Evaluation of medication-related problems in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist: a cohort study

BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients undergo significant changes in their medication regimen during follow-up and are at an increased risk for medication-related problems (MRPs). AIM: This study aimed to compare the prevalence and types of MRPs and interventions in liver transplant recipients with and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulder, Midas B., Doga, B., Borgsteede, S. D., van den Burg, A. M., Metselaar, H. J., den Hoed, C. M., Hunfeld, N. G.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36100818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01423-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients undergo significant changes in their medication regimen during follow-up and are at an increased risk for medication-related problems (MRPs). AIM: This study aimed to compare the prevalence and types of MRPs and interventions in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist as well as the satisfaction with information about medicines and medication adherence. METHOD: We performed a single-center, observational cohort study. A retro- and prospective cohort were used and subdivided in a group that did and did not receive a medication consultation. The prevalence and types of MRPs and interventions were identified and categorized. The satisfaction parameters were evaluated using validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Included were 291 patients. In total, 368 MRPs were identified in 197 patients in the non-medication consultation cohort (median 1; range 1–3 per patient) and 248 MRPs in 94 patients in the medication consultation cohort (median 2; range 1–4 per patient). In the medication consultation cohort, significantly fewer MRPs as unnecessary drugs (17.3% versus 58.7%, p < 0.001), suboptimal therapy (2.4% versus 9.5%, p < 0.001), untreated indication (2.8% versus 6.8%, p = 0.040) and underdosed drugs (0.4% versus 6.3%, p < 0.001) were identified. In the non-medication consultation cohort significantly more patients used unnecessary drugs (72.1% versus 39.4%, p < 0.001) compared to the medication consultation cohort. Patients in both cohorts are satisfied with the information about medicines and reported a high medication adherence. CONCLUSION: Patients in the medication consultation cohort had significantly fewer MRPs and used significantly less unnecessary drugs. Including a clinical pharmacist to the post-transplant care has an added value. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01423-6.

Ejemplares similares