, Sabrina
Vogel, Anna-Maria
Matziolis, Georg
Strube, Patrick
Rohe, Sebastian
Brodt, Steffen
Mastrocola, Mario
Eijer, Henk
Rödel, Jürgen
Lindemann, Chris
Comparison of two different antiseptics regarding intracutaneous microbial load after preoperative skin cleansing in total knee and hip arthroplasties
title Comparison of two different antiseptics regarding intracutaneous microbial load after preoperative skin cleansing in total knee and hip arthroplasties
title_full Comparison of two different antiseptics regarding intracutaneous microbial load after preoperative skin cleansing in total knee and hip arthroplasties
title_fullStr Comparison of two different antiseptics regarding intracutaneous microbial load after preoperative skin cleansing in total knee and hip arthroplasties
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two different antiseptics regarding intracutaneous microbial load after preoperative skin cleansing in total knee and hip arthroplasties
title_short Comparison of two different antiseptics regarding intracutaneous microbial load after preoperative skin cleansing in total knee and hip arthroplasties
title_sort comparison of two different antiseptics regarding intracutaneous microbial load after preoperative skin cleansing in total knee and hip arthroplasties
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23070-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bohlesabrina comparisonoftwodifferentantisepticsregardingintracutaneousmicrobialloadafterpreoperativeskincleansingintotalkneeandhiparthroplasties
AT vogelannamaria comparisonoftwodifferentantisepticsregardingintracutaneousmicrobialloadafterpreoperativeskincleansingintotalkneeandhiparthroplasties
AT matziolisgeorg comparisonoftwodifferentantisepticsregardingintracutaneousmicrobialloadafterpreoperativeskincleansingintotalkneeandhiparthroplasties
AT strubepatrick comparisonoftwodifferentantisepticsregardingintracutaneousmicrobialloadafterpreoperativeskincleansingintotalkneeandhiparthroplasties
AT rohesebastian comparisonoftwodifferentantisepticsregardingintracutaneousmicrobialloadafterpreoperativeskincleansingintotalkneeandhiparthroplasties
AT brodtsteffen comparisonoftwodifferentantisepticsregardingintracutaneousmicrobialloadafterpreoperativeskincleansingintotalkneeandhiparthroplasties
AT mastrocolamario comparisonoftwodifferentantisepticsregardingintracutaneousmicrobialloadafterpreoperativeskincleansingintotalkneeandhiparthroplasties
AT eijerhenk comparisonoftwodifferentantisepticsregardingintracutaneousmicrobialloadafterpreoperativeskincleansingintotalkneeandhiparthroplasties
AT rodeljurgen comparisonoftwodifferentantisepticsregardingintracutaneousmicrobialloadafterpreoperativeskincleansingintotalkneeandhiparthroplasties
AT lindemannchris comparisonoftwodifferentantisepticsregardingintracutaneousmicrobialloadafterpreoperativeskincleansingintotalkneeandhiparthroplasties