Cargando…

Clinical Application of MPRAGE Wave Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging (Wave-CAIPI): A Comparative Study with MPRAGE GRAPPA

Purpose: To compare reliability and elucidate clinical application of magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) with 9-fold acceleration by using wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3) in comparison to conventional MPRAGE accelerated by using generalized autocalibr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakurama, Azusa, Fushimi, Yasutaka, Nakajima, Satoshi, Sakata, Akihiko, Hinoda, Takuya, Oshima, Sonoko, Otani, Sayo, Wicaksono, Krishna Pandu, Liu, Wei, Maki, Takakuni, Okada, Tomohisa, Takahashi, Ryosuke, Nakamoto, Yuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34602534
http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0065
_version_ 1784821162631495680
author Sakurama, Azusa
Fushimi, Yasutaka
Nakajima, Satoshi
Sakata, Akihiko
Hinoda, Takuya
Oshima, Sonoko
Otani, Sayo
Wicaksono, Krishna Pandu
Liu, Wei
Maki, Takakuni
Okada, Tomohisa
Takahashi, Ryosuke
Nakamoto, Yuji
author_facet Sakurama, Azusa
Fushimi, Yasutaka
Nakajima, Satoshi
Sakata, Akihiko
Hinoda, Takuya
Oshima, Sonoko
Otani, Sayo
Wicaksono, Krishna Pandu
Liu, Wei
Maki, Takakuni
Okada, Tomohisa
Takahashi, Ryosuke
Nakamoto, Yuji
author_sort Sakurama, Azusa
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To compare reliability and elucidate clinical application of magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) with 9-fold acceleration by using wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3) in comparison to conventional MPRAGE accelerated by using generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) 2 × 1. Methods: A total of 26 healthy volunteers and 33 patients were included in this study. Subjects were scanned with two MPRAGEs, GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 acquired in 5 min 21 s and 1 min 42 s, respectively, on a 3T MR scanner. Healthy volunteers underwent additional two MPRAGEs (CAIPI 3 × 3 and GRAPPA 3 × 3). The image quality of the four MPRAGEs was visually evaluated with a 5-point scale in healthy volunteers, and the SNR of four MPRAGEs was also calculated by measuring the phantom 10 times with each MPRAGE. Based on the results of the visual evaluation, voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analyses, including subfield analysis, were performed only for GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3. Correlation of segmentation results between GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 was assessed. Results: In visual evaluations, scores for MPRAGE GRAPPA 2 × 1 (mean rank: 4.00) were significantly better than those for Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 (mean rank: 3.00), CAIPI 3 × 3 (mean rank: 1.83), and GRAPPA 3 × 3 (mean rank: 1.17), and scores for Wave-CAIPI 3×3 were significantly better than those for CAIPI 3 × 3 and GRAPPA 3 × 3. Image noise was evident at the center for additional MPRAGE CAIPI 3 × 3 and GRAPPA 3 × 3. The correlation of segmentation results between GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 was higher than 0.85 in all VOIs except globus pallidus. Subfield analysis of hippocampus also showed a high correlation between GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3. Conclusion: MPRAGE Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 shows relatively better contrast, despite of its short scan time of 1 min 42 s. The volumes derived from automated segmentation of MPRAGE Wave-CAIPI are considered to be reliable measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9618934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96189342022-11-14 Clinical Application of MPRAGE Wave Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging (Wave-CAIPI): A Comparative Study with MPRAGE GRAPPA Sakurama, Azusa Fushimi, Yasutaka Nakajima, Satoshi Sakata, Akihiko Hinoda, Takuya Oshima, Sonoko Otani, Sayo Wicaksono, Krishna Pandu Liu, Wei Maki, Takakuni Okada, Tomohisa Takahashi, Ryosuke Nakamoto, Yuji Magn Reson Med Sci Major Paper Purpose: To compare reliability and elucidate clinical application of magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) with 9-fold acceleration by using wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3) in comparison to conventional MPRAGE accelerated by using generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) 2 × 1. Methods: A total of 26 healthy volunteers and 33 patients were included in this study. Subjects were scanned with two MPRAGEs, GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 acquired in 5 min 21 s and 1 min 42 s, respectively, on a 3T MR scanner. Healthy volunteers underwent additional two MPRAGEs (CAIPI 3 × 3 and GRAPPA 3 × 3). The image quality of the four MPRAGEs was visually evaluated