Cargando…

Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern

PURPOSE: To identify parameters to predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group (GG) 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform and intraductal carcinoma (CR/IDC) on biopsy. METHODS: Preoperative biopsies from 657 men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer were reviewed for GG, pres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	van der Slot, Margaretha A., Seyrek, Neslisah, Kweldam, Charlotte F., den Bakker, Michael A., Busstra, Martijn B., Gan, Melanie, Klaver, Sjoerd, Rietbergen, John B. W., van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9617947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36190529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04161-6

Ejemplares similares

Cribriform architecture outperforms Gleason pattern 4 percentage and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in predicting the outcome of Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients
por: Seyrek, Neslisah, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Inter-observer variability of cribriform architecture and percent Gleason pattern 4 in prostate cancer: relation to clinical outcome
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images
por: Ambrosini, Pierre, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Alternative prostate cancer grading systems incorporating percent pattern 4/5 (IQ-Gleason) and cribriform architecture (cGrade) improve prediction of outcome after radical prostatectomy
por: Seyrek, Neslisah, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

On cribriform prostate cancer
por: Kweldam, Charlotte F., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cribriform architecture in radical prostatectomies predicts oncological outcome in Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Large cribriform growth pattern identifies ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer at high risk for recurrence and metastasis
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

NeuroSAFE in radical prostatectomy increases the rate of nerve‐sparing surgery without affecting oncological outcome
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Large and small cribriform architecture have similar adverse clinical outcome on prostate cancer biopsies
por: Rijstenberg, L Lucia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Concordance of cribriform architecture in matched prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comedonecrosis Gleason pattern 5 is associated with worse clinical outcome in operated prostate cancer patients
por: Hansum, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Intraoperative assessment and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens to guide nerve‐sparing surgery in prostate cancer patients (NeuroSAFE)
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Distinct Adverse Clinical Outcomes of Small and Large Cribriform Patterns on Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer: A Preliminary Study
por: Kazan, Ozgur, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cribriform and intraductal prostate cancer are associated with increased genomic instability and distinct genomic alterations
por: Böttcher, René, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading
por: van Leenders, Geert J L H, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The highest percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 is a predictor in intermediate‐risk prostate cancer
por: Sato, Shun, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Molecular risk classifier score and biochemical recurrence risk are associated with cribriform pattern type in Gleason 3+4=7 prostate cancer
por: Greenland, Nancy Y., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cribriform pattern does not have a significant impact in Gleason Score ≥7/ISUP Grade ≥2 prostate cancers submitted to radical prostatectomy
por: Flammia, Simone, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Updating the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator with Invasive Cribriform and/or Intraductal Carcinoma for Men with a Prior Negative Biopsy
por: Remmers, Sebastiaan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
por: Taguchi, Satoru, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cribriform Patterned Lesions in the Prostate Gland with Emphasis on Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Significance
por: Destouni, Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Oncologic Outcomes of Patients With Gleason Score 7 and Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 After Radical Prostatectomy
por: Leng, Yi-Hsueh, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cribriform ulcerations of the back
por: Aivaz, Marudeen, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Gene-expression analysis of gleason grade 3 tumor glands embedded in low- and high-risk prostate cancer
por: Hoogland, A. Marije, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Diffusion Restriction Comparison between Gleason 4 Fused Glands and Cribriform Glands within Patient Using Whole-Mount Prostate Pathology as Ground Truth
por: Duenweg, Savannah R., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Primary Cutaneous Cribriform Apocrine Carcinoma
por: Boettler, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Prognostic Histopathological and Molecular Markers on Prostate Cancer Needle-Biopsies: A Review
por: Hoogland, A. Marije, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Clinical significance of subtypes of Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer
por: Hassan, Oudai, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Progressive cribriform and zosteriform hyperpigmentation
por: Gutte, Rameshwar M.
Publicado: (2014)

Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in patients with Gleason score 7 after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study
por: Li, Jiakun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cribriform pattern in prostate tissues: Predictor for intraductal carcinoma of the prostate based on biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology
por: Shiomi, Ei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies
por: Lucas, Marit, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cribriform-morular variant of thyroid carcinoma
por: Cameselle-Teijeiro, J.M., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Grading of prostate cancer: a work in progress
por: Kweldam, C F, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Optimized b-value selection for the discrimination of prostate cancer grades, including the cribriform pattern, using diffusion weighted imaging
por: Hurrell, Sarah L., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A miscellany of cribriform pattern, squamous metaplasia and clear cells in pleomorphic adenoma of upper lip: A diagnostic paradox
por: Shome, Sayani, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cribriform pattern disease over‐represented in pelvic lymph node metastases identified on (68)GA PSMA‐PET/CT
por: Bolton, Damien, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Percent Gleason pattern 4 in stratifying the prognosis of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer
por: Sharma, Meenal, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Combining weakly and strongly supervised learning improves strong supervision in Gleason pattern classification
por: Otálora, Sebastian, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_g5rrmbpek8qpbk0mbcb33sv6tt