Cargando…
Dating the Paleolithic: Trapped charge methods and amino acid geochronology
Despite the vast array of different geochronological tools available, dating the Paleolithic remains one of the discipline’s greatest challenges. This review focuses on two different dating approaches: trapped charge and amino acid geochronology. While differing in their fundamental principles, both...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36252044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109324119 |
_version_ | 1784820977383768064 |
---|---|
author | Penkman, Kirsty E. H. Duller, Geoff A. T. Roberts, Helen M. Colarossi, Debra Dickinson, Marc R. White, Dustin |
author_facet | Penkman, Kirsty E. H. Duller, Geoff A. T. Roberts, Helen M. Colarossi, Debra Dickinson, Marc R. White, Dustin |
author_sort | Penkman, Kirsty E. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the vast array of different geochronological tools available, dating the Paleolithic remains one of the discipline’s greatest challenges. This review focuses on two different dating approaches: trapped charge and amino acid geochronology. While differing in their fundamental principles, both exploit time-dependent changes in signals found within crystals to generate a chronology for the material dated and hence, the associated deposits. Within each method, there is a diverse range of signals that can be analyzed, each covering different time ranges, applicable to different materials and suitable for different paleoenvironmental and archaeological contexts. This multiplicity of signals can at first sight appear confusing, but it is a fundamental strength of the techniques, allowing internal checks for consistency and providing more information than simply a chronology. For each technique, we present an overview of the basis for the time-dependent signals and the types of material that can be analyzed, with examples of their archaeological application, as well as their future potential. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9618083 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96180832022-10-31 Dating the Paleolithic: Trapped charge methods and amino acid geochronology Penkman, Kirsty E. H. Duller, Geoff A. T. Roberts, Helen M. Colarossi, Debra Dickinson, Marc R. White, Dustin Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Perspective Despite the vast array of different geochronological tools available, dating the Paleolithic remains one of the discipline’s greatest challenges. This review focuses on two different dating approaches: trapped charge and amino acid geochronology. While differing in their fundamental principles, both exploit time-dependent changes in signals found within crystals to generate a chronology for the material dated and hence, the associated deposits. Within each method, there is a diverse range of signals that can be analyzed, each covering different time ranges, applicable to different materials and suitable for different paleoenvironmental and archaeological contexts. This multiplicity of signals can at first sight appear confusing, but it is a fundamental strength of the techniques, allowing internal checks for consistency and providing more information than simply a chronology. For each technique, we present an overview of the basis for the time-dependent signals and the types of material that can be analyzed, with examples of their archaeological application, as well as their future potential. National Academy of Sciences 2022-10-17 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9618083/ /pubmed/36252044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109324119 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Perspective Penkman, Kirsty E. H. Duller, Geoff A. T. Roberts, Helen M. Colarossi, Debra Dickinson, Marc R. White, Dustin Dating the Paleolithic: Trapped charge methods and amino acid geochronology |
title | Dating the Paleolithic: Trapped charge methods and amino acid geochronology |
title_full | Dating the Paleolithic: Trapped charge methods and amino acid geochronology |
title_fullStr | Dating the Paleolithic: Trapped charge methods and amino acid geochronology |
title_full_unstemmed | Dating the Paleolithic: Trapped charge methods and amino acid geochronology |
title_short | Dating the Paleolithic: Trapped charge methods and amino acid geochronology |
title_sort | dating the paleolithic: trapped charge methods and amino acid geochronology |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36252044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109324119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penkmankirstyeh datingthepaleolithictrappedchargemethodsandaminoacidgeochronology AT dullergeoffat datingthepaleolithictrappedchargemethodsandaminoacidgeochronology AT robertshelenm datingthepaleolithictrappedchargemethodsandaminoacidgeochronology AT colarossidebra datingthepaleolithictrappedchargemethodsandaminoacidgeochronology AT dickinsonmarcr datingthepaleolithictrappedchargemethodsandaminoacidgeochronology AT whitedustin datingthepaleolithictrappedchargemethodsandaminoacidgeochronology |