Cargando…
Performance Comparison Between Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy–based IR Biotyper and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Strain Diversity
BACKGROUND: Development of an accessible method to routinely evaluate the clonality of strains is needed in microbiology laboratories. We compared the discriminatory power of the Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy–based IR Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Bremen, Germany) to matrix-assis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36281511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.2.174 |
_version_ | 1784821156936679424 |
---|---|
author | Jun, Son Young Kim, Young Ah Lee, Suk-Jun Jung, Woon-Won Kim, Hyun-Sook Kim, Sung-Soo Kim, Hyunsoo Yong, Dongeun Lee, Kyungwon |
author_facet | Jun, Son Young Kim, Young Ah Lee, Suk-Jun Jung, Woon-Won Kim, Hyun-Sook Kim, Sung-Soo Kim, Hyunsoo Yong, Dongeun Lee, Kyungwon |
author_sort | Jun, Son Young |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Development of an accessible method to routinely evaluate the clonality of strains is needed in microbiology laboratories. We compared the discriminatory power of the Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy–based IR Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Bremen, Germany) to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as the reference method. METHODS: Eighty-three extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Escherichia coli isolates were tested using WGS, MALDI-TOF MS, and IR Biotyper. Simpson’s diversity index (SDI), a statistical analysis for testing the homogeneity of a dendrogram, and the adjusted Rand index (aRI) were used to compare the discriminatory ability between typing tests. RESULTS: The SDI (95% confidence interval) was 0.969 (0.952–0.985) for WGS, 0.865 (0.807–0.924) for MALDI-TOF MS, and 0.974 (0.965–0.983) for IR Biotyper. Compared with WGS, IR Biotyper showed compatible diversity, whereas MALDI-TOF MS did not. The concordance and aRI improved from 66.3% to 84.3% and from 0.173 to 0.538, respectively, for IR Biotyper versus MALDI-TOF MS with WGS as the reference method. IR Biotyper showed substantially improved performance in strain typing compared with MALDI-TOF MS. CONCLUSIONS: IR Biotyper is useful for diversity analysis with improved discriminatory power over MALDI-TOF MS in comparison with WGS as a reference method. IR Biotyper is an accessible method to evaluate the clonality of strains and could be applied in epidemiological analysis during an outbreak of a health care facility, as well as for research on the transmission of resistant bacteria in community settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9618903 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96189032022-12-26 Performance Comparison Between Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy–based IR Biotyper and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Strain Diversity Jun, Son Young Kim, Young Ah Lee, Suk-Jun Jung, Woon-Won Kim, Hyun-Sook Kim, Sung-Soo Kim, Hyunsoo Yong, Dongeun Lee, Kyungwon Ann Lab Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Development of an accessible method to routinely evaluate the clonality of strains is needed in microbiology laboratories. We compared the discriminatory power of the Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy–based IR Biotyper (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Bremen, Germany) to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as the reference method. METHODS: Eighty-three extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Escherichia coli isolates were tested using WGS, MALDI-TOF MS, and IR Biotyper. Simpson’s diversity index (SDI), a statistical analysis for testing the homogeneity of a dendrogram, and the adjusted Rand index (aRI) were used to compare the discriminatory ability between typing tests. RESULTS: The SDI (95% confidence interval) was 0.969 (0.952–0.985) for WGS, 0.865 (0.807–0.924) for MALDI-TOF MS, and 0.974 (0.965–0.983) for IR Biotyper. Compared with WGS, IR Biotyper showed compatible diversity, whereas MALDI-TOF MS did not. The concordance and aRI improved from 66.3% to 84.3% and from 0.173 to 0.538, respectively, for IR Biotyper versus MALDI-TOF MS with WGS as the reference method. IR Biotyper showed substantially improved performance in strain typing compared with MALDI-TOF MS. CONCLUSIONS: IR Biotyper is useful for diversity analysis with improved discriminatory power over MALDI-TOF MS in comparison with WGS as a reference method. IR Biotyper is an accessible method to evaluate the clonality of strains and could be applied in epidemiological analysis during an outbreak of a health care facility, as well as for research on the transmission of resistant bacteria in community settings. Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2023-03-01 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9618903/ /pubmed/36281511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.2.174 Text en © Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jun, Son Young Kim, Young Ah Lee, Suk-Jun Jung, Woon-Won Kim, Hyun-Sook Kim, Sung-Soo Kim, Hyunsoo Yong, Dongeun Lee, Kyungwon Performance Comparison Between Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy–based IR Biotyper and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Strain Diversity |
title | Performance Comparison Between Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy–based IR Biotyper and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Strain Diversity |
title_full | Performance Comparison Between Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy–based IR Biotyper and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Strain Diversity |
title_fullStr | Performance Comparison Between Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy–based IR Biotyper and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Strain Diversity |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance Comparison Between Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy–based IR Biotyper and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Strain Diversity |
title_short | Performance Comparison Between Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy–based IR Biotyper and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Strain Diversity |
title_sort | performance comparison between fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy–based ir biotyper and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for strain diversity |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618903/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36281511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.2.174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT junsonyoung performancecomparisonbetweenfouriertransforminfraredspectroscopybasedirbiotyperandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryforstraindiversity AT kimyoungah performancecomparisonbetweenfouriertransforminfraredspectroscopybasedirbiotyperandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryforstraindiversity AT leesukjun performancecomparisonbetweenfouriertransforminfraredspectroscopybasedirbiotyperandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryforstraindiversity AT jungwoonwon performancecomparisonbetweenfouriertransforminfraredspectroscopybasedirbiotyperandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryforstraindiversity AT kimhyunsook performancecomparisonbetweenfouriertransforminfraredspectroscopybasedirbiotyperandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryforstraindiversity AT kimsungsoo performancecomparisonbetweenfouriertransforminfraredspectroscopybasedirbiotyperandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryforstraindiversity AT kimhyunsoo performancecomparisonbetweenfouriertransforminfraredspectroscopybasedirbiotyperandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryforstraindiversity AT yongdongeun performancecomparisonbetweenfouriertransforminfraredspectroscopybasedirbiotyperandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryforstraindiversity AT leekyungwon performancecomparisonbetweenfouriertransforminfraredspectroscopybasedirbiotyperandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryforstraindiversity |