Cargando…

Comparative analysis of the immune response to RFA and cryoablation in a colon cancer mouse model

The immune response to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CRA) was characterized and compared in a colon cancer mouse model. All studies were conducted under a research protocol approved by the National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Animal Care and Use Committee. BALB/cJ mice w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mauda-Havakuk, Michal, Hawken, Natalie M., Owen, Joshua W., Mikhail, Andrew S., Saxena, Ankit, Karim, Baktiar, Wakim, Paul G., Pritchard, William F., Karanian, John W., Wood, Bradford J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22279-w
_version_ 1784820945218699264
author Mauda-Havakuk, Michal
Hawken, Natalie M.
Owen, Joshua W.
Mikhail, Andrew S.
Saxena, Ankit
Karim, Baktiar
Wakim, Paul G.
Pritchard, William F.
Karanian, John W.
Wood, Bradford J.
author_facet Mauda-Havakuk, Michal
Hawken, Natalie M.
Owen, Joshua W.
Mikhail, Andrew S.
Saxena, Ankit
Karim, Baktiar
Wakim, Paul G.
Pritchard, William F.
Karanian, John W.
Wood, Bradford J.
author_sort Mauda-Havakuk, Michal
collection PubMed
description The immune response to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CRA) was characterized and compared in a colon cancer mouse model. All studies were conducted under a research protocol approved by the National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Animal Care and Use Committee. BALB/cJ mice were inoculated with CT26 cells, and randomized to RFA, CRA, or sham treatment. Mice were sacrificed 3 days post-treatment, and tumor, spleen, and serum were harvested. Cell death was determined by Caspase-3 immunohistochemical and TUNEL stains. Immune response was analyzed using flow cytometry, serum cytokine assay and immunohistochemistry. Cell death, necrosis, and apoptosis induced by ablation were comparable in RFA and CRA. Decreased frequency of systemic T-regulatory cells was found in the CRA group. Both RFA and CRA reduced frequencies of several myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) subpopulations. RFA induced pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion including TNF-α and IL-12 as well as anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-5, and IL-10. CRA augmented secretion of a wider array of cytokines compared to RFA with both pro- and anti-inflammatory properties including IL-1β, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and KC GRO. In the tumor microenvironment, RFA reduced the number of T-regulatory cells, a finding not observed with CRA. Reduction of immune suppression via decreases in T-regulatory cells and MDSC was found to be induced by RFA or CRA. CRA augmented a wider range of cytokines than RFA, which were mainly pro-inflammatory, but also anti-inflammatory. In the tumor microenvironment, RFA demonstrated more pronounced anti-tumoral immunity. Further delineation of specific immunomodulation induced by ablation could inform drug-device development and may play a role in future hypothesis-driven immunomodulatory paradigms that combine immunotherapy drugs with tumor destruction for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9617942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96179422022-10-31 Comparative analysis of the immune response to RFA and cryoablation in a colon cancer mouse model Mauda-Havakuk, Michal Hawken, Natalie M. Owen, Joshua W. Mikhail, Andrew S. Saxena, Ankit Karim, Baktiar Wakim, Paul G. Pritchard, William F. Karanian, John W. Wood, Bradford J. Sci Rep Article The immune response to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CRA) was characterized and compared in a colon cancer mouse model. All studies were conducted under a research protocol approved by the National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, Animal Care and Use Committee. BALB/cJ mice were inoculated with CT26 cells, and randomized to RFA, CRA, or sham treatment. Mice were sacrificed 3 days post-treatment, and tumor, spleen, and serum were harvested. Cell death was determined by Caspase-3 immunohistochemical and TUNEL stains. Immune response was analyzed using flow cytometry, serum cytokine assay and immunohistochemistry. Cell death, necrosis, and apoptosis induced by ablation were comparable in RFA and CRA. Decreased frequency of systemic T-regulatory cells was found in the CRA group. Both RFA and CRA reduced frequencies of several myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) subpopulations. RFA induced pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion including TNF-α and IL-12 as well as anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-5, and IL-10. CRA augmented secretion of a wider array of cytokines compared to RFA with both pro- and anti-inflammatory properties including IL-1β, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, and KC GRO. In the tumor microenvironment, RFA reduced the number of T-regulatory cells, a finding not observed with CRA. Reduction of immune suppression via decreases in T-regulatory cells and MDSC was found to be induced by RFA or CRA. CRA augmented a wider range of cytokines than RFA, which were mainly pro-inflammatory, but also anti-inflammatory. In the tumor microenvironment, RFA demonstrated more pronounced anti-tumoral immunity. Further delineation of specific immunomodulation induced by ablation could inform drug-device development and may play a role in future hypothesis-driven immunomodulatory paradigms that combine immunotherapy drugs with tumor destruction for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9617942/ /pubmed/36309550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22279-w Text en © This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Mauda-Havakuk, Michal
Hawken, Natalie M.
Owen, Joshua W.
Mikhail, Andrew S.
Saxena, Ankit
Karim, Baktiar
Wakim, Paul G.
Pritchard, William F.
Karanian, John W.
Wood, Bradford J.
Comparative analysis of the immune response to RFA and cryoablation in a colon cancer mouse model
title Comparative analysis of the immune response to RFA and cryoablation in a colon cancer mouse model
title_full Comparative analysis of the immune response to RFA and cryoablation in a colon cancer mouse model
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of the immune response to RFA and cryoablation in a colon cancer mouse model
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of the immune response to RFA and cryoablation in a colon cancer mouse model
title_short Comparative analysis of the immune response to RFA and cryoablation in a colon cancer mouse model
title_sort comparative analysis of the immune response to rfa and cryoablation in a colon cancer mouse model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22279-w
work_keys_str_mv AT maudahavakukmichal comparativeanalysisoftheimmuneresponsetorfaandcryoablationinacoloncancermousemodel
AT hawkennataliem comparativeanalysisoftheimmuneresponsetorfaandcryoablationinacoloncancermousemodel
AT owenjoshuaw comparativeanalysisoftheimmuneresponsetorfaandcryoablationinacoloncancermousemodel
AT mikhailandrews comparativeanalysisoftheimmuneresponsetorfaandcryoablationinacoloncancermousemodel
AT saxenaankit comparativeanalysisoftheimmuneresponsetorfaandcryoablationinacoloncancermousemodel
AT karimbaktiar comparativeanalysisoftheimmuneresponsetorfaandcryoablationinacoloncancermousemodel
AT wakimpaulg comparativeanalysisoftheimmuneresponsetorfaandcryoablationinacoloncancermousemodel
AT pritchardwilliamf comparativeanalysisoftheimmuneresponsetorfaandcryoablationinacoloncancermousemodel
AT karanianjohnw comparativeanalysisoftheimmuneresponsetorfaandcryoablationinacoloncancermousemodel
AT woodbradfordj comparativeanalysisoftheimmuneresponsetorfaandcryoablationinacoloncancermousemodel