Cargando…
Neural network–based fully automated cardiac resting phase detection algorithm compared with manual detection in patients
BACKGROUND: A cardiac resting phase is used when performing free-breathing cardiac magnetic resonance examinations. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test a cardiac resting phase detection system based on neural networks in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four chamber-view cine imag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9619276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601221137772 |
_version_ | 1784821240711610368 |
---|---|
author | Ogawa, Ryo Kido, Tomoyuki Shiraishi, Yasuhiro Yagi, Yuri Su Yoon, Seung Wetzl, Jens Schmidt, Michaela Kido, Teruhito |
author_facet | Ogawa, Ryo Kido, Tomoyuki Shiraishi, Yasuhiro Yagi, Yuri Su Yoon, Seung Wetzl, Jens Schmidt, Michaela Kido, Teruhito |
author_sort | Ogawa, Ryo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A cardiac resting phase is used when performing free-breathing cardiac magnetic resonance examinations. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test a cardiac resting phase detection system based on neural networks in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four chamber-view cine images were obtained from 32 patients and analyzed. The rest duration, start point, and end point were compared between that determined by the experts and general operators, and a similar comparison was done between that determined by the experts and neural networks: the normalized root-mean-square error (RMSE) was also calculated. RESULTS: Unlike manual detection, the neural network was able to determine the resting phase almost simultaneously as the image was obtained. The rest duration and start point were not significantly different between the neural network and expert (p = .30, .90, respectively), whereas the end point was significantly different between the two groups (p < .05). The start point was not significantly different between the general operator and expert (p = .09), whereas the rest duration and end point were significantly different between the two groups (p < .05). The normalized RMSEs of the rest duration, start point, and end point of the neural network were 0.88, 0.64, and 0.33 ms, respectively, which were lower than those of the general operator (normalized RMSE values were 0.98, 0.68, and 0.51 ms, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The neural network can determine the resting phase instantly with better accuracy than the manual detection of general operators. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9619276 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96192762022-11-01 Neural network–based fully automated cardiac resting phase detection algorithm compared with manual detection in patients Ogawa, Ryo Kido, Tomoyuki Shiraishi, Yasuhiro Yagi, Yuri Su Yoon, Seung Wetzl, Jens Schmidt, Michaela Kido, Teruhito Acta Radiol Open Original Article BACKGROUND: A cardiac resting phase is used when performing free-breathing cardiac magnetic resonance examinations. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test a cardiac resting phase detection system based on neural networks in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four chamber-view cine images were obtained from 32 patients and analyzed. The rest duration, start point, and end point were compared between that determined by the experts and general operators, and a similar comparison was done between that determined by the experts and neural networks: the normalized root-mean-square error (RMSE) was also calculated. RESULTS: Unlike manual detection, the neural network was able to determine the resting phase almost simultaneously as the image was obtained. The rest duration and start point were not significantly different between the neural network and expert (p = .30, .90, respectively), whereas the end point was significantly different between the two groups (p < .05). The start point was not significantly different between the general operator and expert (p = .09), whereas the rest duration and end point were significantly different between the two groups (p < .05). The normalized RMSEs of the rest duration, start point, and end point of the neural network were 0.88, 0.64, and 0.33 ms, respectively, which were lower than those of the general operator (normalized RMSE values were 0.98, 0.68, and 0.51 ms, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The neural network can determine the resting phase instantly with better accuracy than the manual detection of general operators. SAGE Publications 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9619276/ /pubmed/36325309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601221137772 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ogawa, Ryo Kido, Tomoyuki Shiraishi, Yasuhiro Yagi, Yuri Su Yoon, Seung Wetzl, Jens Schmidt, Michaela Kido, Teruhito Neural network–based fully automated cardiac resting phase detection algorithm compared with manual detection in patients |
title | Neural network–based fully automated cardiac resting phase detection algorithm compared with manual detection in patients |
title_full | Neural network–based fully automated cardiac resting phase detection algorithm compared with manual detection in patients |
title_fullStr | Neural network–based fully automated cardiac resting phase detection algorithm compared with manual detection in patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Neural network–based fully automated cardiac resting phase detection algorithm compared with manual detection in patients |
title_short | Neural network–based fully automated cardiac resting phase detection algorithm compared with manual detection in patients |
title_sort | neural network–based fully automated cardiac resting phase detection algorithm compared with manual detection in patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9619276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601221137772 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogawaryo neuralnetworkbasedfullyautomatedcardiacrestingphasedetectionalgorithmcomparedwithmanualdetectioninpatients AT kidotomoyuki neuralnetworkbasedfullyautomatedcardiacrestingphasedetectionalgorithmcomparedwithmanualdetectioninpatients AT shiraishiyasuhiro neuralnetworkbasedfullyautomatedcardiacrestingphasedetectionalgorithmcomparedwithmanualdetectioninpatients AT yagiyuri neuralnetworkbasedfullyautomatedcardiacrestingphasedetectionalgorithmcomparedwithmanualdetectioninpatients AT suyoonseung neuralnetworkbasedfullyautomatedcardiacrestingphasedetectionalgorithmcomparedwithmanualdetectioninpatients AT wetzljens neuralnetworkbasedfullyautomatedcardiacrestingphasedetectionalgorithmcomparedwithmanualdetectioninpatients AT schmidtmichaela neuralnetworkbasedfullyautomatedcardiacrestingphasedetectionalgorithmcomparedwithmanualdetectioninpatients AT kidoteruhito neuralnetworkbasedfullyautomatedcardiacrestingphasedetectionalgorithmcomparedwithmanualdetectioninpatients |