Cargando…

Prognostic value of coronary microvascular dysfunction assessed by coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in diabetic patients with chronic coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is common and is associated with unfavorable cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR) is a recently developed wire- and hyperemic agent-free method to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Wen, Singh, Shekhar, Liu, Lu, Mohammed, Abdul-Quddus, Yin, Guoqing, Xu, Siling, Lv, Xian, Shi, Tingting, Feng, Cailin, Jiang, Rong, Mohammed, Ayman A., Mareai, Redhwan M., Xu, Yawei, Yu, Xuejing, Abdu, Fuad A., Che, Wenliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36309724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-022-01653-y
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is common and is associated with unfavorable cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR) is a recently developed wire- and hyperemic agent-free method to assess CMD. We aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of CMD assessed by caIMR on clinical outcomes in patients with DM and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). METHODS: CCS patients who underwent coronary angiography between June 2015 to May 2018 were included. Coronary microvascular function was measured by caIMR, and CMD was defined as caIMR ≥ 25U. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relationship between caIMR and the risk of MACE. RESULTS: Of 290 CCS patients, 102 patients had DM. Compared with non-diabetic patients, CMD (caIMR ≥ 25U) was higher among DM patients (57.8% vs. 38.3%; p = 0.001). During a mean 35 months follow-up, 40 MACE had occurred. Patients with caIMR ≥ 25 had a higher rate of MACE than patients with caIMR < 25 (20.6% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.002). Of these, the MACE rate was higher among DM patients with caIMR ≥ 25 than those with caIMR < 25 (33.9% vs. 14.0%; p = 0.022). In multivariable Cox analysis, caIMR ≥ 25 was independently associated with MACE in the DM patients but not in non-DM patients (HR, 2.760; 95% CI, 1.066–7.146; P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: CMD assessed by caIMR was common and is an independent predictor of MACE among diabetic patients with CCS. This finding potentially enables a triage of higher-risk patients to more intensive therapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12933-022-01653-y.