Cargando…

Comparing the effects of endometrial injury in the luteal phase and follicular phase on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that endometrial injury improves clinical pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment with a history of implantation failure. However, endometrial injury can be performed in the follicul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yang, Bu, Zhiqin, Hu, Linli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1004265
_version_ 1784821168099819520
author Wang, Yang
Bu, Zhiqin
Hu, Linli
author_facet Wang, Yang
Bu, Zhiqin
Hu, Linli
author_sort Wang, Yang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that endometrial injury improves clinical pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment with a history of implantation failure. However, endometrial injury can be performed in the follicular phase (FP) followed by embryo transfer in the same menstrual cycle or in the luteal phase (LP) before the embryo transfer cycle. METHOD: This prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2015 to September 2021, and a total of 487 patients were included. All included patients had a history of a failed implantation cycle. They were divided into two groups: the FP group (N = 330), in which endometrial injury was performed on menstrual day 3-5, and the LP group (N = 157), in which endometrial injury was performed in the cycle preceding embryo transfer 7 days after ovulation. RESULTS: First, in unselected patients, the implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were comparable between the LP and FP groups. However, in patients with a history of ≥ 2 failed transfer cycles, the implantation rate was significantly higher in the LP group than in FP group (43.09% versus 33.33%, P = 0.03). Moreover, the clinical pregnancy rate was also significantly higher in patients in the LP group than in patients in the FP group (60.17% versus 46.15%, P=0.02). In addition, logistic regression analysis showed that endometrial injury in the LP group was an independent factor affecting clinical pregnancy outcome in patients with a history of ≥ 2 failed transfer cycles (aOR = 2.05, 90% CI:1.22-3.47, P=0.01). CONCLUSION: Endometrial injury improves pregnancy outcomes when performed in the luteal phase compared with the follicular phase in patients with a history of ≥ 2 failed transfer cycles but not in unselected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9618956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96189562022-11-01 Comparing the effects of endometrial injury in the luteal phase and follicular phase on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes Wang, Yang Bu, Zhiqin Hu, Linli Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that endometrial injury improves clinical pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment with a history of implantation failure. However, endometrial injury can be performed in the follicular phase (FP) followed by embryo transfer in the same menstrual cycle or in the luteal phase (LP) before the embryo transfer cycle. METHOD: This prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2015 to September 2021, and a total of 487 patients were included. All included patients had a history of a failed implantation cycle. They were divided into two groups: the FP group (N = 330), in which endometrial injury was performed on menstrual day 3-5, and the LP group (N = 157), in which endometrial injury was performed in the cycle preceding embryo transfer 7 days after ovulation. RESULTS: First, in unselected patients, the implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate were comparable between the LP and FP groups. However, in patients with a history of ≥ 2 failed transfer cycles, the implantation rate was significantly higher in the LP group than in FP group (43.09% versus 33.33%, P = 0.03). Moreover, the clinical pregnancy rate was also significantly higher in patients in the LP group than in patients in the FP group (60.17% versus 46.15%, P=0.02). In addition, logistic regression analysis showed that endometrial injury in the LP group was an independent factor affecting clinical pregnancy outcome in patients with a history of ≥ 2 failed transfer cycles (aOR = 2.05, 90% CI:1.22-3.47, P=0.01). CONCLUSION: Endometrial injury improves pregnancy outcomes when performed in the luteal phase compared with the follicular phase in patients with a history of ≥ 2 failed transfer cycles but not in unselected patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9618956/ /pubmed/36325450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1004265 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Bu and Hu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Wang, Yang
Bu, Zhiqin
Hu, Linli
Comparing the effects of endometrial injury in the luteal phase and follicular phase on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes
title Comparing the effects of endometrial injury in the luteal phase and follicular phase on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes
title_full Comparing the effects of endometrial injury in the luteal phase and follicular phase on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes
title_fullStr Comparing the effects of endometrial injury in the luteal phase and follicular phase on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effects of endometrial injury in the luteal phase and follicular phase on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes
title_short Comparing the effects of endometrial injury in the luteal phase and follicular phase on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes
title_sort comparing the effects of endometrial injury in the luteal phase and follicular phase on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1004265
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyang comparingtheeffectsofendometrialinjuryinthelutealphaseandfollicularphaseoninvitrofertilizationtreatmentoutcomes
AT buzhiqin comparingtheeffectsofendometrialinjuryinthelutealphaseandfollicularphaseoninvitrofertilizationtreatmentoutcomes
AT hulinli comparingtheeffectsofendometrialinjuryinthelutealphaseandfollicularphaseoninvitrofertilizationtreatmentoutcomes