with a 5-point scale in healthy volunteers, and the SNR of four MPRAGEs was also calculated by measuring the phantom 10 times with each MPRAGE. Based on the results of the visual evaluation, voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analyses, including subfield analysis, were performed only for GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3. Correlation of segmentation results between GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 was assessed. Results: In visual evaluations, scores for MPRAGE GRAPPA 2 × 1 (mean rank: 4.00) were significantly better than those for Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 (mean rank: 3.00), CAIPI 3 × 3 (mean rank: 1.83), and GRAPPA 3 × 3 (mean rank: 1.17), and scores for Wave-CAIPI 3×3 were significantly better than those for CAIPI 3 × 3 and GRAPPA 3 × 3. Image noise was evident at the center for additional MPRAGE CAIPI 3 × 3 and GRAPPA 3 × 3. The correlation of segmentation results between GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 was higher than 0.85 in all VOIs except globus pallidus. Subfield analysis of hippocampus also showed a high correlation between GRAPPA 2 × 1 and Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3. Conclusion: MPRAGE Wave-CAIPI 3 × 3 shows relatively better contrast, despite of its short scan time of 1 min 42 s. The volumes derived from automated segmentation of MPRAGE Wave-CAIPI are considered to be reliable measures. Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2021-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9618934/ /pubmed/34602534 http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0065 Text en ©2021 Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Major Paper
Sakurama, Azusa
Fushimi, Yasutaka
Nakajima, Satoshi
Sakata, Akihiko
Hinoda, Takuya
Oshima, Sonoko
Otani, Sayo
Wicaksono, Krishna Pandu
Liu, Wei
Maki, Takakuni
Okada, Tomohisa
Takahashi, Ryosuke
Nakamoto, Yuji
Clinical Application of MPRAGE Wave Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging (Wave-CAIPI): A Comparative Study with MPRAGE GRAPPA
title Clinical Application of MPRAGE Wave Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging (Wave-CAIPI): A Comparative Study with MPRAGE GRAPPA
title_full Clinical Application of MPRAGE Wave Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging (Wave-CAIPI): A Comparative Study with MPRAGE GRAPPA
title_fullStr Clinical Application of MPRAGE Wave Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging (Wave-CAIPI): A Comparative Study with MPRAGE GRAPPA
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Application of MPRAGE Wave Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging (Wave-CAIPI): A Comparative Study with MPRAGE GRAPPA
title_short Clinical Application of MPRAGE Wave Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging (Wave-CAIPI): A Comparative Study with MPRAGE GRAPPA
title_sort clinical application of mprage wave controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (wave-caipi): a comparative study with mprage grappa
topic Major Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34602534
http://dx.doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0065
work_keys_str_mv AT sakuramaazusa clinicalapplicationofmpragewavecontrolledaliasinginparallelimagingwavecaipiacomparativestudywithmpragegrappa
AT fushimiyasutaka clinicalapplicationofmpragewavecontrolledaliasinginparallelimagingwavecaipiacomparativestudywithmpragegrappa
AT nakajimasatoshi clinicalapplicationofmpragewavecontrolledaliasinginparallelimagingwavecaipiacomparativestudywithmpragegrappa
AT sakataakihiko clinicalapplicationofmpragewavecontrolledaliasinginparallelimagingwavecaipiacomparativestudywithmpragegrappa
AT hinodatakuya clinicalapplicationofmpragewavecontrolledaliasinginparallelimagingwavecaipiacomparativestudywithmpragegrappa
AT oshimasonoko clinicalapplicationofmpragewavecontrolledaliasinginparallelimagingwavecaipiacomparativestudywithmpragegrappa
AT otanisayo clinicalapplicationofmpragewavecontrolledaliasinginparallelimagingwavecaipiacomparativestudywithmpragegrappa
AT wicaksonokrishnapandu clinicalapplicationofmpragewavecontrolledaliasinginparallelimagingwavecaipiacomparativestudywithmpragegrappa
AT liuwei clinicalapplicationofmpragewavecontrolledaliasinginparallelimagingwavecaipiacomparativestudywithmpragegrappa
AT makitakakuni clinicalapplicationofmpragewavecontrolledaliasinginparallelimagingwavecaipiacomparativestudywithmpragegrappa
AT okadatomohisa clinicalapplicationofmpragewavecontrolledaliasinginparallelimagingwavecaipiacomparativestudywithmpragegrappa
AT takahashiryosuke clinicalapplicationofmpragewavecontrolledaliasinginparallelimagingwavecaipiacomparativestudywithmpragegrappa
AT nakamotoyuji clinicalapplicationofmpragewavecontrolledaliasinginparallelimagingwavecaipiacomparativestudywithmpragegrappa