Cargando…
Fall detection using accelerometer-based smartphones: Where do we go from here?
According to World Health Organization statistics, falls are the second leading cause of unintentional injury deaths worldwide. With older people being particularly vulnerable, detecting, and reporting falls have been the focus of numerous health technology studies. We screened 267 studies and selec...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.996021 |
_version_ | 1784821154036318208 |
---|---|
author | Stampfler, Tristan Elgendi, Mohamed Fletcher, Richard Ribon Menon, Carlo |
author_facet | Stampfler, Tristan Elgendi, Mohamed Fletcher, Richard Ribon Menon, Carlo |
author_sort | Stampfler, Tristan |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to World Health Organization statistics, falls are the second leading cause of unintentional injury deaths worldwide. With older people being particularly vulnerable, detecting, and reporting falls have been the focus of numerous health technology studies. We screened 267 studies and selected 15 that detailed pervasive fall detection and alerting apps that used smartphone accelerometers. The fall datasets used for the analyses included between 4 and 38 participants and contained data from young and old subjects, with the recorded falls performed exclusively by young subjects. Threshold-based detection was implemented in six cases, while machine learning approaches were implemented in the other nine, including decision trees, k-nearest neighbors, boosting, and neural networks. All methods could ultimately achieve real-time detection, with reported sensitivities ranging from 60.4 to 99.3% and specificities from 74.6 to 100.0%. However, the studies had limitations in their experimental set-ups or considered a restricted scope of daily activities—not always representative of daily life—with which to define falls during the development of their algorithms. Finally, the studies omitted some aspects of data science methodology, such as proper test sets for results evaluation, putting into question whether reported results would correspond to real-world performance. The two primary outcomes of our review are: a ranking of selected articles based on bias risk and a set of 12 impactful and actionable recommendations for future work in fall detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9618891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96188912022-11-01 Fall detection using accelerometer-based smartphones: Where do we go from here? Stampfler, Tristan Elgendi, Mohamed Fletcher, Richard Ribon Menon, Carlo Front Public Health Public Health According to World Health Organization statistics, falls are the second leading cause of unintentional injury deaths worldwide. With older people being particularly vulnerable, detecting, and reporting falls have been the focus of numerous health technology studies. We screened 267 studies and selected 15 that detailed pervasive fall detection and alerting apps that used smartphone accelerometers. The fall datasets used for the analyses included between 4 and 38 participants and contained data from young and old subjects, with the recorded falls performed exclusively by young subjects. Threshold-based detection was implemented in six cases, while machine learning approaches were implemented in the other nine, including decision trees, k-nearest neighbors, boosting, and neural networks. All methods could ultimately achieve real-time detection, with reported sensitivities ranging from 60.4 to 99.3% and specificities from 74.6 to 100.0%. However, the studies had limitations in their experimental set-ups or considered a restricted scope of daily activities—not always representative of daily life—with which to define falls during the development of their algorithms. Finally, the studies omitted some aspects of data science methodology, such as proper test sets for results evaluation, putting into question whether reported results would correspond to real-world performance. The two primary outcomes of our review are: a ranking of selected articles based on bias risk and a set of 12 impactful and actionable recommendations for future work in fall detection. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9618891/ /pubmed/36324447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.996021 Text en Copyright © 2022 Stampfler, Elgendi, Fletcher and Menon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Stampfler, Tristan Elgendi, Mohamed Fletcher, Richard Ribon Menon, Carlo Fall detection using accelerometer-based smartphones: Where do we go from here? |
title | Fall detection using accelerometer-based smartphones: Where do we go from here? |
title_full | Fall detection using accelerometer-based smartphones: Where do we go from here? |
title_fullStr | Fall detection using accelerometer-based smartphones: Where do we go from here? |
title_full_unstemmed | Fall detection using accelerometer-based smartphones: Where do we go from here? |
title_short | Fall detection using accelerometer-based smartphones: Where do we go from here? |
title_sort | fall detection using accelerometer-based smartphones: where do we go from here? |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36324447 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.996021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stampflertristan falldetectionusingaccelerometerbasedsmartphoneswheredowegofromhere AT elgendimohamed falldetectionusingaccelerometerbasedsmartphoneswheredowegofromhere AT fletcherrichardribon falldetectionusingaccelerometerbasedsmartphoneswheredowegofromhere AT menoncarlo falldetectionusingaccelerometerbasedsmartphoneswheredowegofromhere |