Cargando…

Leveraging Serosurveillance and Postmortem Surveillance to Quantify the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Africa

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a devastating impact on global health, the magnitude of which appears to differ intercontinentally: For example, reports suggest that 271 900 per million people have been infected in Europe versus 8800 per million people in Africa....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kogan, Nicole E, Gantt, Shae, Swerdlow, David, Viboud, Cécile, Semakula, Muhammed, Lipsitch, Marc, Santillana, Mauricio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9619616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac797
_version_ 1784821274769358848
author Kogan, Nicole E
Gantt, Shae
Swerdlow, David
Viboud, Cécile
Semakula, Muhammed
Lipsitch, Marc
Santillana, Mauricio
author_facet Kogan, Nicole E
Gantt, Shae
Swerdlow, David
Viboud, Cécile
Semakula, Muhammed
Lipsitch, Marc
Santillana, Mauricio
author_sort Kogan, Nicole E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a devastating impact on global health, the magnitude of which appears to differ intercontinentally: For example, reports suggest that 271 900 per million people have been infected in Europe versus 8800 per million people in Africa. While Africa is the second-largest continent by population, its reported COVID-19 cases comprise <3% of global cases. Although social and environmental explanations have been proposed to clarify this discrepancy, systematic underascertainment of infections may be equally responsible. METHODS: We sought to quantify magnitudes of underascertainment in COVID-19's cumulative incidence in Africa. Using serosurveillance and postmortem surveillance, we constructed multiplicative factors estimating ratios of true infections to reported cases in Africa since March 2020. RESULTS: Multiplicative factors derived from serology data (subset of 12 nations) suggested a range of COVID-19 reporting rates, from 1 in 2 infections reported in Cape Verde (July 2020) to 1 in 3795 infections reported in Malawi (June 2020). A similar set of multiplicative factors for all nations derived from postmortem data points toward the same conclusion: Reported COVID-19 cases are unrepresentative of true infections, suggesting that a key reason for low case burden in many African nations is significant underdetection and underreporting. CONCLUSIONS: While estimating the exact burden of COVID-19 is challenging, the multiplicative factors we present furnish incidence estimates reflecting likely-to-worst-case ranges of infection. Our results stress the need for expansive surveillance to allocate resources in areas experiencing discrepancies between reported cases, projected infections, and deaths.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9619616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96196162022-11-04 Leveraging Serosurveillance and Postmortem Surveillance to Quantify the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Africa Kogan, Nicole E Gantt, Shae Swerdlow, David Viboud, Cécile Semakula, Muhammed Lipsitch, Marc Santillana, Mauricio Clin Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a devastating impact on global health, the magnitude of which appears to differ intercontinentally: For example, reports suggest that 271 900 per million people have been infected in Europe versus 8800 per million people in Africa. While Africa is the second-largest continent by population, its reported COVID-19 cases comprise <3% of global cases. Although social and environmental explanations have been proposed to clarify this discrepancy, systematic underascertainment of infections may be equally responsible. METHODS: We sought to quantify magnitudes of underascertainment in COVID-19's cumulative incidence in Africa. Using serosurveillance and postmortem surveillance, we constructed multiplicative factors estimating ratios of true infections to reported cases in Africa since March 2020. RESULTS: Multiplicative factors derived from serology data (subset of 12 nations) suggested a range of COVID-19 reporting rates, from 1 in 2 infections reported in Cape Verde (July 2020) to 1 in 3795 infections reported in Malawi (June 2020). A similar set of multiplicative factors for all nations derived from postmortem data points toward the same conclusion: Reported COVID-19 cases are unrepresentative of true infections, suggesting that a key reason for low case burden in many African nations is significant underdetection and underreporting. CONCLUSIONS: While estimating the exact burden of COVID-19 is challenging, the multiplicative factors we present furnish incidence estimates reflecting likely-to-worst-case ranges of infection. Our results stress the need for expansive surveillance to allocate resources in areas experiencing discrepancies between reported cases, projected infections, and deaths. Oxford University Press 2022-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9619616/ /pubmed/36196586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac797 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Article
Kogan, Nicole E
Gantt, Shae
Swerdlow, David
Viboud, Cécile
Semakula, Muhammed
Lipsitch, Marc
Santillana, Mauricio
Leveraging Serosurveillance and Postmortem Surveillance to Quantify the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Africa
title Leveraging Serosurveillance and Postmortem Surveillance to Quantify the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Africa
title_full Leveraging Serosurveillance and Postmortem Surveillance to Quantify the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Africa
title_fullStr Leveraging Serosurveillance and Postmortem Surveillance to Quantify the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Africa
title_full_unstemmed Leveraging Serosurveillance and Postmortem Surveillance to Quantify the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Africa
title_short Leveraging Serosurveillance and Postmortem Surveillance to Quantify the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Africa
title_sort leveraging serosurveillance and postmortem surveillance to quantify the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 in africa
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9619616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac797
work_keys_str_mv AT kogannicolee leveragingserosurveillanceandpostmortemsurveillancetoquantifytheimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019inafrica
AT ganttshae leveragingserosurveillanceandpostmortemsurveillancetoquantifytheimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019inafrica
AT swerdlowdavid leveragingserosurveillanceandpostmortemsurveillancetoquantifytheimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019inafrica
AT viboudcecile leveragingserosurveillanceandpostmortemsurveillancetoquantifytheimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019inafrica
AT semakulamuhammed leveragingserosurveillanceandpostmortemsurveillancetoquantifytheimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019inafrica
AT lipsitchmarc leveragingserosurveillanceandpostmortemsurveillancetoquantifytheimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019inafrica
AT santillanamauricio leveragingserosurveillanceandpostmortemsurveillancetoquantifytheimpactofcoronavirusdisease2019inafrica