Cargando…

Evaluation of medication-related problems in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist: a cohort study

BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients undergo significant changes in their medication regimen during follow-up and are at an increased risk for medication-related problems (MRPs). AIM: This study aimed to compare the prevalence and types of MRPs and interventions in liver transplant recipients with and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulder, Midas B., Doga, B., Borgsteede, S. D., van den Burg, A. M., Metselaar, H. J., den Hoed, C. M., Hunfeld, N. G.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36100818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01423-6
_version_ 1784821063186644992
author Mulder, Midas B.
Doga, B.
Borgsteede, S. D.
van den Burg, A. M.
Metselaar, H. J.
den Hoed, C. M.
Hunfeld, N. G.M.
author_facet Mulder, Midas B.
Doga, B.
Borgsteede, S. D.
van den Burg, A. M.
Metselaar, H. J.
den Hoed, C. M.
Hunfeld, N. G.M.
author_sort Mulder, Midas B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients undergo significant changes in their medication regimen during follow-up and are at an increased risk for medication-related problems (MRPs). AIM: This study aimed to compare the prevalence and types of MRPs and interventions in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist as well as the satisfaction with information about medicines and medication adherence. METHOD: We performed a single-center, observational cohort study. A retro- and prospective cohort were used and subdivided in a group that did and did not receive a medication consultation. The prevalence and types of MRPs and interventions were identified and categorized. The satisfaction parameters were evaluated using validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Included were 291 patients. In total, 368 MRPs were identified in 197 patients in the non-medication consultation cohort (median 1; range 1–3 per patient) and 248 MRPs in 94 patients in the medication consultation cohort (median 2; range 1–4 per patient). In the medication consultation cohort, significantly fewer MRPs as unnecessary drugs (17.3% versus 58.7%, p < 0.001), suboptimal therapy (2.4% versus 9.5%, p < 0.001), untreated indication (2.8% versus 6.8%, p = 0.040) and underdosed drugs (0.4% versus 6.3%, p < 0.001) were identified. In the non-medication consultation cohort significantly more patients used unnecessary drugs (72.1% versus 39.4%, p < 0.001) compared to the medication consultation cohort. Patients in both cohorts are satisfied with the information about medicines and reported a high medication adherence. CONCLUSION: Patients in the medication consultation cohort had significantly fewer MRPs and used significantly less unnecessary drugs. Including a clinical pharmacist to the post-transplant care has an added value. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01423-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9618499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96184992022-11-01 Evaluation of medication-related problems in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist: a cohort study Mulder, Midas B. Doga, B. Borgsteede, S. D. van den Burg, A. M. Metselaar, H. J. den Hoed, C. M. Hunfeld, N. G.M. Int J Clin Pharm Research Article BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients undergo significant changes in their medication regimen during follow-up and are at an increased risk for medication-related problems (MRPs). AIM: This study aimed to compare the prevalence and types of MRPs and interventions in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist as well as the satisfaction with information about medicines and medication adherence. METHOD: We performed a single-center, observational cohort study. A retro- and prospective cohort were used and subdivided in a group that did and did not receive a medication consultation. The prevalence and types of MRPs and interventions were identified and categorized. The satisfaction parameters were evaluated using validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Included were 291 patients. In total, 368 MRPs were identified in 197 patients in the non-medication consultation cohort (median 1; range 1–3 per patient) and 248 MRPs in 94 patients in the medication consultation cohort (median 2; range 1–4 per patient). In the medication consultation cohort, significantly fewer MRPs as unnecessary drugs (17.3% versus 58.7%, p < 0.001), suboptimal therapy (2.4% versus 9.5%, p < 0.001), untreated indication (2.8% versus 6.8%, p = 0.040) and underdosed drugs (0.4% versus 6.3%, p < 0.001) were identified. In the non-medication consultation cohort significantly more patients used unnecessary drugs (72.1% versus 39.4%, p < 0.001) compared to the medication consultation cohort. Patients in both cohorts are satisfied with the information about medicines and reported a high medication adherence. CONCLUSION: Patients in the medication consultation cohort had significantly fewer MRPs and used significantly less unnecessary drugs. Including a clinical pharmacist to the post-transplant care has an added value. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01423-6. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9618499/ /pubmed/36100818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01423-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Mulder, Midas B.
Doga, B.
Borgsteede, S. D.
van den Burg, A. M.
Metselaar, H. J.
den Hoed, C. M.
Hunfeld, N. G.M.
Evaluation of medication-related problems in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist: a cohort study
title Evaluation of medication-related problems in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist: a cohort study
title_full Evaluation of medication-related problems in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist: a cohort study
title_fullStr Evaluation of medication-related problems in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of medication-related problems in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist: a cohort study
title_short Evaluation of medication-related problems in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist: a cohort study
title_sort evaluation of medication-related problems in liver transplant recipients with and without an outpatient medication consultation by a clinical pharmacist: a cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36100818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01423-6
work_keys_str_mv AT muldermidasb evaluationofmedicationrelatedproblemsinlivertransplantrecipientswithandwithoutanoutpatientmedicationconsultationbyaclinicalpharmacistacohortstudy
AT dogab evaluationofmedicationrelatedproblemsinlivertransplantrecipientswithandwithoutanoutpatientmedicationconsultationbyaclinicalpharmacistacohortstudy
AT borgsteedesd evaluationofmedicationrelatedproblemsinlivertransplantrecipientswithandwithoutanoutpatientmedicationconsultationbyaclinicalpharmacistacohortstudy
AT vandenburgam evaluationofmedicationrelatedproblemsinlivertransplantrecipientswithandwithoutanoutpatientmedicationconsultationbyaclinicalpharmacistacohortstudy
AT metselaarhj evaluationofmedicationrelatedproblemsinlivertransplantrecipientswithandwithoutanoutpatientmedicationconsultationbyaclinicalpharmacistacohortstudy
AT denhoedcm evaluationofmedicationrelatedproblemsinlivertransplantrecipientswithandwithoutanoutpatientmedicationconsultationbyaclinicalpharmacistacohortstudy
AT hunfeldngm evaluationofmedicationrelatedproblemsinlivertransplantrecipientswithandwithoutanoutpatientmedicationconsultationbyaclinicalpharmacistacohortstudy