Cargando…

An analysis of the essential medicines policy in primary care: Findings from MedMinas project

Background: Essential Medicines Policy (EMP) has been adopted in Brazil to improve the provision and use of pharmaceuticals. This mixed methods study aims to bring evidence of the EMP implemented in municipalities in the context of primary care in Minas Gerais (20,997,560 inhabitants), Southeast Bra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luz, Tatiana Chama Borges, Tavares, Noemia Urruth Leão, Marques, Isabela Cristina, de Castro, Ana Karine Sarvel, Cota, Betania Barros
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324686
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.953329
_version_ 1784821095895924736
author Luz, Tatiana Chama Borges
Tavares, Noemia Urruth Leão
Marques, Isabela Cristina
de Castro, Ana Karine Sarvel
Cota, Betania Barros
author_facet Luz, Tatiana Chama Borges
Tavares, Noemia Urruth Leão
Marques, Isabela Cristina
de Castro, Ana Karine Sarvel
Cota, Betania Barros
author_sort Luz, Tatiana Chama Borges
collection PubMed
description Background: Essential Medicines Policy (EMP) has been adopted in Brazil to improve the provision and use of pharmaceuticals. This mixed methods study aims to bring evidence of the EMP implemented in municipalities in the context of primary care in Minas Gerais (20,997,560 inhabitants), Southeast Brazil. Methods: We analysed the core output of the EMP, i.e., the municipal essential medicines lists (MEML) and the effects of the policy on the procurement and availability of medicines. Data sources included a sample of 1,019 individuals (patients, health managers and health professionals), 995 prescriptions, 2,365 dispensed medicines and policy documents from 26 municipalities. Data were collected between April and October 2019. Document analysis and thematic content analysis were performed, and four availability indexes were estimated. Results: The findings suggest an overall lack of standardised and methodologically sound procedures to elaborate the MEML. Funding and public purchasing processes were found to be the major obstacles to medicine procurement. Only 63% of medicines were available at public community pharmacies and just 46.2% of patients had full access to their pharmaceutical treatment. Conclusion: This study reveals weaknesses in the implementation of EMP and a clear disconnection between medicines selection, procurement, and availability, the three core elements of the supply system. These findings contribute to informing future policy improvement actions to strengthen this system. Other countries aiming to advance towards universal health coverage may learn from the challenges that primary care in Brazil still needs to address.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9618643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96186432022-11-01 An analysis of the essential medicines policy in primary care: Findings from MedMinas project Luz, Tatiana Chama Borges Tavares, Noemia Urruth Leão Marques, Isabela Cristina de Castro, Ana Karine Sarvel Cota, Betania Barros Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Essential Medicines Policy (EMP) has been adopted in Brazil to improve the provision and use of pharmaceuticals. This mixed methods study aims to bring evidence of the EMP implemented in municipalities in the context of primary care in Minas Gerais (20,997,560 inhabitants), Southeast Brazil. Methods: We analysed the core output of the EMP, i.e., the municipal essential medicines lists (MEML) and the effects of the policy on the procurement and availability of medicines. Data sources included a sample of 1,019 individuals (patients, health managers and health professionals), 995 prescriptions, 2,365 dispensed medicines and policy documents from 26 municipalities. Data were collected between April and October 2019. Document analysis and thematic content analysis were performed, and four availability indexes were estimated. Results: The findings suggest an overall lack of standardised and methodologically sound procedures to elaborate the MEML. Funding and public purchasing processes were found to be the major obstacles to medicine procurement. Only 63% of medicines were available at public community pharmacies and just 46.2% of patients had full access to their pharmaceutical treatment. Conclusion: This study reveals weaknesses in the implementation of EMP and a clear disconnection between medicines selection, procurement, and availability, the three core elements of the supply system. These findings contribute to informing future policy improvement actions to strengthen this system. Other countries aiming to advance towards universal health coverage may learn from the challenges that primary care in Brazil still needs to address. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9618643/ /pubmed/36324686 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.953329 Text en Copyright © 2022 Luz, Tavares, Marques, de Castro and Cota. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Luz, Tatiana Chama Borges
Tavares, Noemia Urruth Leão
Marques, Isabela Cristina
de Castro, Ana Karine Sarvel
Cota, Betania Barros
An analysis of the essential medicines policy in primary care: Findings from MedMinas project
title An analysis of the essential medicines policy in primary care: Findings from MedMinas project
title_full An analysis of the essential medicines policy in primary care: Findings from MedMinas project
title_fullStr An analysis of the essential medicines policy in primary care: Findings from MedMinas project
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of the essential medicines policy in primary care: Findings from MedMinas project
title_short An analysis of the essential medicines policy in primary care: Findings from MedMinas project
title_sort analysis of the essential medicines policy in primary care: findings from medminas project
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324686
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.953329
work_keys_str_mv AT luztatianachamaborges ananalysisoftheessentialmedicinespolicyinprimarycarefindingsfrommedminasproject
AT tavaresnoemiaurruthleao ananalysisoftheessentialmedicinespolicyinprimarycarefindingsfrommedminasproject
AT marquesisabelacristina ananalysisoftheessentialmedicinespolicyinprimarycarefindingsfrommedminasproject
AT decastroanakarinesarvel ananalysisoftheessentialmedicinespolicyinprimarycarefindingsfrommedminasproject
AT cotabetaniabarros ananalysisoftheessentialmedicinespolicyinprimarycarefindingsfrommedminasproject
AT luztatianachamaborges analysisoftheessentialmedicinespolicyinprimarycarefindingsfrommedminasproject
AT tavaresnoemiaurruthleao analysisoftheessentialmedicinespolicyinprimarycarefindingsfrommedminasproject
AT marquesisabelacristina analysisoftheessentialmedicinespolicyinprimarycarefindingsfrommedminasproject
AT decastroanakarinesarvel analysisoftheessentialmedicinespolicyinprimarycarefindingsfrommedminasproject
AT cotabetaniabarros analysisoftheessentialmedicinespolicyinprimarycarefindingsfrommedminasproject