Cargando…

Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review

Hemispatial neglect is one of the most frequent attention disorders after stroke. The presence of neglect is associated with longer hospital stays, extended rehabilitation periods, and poorer functional recovery. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a new technique with promising result...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: González-Rodriguez, B., Serradell-Ribé, N., Viejo-Sobera, R., Romero-Muñoz, J. P., Marron, Elena M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11338-x
_version_ 1784821067366268928
author González-Rodriguez, B.
Serradell-Ribé, N.
Viejo-Sobera, R.
Romero-Muñoz, J. P.
Marron, Elena M.
author_facet González-Rodriguez, B.
Serradell-Ribé, N.
Viejo-Sobera, R.
Romero-Muñoz, J. P.
Marron, Elena M.
author_sort González-Rodriguez, B.
collection PubMed
description Hemispatial neglect is one of the most frequent attention disorders after stroke. The presence of neglect is associated with longer hospital stays, extended rehabilitation periods, and poorer functional recovery. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a new technique with promising results in neglect rehabilitation; therefore, the objective of this systematic review, performed following the PRISMA guidelines, is to evaluate the effectiveness of tDCS on neglect recovery after stroke. The search was done in MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and BioMed Central databases. A total of 311 articles were found; only 11 met the inclusion criteria, including 152 post-stroke patients in total. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed for all the studies, and methodological characteristics of the studies, sample sizes, methods, main results, and other relevant data were extracted. tDCS intervention ranged from one to twenty sessions distributed in 1 day to 4 weeks, with intensity ranged from 1 to 2 mA. We found moderate evidence for the efficacy of tDCS in the rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect after a stroke, being more effective in combination with other interventions. Nonetheless, the limited number of studies and some studies' design characteristics makes it risky to draw categorical conclusions. Since scientific evidence is still scarce, further research is needed to determine the advantage of this treatment in acute, sub-acute and chronic stroke patients. Future studies should include larger samples, longer follow-ups, and broader neurophysiological assessments, with the final aim of establishing the appropriate use of tDCS as an adjuvant intervention in neurorehabilitation settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11338-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9618519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96185192022-11-01 Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review González-Rodriguez, B. Serradell-Ribé, N. Viejo-Sobera, R. Romero-Muñoz, J. P. Marron, Elena M. J Neurol Review Hemispatial neglect is one of the most frequent attention disorders after stroke. The presence of neglect is associated with longer hospital stays, extended rehabilitation periods, and poorer functional recovery. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a new technique with promising results in neglect rehabilitation; therefore, the objective of this systematic review, performed following the PRISMA guidelines, is to evaluate the effectiveness of tDCS on neglect recovery after stroke. The search was done in MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and BioMed Central databases. A total of 311 articles were found; only 11 met the inclusion criteria, including 152 post-stroke patients in total. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed for all the studies, and methodological characteristics of the studies, sample sizes, methods, main results, and other relevant data were extracted. tDCS intervention ranged from one to twenty sessions distributed in 1 day to 4 weeks, with intensity ranged from 1 to 2 mA. We found moderate evidence for the efficacy of tDCS in the rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect after a stroke, being more effective in combination with other interventions. Nonetheless, the limited number of studies and some studies' design characteristics makes it risky to draw categorical conclusions. Since scientific evidence is still scarce, further research is needed to determine the advantage of this treatment in acute, sub-acute and chronic stroke patients. Future studies should include larger samples, longer follow-ups, and broader neurophysiological assessments, with the final aim of establishing the appropriate use of tDCS as an adjuvant intervention in neurorehabilitation settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11338-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-22 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9618519/ /pubmed/36138161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11338-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
González-Rodriguez, B.
Serradell-Ribé, N.
Viejo-Sobera, R.
Romero-Muñoz, J. P.
Marron, Elena M.
Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
title Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
title_full Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
title_fullStr Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
title_short Transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
title_sort transcranial direct current stimulation in neglect rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36138161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11338-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezrodriguezb transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationinneglectrehabilitationafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT serradellriben transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationinneglectrehabilitationafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT viejosoberar transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationinneglectrehabilitationafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT romeromunozjp transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationinneglectrehabilitationafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT marronelenam transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationinneglectrehabilitationafterstrokeasystematicreview