Cargando…
Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for resectable mucosal melanoma
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibition (CPI) has recently demonstrated impressive outcomes in patients with stage 3 cutaneous melanoma. However, the safety, efficacy, and outcome of neoadjuvant CPI in patients with mucosal melanoma (MM) are not well studied as MM is a rare melanoma subtype. C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324592 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1001150 |
_version_ | 1784821106567282688 |
---|---|
author | Ho, Joel Mattei, Jane Tetzlaff, Michael Williams, Michelle D. Davies, Michael A. Diab, Adi Oliva, Isabella C. Glitza McQuade, Jennifer Patel, Sapna P. Tawbi, Hussein Wong, Michael K. Fisher, Sarah B. Hanna, Ehab Keung, Emily Z. Ross, Merrick Weiser, Roi Su, Shirley Y. Frumovitz, Michael Meyer, Larissa A. Jazaeri, Amir Pettaway, Curtis A. Guadagnolo, B. Ashleigh Bishop, Andrew J. Mitra, Devarati Farooqi, Ahsan Bassett, Roland Faria, Silvana Nagarajan, Priyadharsini Amaria, Rodabe N. |
author_facet | Ho, Joel Mattei, Jane Tetzlaff, Michael Williams, Michelle D. Davies, Michael A. Diab, Adi Oliva, Isabella C. Glitza McQuade, Jennifer Patel, Sapna P. Tawbi, Hussein Wong, Michael K. Fisher, Sarah B. Hanna, Ehab Keung, Emily Z. Ross, Merrick Weiser, Roi Su, Shirley Y. Frumovitz, Michael Meyer, Larissa A. Jazaeri, Amir Pettaway, Curtis A. Guadagnolo, B. Ashleigh Bishop, Andrew J. Mitra, Devarati Farooqi, Ahsan Bassett, Roland Faria, Silvana Nagarajan, Priyadharsini Amaria, Rodabe N. |
author_sort | Ho, Joel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibition (CPI) has recently demonstrated impressive outcomes in patients with stage 3 cutaneous melanoma. However, the safety, efficacy, and outcome of neoadjuvant CPI in patients with mucosal melanoma (MM) are not well studied as MM is a rare melanoma subtype. CPI such as combination nivolumab and ipilimumab achieves response rates of 37-43% in unresectable or metastatic MM but there is limited data regarding the efficacy of these agents in the preoperative setting. We hypothesize that neoadjuvant CPI is a safe and feasible approach for patients with resectable MM. METHOD: Under an institutionally approved protocol, we identified adult MM patients with resectable disease who received neoadjuvant anti-PD1 +/- anti-CTLA4 between 2015 to 2019 at our institution. Clinical information include age, gender, presence of nodal involvement or satellitosis, functional status, pre-treatment LDH, tumor mutation status, and treatment data was collected. Outcomes include event free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), pathologic response rate (PRR), and grade ≥3 toxicities. RESULTS: We identified 36 patients. Median age was 62; 58% were female. Seventy-eight percent of patients received anti-PD1 + anti-CTLA4. Node positive disease or satellite lesions was present at the time of treatment initiation in 47% of patients. Primary sites of disease were anorectal (53%), urogenital (25%), head and neck (17%), and esophageal (6%). A minority of patients did not undergo surgery due to complete response (n=3, 8%) and disease progression (n=6, 17%), respectively. With a median follow up of 37.9 months, the median EFS was 9.2 months with 3-year EFS rate of 29%. Median OS had not been reached and 3-year OS rate was 55%. ORR was 47% and PRR was 35%. EFS was significantly higher for patients with objective response and for patients with pathologic response. OS was significantly higher for patients with pathologic response. Grade 3 toxicities were reported in 39% of patients. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant CPI for resectable MM is a feasible approach with signs of efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. As there is currently no standard approach for resectable MM, this study supports further investigations using neoadjuvant therapy for these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9618687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96186872022-11-01 Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for resectable mucosal melanoma Ho, Joel Mattei, Jane Tetzlaff, Michael Williams, Michelle D. Davies, Michael A. Diab, Adi Oliva, Isabella C. Glitza McQuade, Jennifer Patel, Sapna P. Tawbi, Hussein Wong, Michael K. Fisher, Sarah B. Hanna, Ehab Keung, Emily Z. Ross, Merrick Weiser, Roi Su, Shirley Y. Frumovitz, Michael Meyer, Larissa A. Jazaeri, Amir Pettaway, Curtis A. Guadagnolo, B. Ashleigh Bishop, Andrew J. Mitra, Devarati Farooqi, Ahsan Bassett, Roland Faria, Silvana Nagarajan, Priyadharsini Amaria, Rodabe N. Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibition (CPI) has recently demonstrated impressive outcomes in patients with stage 3 cutaneous melanoma. However, the safety, efficacy, and outcome of neoadjuvant CPI in patients with mucosal melanoma (MM) are not well studied as MM is a rare melanoma subtype. CPI such as combination nivolumab and ipilimumab achieves response rates of 37-43% in unresectable or metastatic MM but there is limited data regarding the efficacy of these agents in the preoperative setting. We hypothesize that neoadjuvant CPI is a safe and feasible approach for patients with resectable MM. METHOD: Under an institutionally approved protocol, we identified adult MM patients with resectable disease who received neoadjuvant anti-PD1 +/- anti-CTLA4 between 2015 to 2019 at our institution. Clinical information include age, gender, presence of nodal involvement or satellitosis, functional status, pre-treatment LDH, tumor mutation status, and treatment data was collected. Outcomes include event free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), pathologic response rate (PRR), and grade ≥3 toxicities. RESULTS: We identified 36 patients. Median age was 62; 58% were female. Seventy-eight percent of patients received anti-PD1 + anti-CTLA4. Node positive disease or satellite lesions was present at the time of treatment initiation in 47% of patients. Primary sites of disease were anorectal (53%), urogenital (25%), head and neck (17%), and esophageal (6%). A minority of patients did not undergo surgery due to complete response (n=3, 8%) and disease progression (n=6, 17%), respectively. With a median follow up of 37.9 months, the median EFS was 9.2 months with 3-year EFS rate of 29%. Median OS had not been reached and 3-year OS rate was 55%. ORR was 47% and PRR was 35%. EFS was significantly higher for patients with objective response and for patients with pathologic response. OS was significantly higher for patients with pathologic response. Grade 3 toxicities were reported in 39% of patients. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant CPI for resectable MM is a feasible approach with signs of efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. As there is currently no standard approach for resectable MM, this study supports further investigations using neoadjuvant therapy for these patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9618687/ /pubmed/36324592 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1001150 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ho, Mattei, Tetzlaff, Williams, Davies, Diab, Oliva, McQuade, Patel, Tawbi, Wong, Fisher, Hanna, Keung, Ross, Weiser, Su, Frumovitz, Meyer, Jazaeri, Pettaway, Guadagnolo, Bishop, Mitra, Farooqi, Bassett, Faria, Nagarajan and Amaria https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Ho, Joel Mattei, Jane Tetzlaff, Michael Williams, Michelle D. Davies, Michael A. Diab, Adi Oliva, Isabella C. Glitza McQuade, Jennifer Patel, Sapna P. Tawbi, Hussein Wong, Michael K. Fisher, Sarah B. Hanna, Ehab Keung, Emily Z. Ross, Merrick Weiser, Roi Su, Shirley Y. Frumovitz, Michael Meyer, Larissa A. Jazaeri, Amir Pettaway, Curtis A. Guadagnolo, B. Ashleigh Bishop, Andrew J. Mitra, Devarati Farooqi, Ahsan Bassett, Roland Faria, Silvana Nagarajan, Priyadharsini Amaria, Rodabe N. Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for resectable mucosal melanoma |
title | Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for resectable mucosal melanoma |
title_full | Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for resectable mucosal melanoma |
title_fullStr | Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for resectable mucosal melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for resectable mucosal melanoma |
title_short | Neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for resectable mucosal melanoma |
title_sort | neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for resectable mucosal melanoma |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324592 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1001150 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hojoel neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT matteijane neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT tetzlaffmichael neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT williamsmichelled neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT daviesmichaela neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT diabadi neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT olivaisabellacglitza neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT mcquadejennifer neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT patelsapnap neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT tawbihussein neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT wongmichaelk neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT fishersarahb neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT hannaehab neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT keungemilyz neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT rossmerrick neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT weiserroi neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT sushirleyy neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT frumovitzmichael neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT meyerlarissaa neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT jazaeriamir neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT pettawaycurtisa neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT guadagnolobashleigh neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT bishopandrewj neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT mitradevarati neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT farooqiahsan neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT bassettroland neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT fariasilvana neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT nagarajanpriyadharsini neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma AT amariarodaben neoadjuvantcheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyforresectablemucosalmelanoma |