Cargando…

Diagnostic Value of DCE-MRI for Differentiating Malignant Adnexal Masses Compared with Contrast-enhanced-T1WI

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced-MR (DCE-MR) and delayed contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI added to unenhanced MRI, including diffusion weighted image (DWI) for differentiating malignant adnexal tumors, conducting a retrospective blinded image interpretation study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otani, Satoshi, Kido, Aki, Himoto, Yuki, Sakata, Akihiko, Otani, Tomoaki, Kuwahara, Ryo, Moribata, Yusaku, Nishio, Naoko, Yajima, Ryo, Nakao, Kyoko, Kurata, Yasuhisa, Minamiguchi, Sachiko, Mandai, Masaki, Nakamoto, Yuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483226
http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0003
_version_ 1784821160108621824
author Otani, Satoshi
Kido, Aki
Himoto, Yuki
Sakata, Akihiko
Otani, Tomoaki
Kuwahara, Ryo
Moribata, Yusaku
Nishio, Naoko
Yajima, Ryo
Nakao, Kyoko
Kurata, Yasuhisa
Minamiguchi, Sachiko
Mandai, Masaki
Nakamoto, Yuji
author_facet Otani, Satoshi
Kido, Aki
Himoto, Yuki
Sakata, Akihiko
Otani, Tomoaki
Kuwahara, Ryo
Moribata, Yusaku
Nishio, Naoko
Yajima, Ryo
Nakao, Kyoko
Kurata, Yasuhisa
Minamiguchi, Sachiko
Mandai, Masaki
Nakamoto, Yuji
author_sort Otani, Satoshi
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced-MR (DCE-MR) and delayed contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI added to unenhanced MRI, including diffusion weighted image (DWI) for differentiating malignant adnexal tumors, conducting a retrospective blinded image interpretation study. Methods: Data of 80 patients suspected of having adnexal tumors by ultrasonography between April 2008 and August 2018 were used for the study. All patients had undergone preoperative MRI and surgical resection at our institution. Four radiologists (two specialized in gynecological radiology and two non-specialized) were enrolled for blinded review of the MR images. A 3-point scale was used: 0 = benign, 1 = indeterminate, and 2 = malignant. Three imaging sets were reviewed: Set A, unenhanced MRI including DWI; Set B, Set A and delayed CE-T1WI; and Set C, Set A and DCE-MRI. Imaging criteria for benign and malignant tumors were given in earlier reports. The diagnostic performance of the three imaging sets of the four readers was calculated. Their areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared using the DeLong method. Results: Accuracies of Set B were 81%–88%. Those of Set C were 81%–85%. The AUCs of Set B were 0.83 and 0.89. Those of Set C were 0.81–0.86. For two readers, Set A showed lower accuracy and AUC than Set B/Set C (less than 0.80), although those were equivalent in other readers. No significant difference in AUCs was found among the three sequence sets. Intrareader agreement was moderate to almost perfect in Sets A and B, and substantial to almost perfect in Set C. Conclusion: DCE-MR showed no superiority for differentiating malignant adnexal tumors from benign tumors compared to delayed CE-T1WI with conventional MR and DWI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9618924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96189242022-11-14 Diagnostic Value of DCE-MRI for Differentiating Malignant Adnexal Masses Compared with Contrast-enhanced-T1WI Otani, Satoshi Kido, Aki Himoto, Yuki Sakata, Akihiko Otani, Tomoaki Kuwahara, Ryo Moribata, Yusaku Nishio, Naoko Yajima, Ryo Nakao, Kyoko Kurata, Yasuhisa Minamiguchi, Sachiko Mandai, Masaki Nakamoto, Yuji Magn Reson Med Sci Major Paper Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced-MR (DCE-MR) and delayed contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI added to unenhanced MRI, including diffusion weighted image (DWI) for differentiating malignant adnexal tumors, conducting a retrospective blinded image interpretation study. Methods: Data of 80 patients suspected of having adnexal tumors by ultrasonography between April 2008 and August 2018 were used for the study. All patients had undergone preoperative MRI and surgical resection at our institution. Four radiologists (two specialized in gynecological radiology and two non-specialized) were enrolled for blinded review of the MR images. A 3-point scale was used: 0 = benign, 1 = indeterminate, and 2 = malignant. Three imaging sets were reviewed: Set A, unenhanced MRI including DWI; Set B, Set A and delayed CE-T1WI; and Set C, Set A and DCE-MRI. Imaging criteria for benign and malignant tumors were given in earlier reports. The diagnostic performance of the three imaging sets of the four readers was calculated. Their areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared using the DeLong method. Results: Accuracies of Set B were 81%–88%. Those of Set C were 81%–85%. The AUCs of Set B were 0.83 and 0.89. Those of Set C were 0.81–0.86. For two readers, Set A showed lower accuracy and AUC than Set B/Set C (less than 0.80), although those were equivalent in other readers. No significant difference in AUCs was found among the three sequence sets. Intrareader agreement was moderate to almost perfect in Sets A and B, and substantial to almost perfect in Set C. Conclusion: DCE-MR showed no superiority for differentiating malignant adnexal tumors from benign tumors compared to delayed CE-T1WI with conventional MR and DWI. Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9618924/ /pubmed/34483226 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0003 Text en ©2021 Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Major Paper
Otani, Satoshi
Kido, Aki
Himoto, Yuki
Sakata, Akihiko
Otani, Tomoaki
Kuwahara, Ryo
Moribata, Yusaku
Nishio, Naoko
Yajima, Ryo
Nakao, Kyoko
Kurata, Yasuhisa
Minamiguchi, Sachiko
Mandai, Masaki
Nakamoto, Yuji
Diagnostic Value of DCE-MRI for Differentiating Malignant Adnexal Masses Compared with Contrast-enhanced-T1WI
title Diagnostic Value of DCE-MRI for Differentiating Malignant Adnexal Masses Compared with Contrast-enhanced-T1WI
title_full Diagnostic Value of DCE-MRI for Differentiating Malignant Adnexal Masses Compared with Contrast-enhanced-T1WI
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value of DCE-MRI for Differentiating Malignant Adnexal Masses Compared with Contrast-enhanced-T1WI
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value of DCE-MRI for Differentiating Malignant Adnexal Masses Compared with Contrast-enhanced-T1WI
title_short Diagnostic Value of DCE-MRI for Differentiating Malignant Adnexal Masses Compared with Contrast-enhanced-T1WI
title_sort diagnostic value of dce-mri for differentiating malignant adnexal masses compared with contrast-enhanced-t1wi
topic Major Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34483226
http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0003
work_keys_str_mv AT otanisatoshi diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi
AT kidoaki diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi
AT himotoyuki diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi
AT sakataakihiko diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi
AT otanitomoaki diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi
AT kuwahararyo diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi
AT moribatayusaku diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi
AT nishionaoko diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi
AT yajimaryo diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi
AT nakaokyoko diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi
AT kuratayasuhisa diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi
AT minamiguchisachiko diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi
AT mandaimasaki diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi
AT nakamotoyuji diagnosticvalueofdcemrifordifferentiatingmalignantadnexalmassescomparedwithcontrastenhancedt1wi