Cargando…

A Comprehensive Review and Bifactor Modeling Analysis of the Brief COPE

The Brief COPE is a measure of coping strategies that contains 14 factors. The purpose of this research was twofold: (a) examine the psychometric proprieties of the Brief Cope in previous studies; and (b) perform Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) with second-order model and bifactor model specifica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodrigues, Filipe, Figueiredo, Nuno, Rodrigues, José, Ferreira, Regina, Hernández-Mendo, Antonio, Monteiro, Diogo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9619253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36305610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00469580221108127
_version_ 1784821235422593024
author Rodrigues, Filipe
Figueiredo, Nuno
Rodrigues, José
Ferreira, Regina
Hernández-Mendo, Antonio
Monteiro, Diogo
author_facet Rodrigues, Filipe
Figueiredo, Nuno
Rodrigues, José
Ferreira, Regina
Hernández-Mendo, Antonio
Monteiro, Diogo
author_sort Rodrigues, Filipe
collection PubMed
description The Brief COPE is a measure of coping strategies that contains 14 factors. The purpose of this research was twofold: (a) examine the psychometric proprieties of the Brief Cope in previous studies; and (b) perform Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) with second-order model and bifactor model specifications that could be used to assess the best model that represents the 14 coping strategies inherent to the instrument. In order to meet the first objective, a bibliographic review of published peer-reviewed studies between 1997 and 2021 was conducted. Results from the review identified 50 studies, of which 21 used exploratory factor analysis, 28 CFA and one study test-retest analysis. Seventeen studies used the entire correlated 14-factor structure. However, only 11 studies conducted a CFA. For the second objective, a sample of 472 working class individuals (female = 278) with a mean work experience of 19.06 years (SD = 11,92) were recruited. We tested several model specifications, convergent and discriminant validity analysis. We found the correlated 14-factor structure of the Brief COPE to have good psychometric properties. The second-order and bifactor model specifications displayed poor fit or did not converge, respectively. The measure showed good convergent and discriminant validity, and the subscales showed adequate internal consistency. We provide further validity and reliability of the correlated 14-factor structure, evidencing that this measure can assess coping mechanisms. Second-order model specifications need further testing and empirical evidence to support such hierarchical categorization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9619253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96192532022-11-01 A Comprehensive Review and Bifactor Modeling Analysis of the Brief COPE Rodrigues, Filipe Figueiredo, Nuno Rodrigues, José Ferreira, Regina Hernández-Mendo, Antonio Monteiro, Diogo Inquiry Review Article (excluding Systematic Reviews) The Brief COPE is a measure of coping strategies that contains 14 factors. The purpose of this research was twofold: (a) examine the psychometric proprieties of the Brief Cope in previous studies; and (b) perform Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) with second-order model and bifactor model specifications that could be used to assess the best model that represents the 14 coping strategies inherent to the instrument. In order to meet the first objective, a bibliographic review of published peer-reviewed studies between 1997 and 2021 was conducted. Results from the review identified 50 studies, of which 21 used exploratory factor analysis, 28 CFA and one study test-retest analysis. Seventeen studies used the entire correlated 14-factor structure. However, only 11 studies conducted a CFA. For the second objective, a sample of 472 working class individuals (female = 278) with a mean work experience of 19.06 years (SD = 11,92) were recruited. We tested several model specifications, convergent and discriminant validity analysis. We found the correlated 14-factor structure of the Brief COPE to have good psychometric properties. The second-order and bifactor model specifications displayed poor fit or did not converge, respectively. The measure showed good convergent and discriminant validity, and the subscales showed adequate internal consistency. We provide further validity and reliability of the correlated 14-factor structure, evidencing that this measure can assess coping mechanisms. Second-order model specifications need further testing and empirical evidence to support such hierarchical categorization. SAGE Publications 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9619253/ /pubmed/36305610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00469580221108127 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Article (excluding Systematic Reviews)
Rodrigues, Filipe
Figueiredo, Nuno
Rodrigues, José
Ferreira, Regina
Hernández-Mendo, Antonio
Monteiro, Diogo
A Comprehensive Review and Bifactor Modeling Analysis of the Brief COPE
title A Comprehensive Review and Bifactor Modeling Analysis of the Brief COPE
title_full A Comprehensive Review and Bifactor Modeling Analysis of the Brief COPE
title_fullStr A Comprehensive Review and Bifactor Modeling Analysis of the Brief COPE
title_full_unstemmed A Comprehensive Review and Bifactor Modeling Analysis of the Brief COPE
title_short A Comprehensive Review and Bifactor Modeling Analysis of the Brief COPE
title_sort comprehensive review and bifactor modeling analysis of the brief cope
topic Review Article (excluding Systematic Reviews)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9619253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36305610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00469580221108127
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguesfilipe acomprehensivereviewandbifactormodelinganalysisofthebriefcope
AT figueiredonuno acomprehensivereviewandbifactormodelinganalysisofthebriefcope
AT rodriguesjose acomprehensivereviewandbifactormodelinganalysisofthebriefcope
AT ferreiraregina acomprehensivereviewandbifactormodelinganalysisofthebriefcope
AT hernandezmendoantonio acomprehensivereviewandbifactormodelinganalysisofthebriefcope
AT monteirodiogo acomprehensivereviewandbifactormodelinganalysisofthebriefcope
AT rodriguesfilipe comprehensivereviewandbifactormodelinganalysisofthebriefcope
AT figueiredonuno comprehensivereviewandbifactormodelinganalysisofthebriefcope
AT rodriguesjose comprehensivereviewandbifactormodelinganalysisofthebriefcope
AT ferreiraregina comprehensivereviewandbifactormodelinganalysisofthebriefcope
AT hernandezmendoantonio comprehensivereviewandbifactormodelinganalysisofthebriefcope
AT monteirodiogo comprehensivereviewandbifactormodelinganalysisofthebriefcope