Cargando…
Vaccination policy strategies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview
BACKGROUND: The debate on vaccination strategies has been periodically involving researchers, policymakers, and also the population. Interest waves have occurred both after a revival of childhood infectious diseases in 2016-2017, due to low vaccine coverages, and during the recent Coronavirus outbre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9619815/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.232 |
_version_ | 1784821285010800640 |
---|---|
author | Garlasco, J Charrier, L Thomas, R Gardois, P Bo, M Zotti, CM |
author_facet | Garlasco, J Charrier, L Thomas, R Gardois, P Bo, M Zotti, CM |
author_sort | Garlasco, J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The debate on vaccination strategies has been periodically involving researchers, policymakers, and also the population. Interest waves have occurred both after a revival of childhood infectious diseases in 2016-2017, due to low vaccine coverages, and during the recent Coronavirus outbreak. This study aimed at overviewing vaccination strategies (and corresponding vaccine coverages) for childhood vaccinations and SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Measles was chosen as a childhood vaccination indicator. Policy data were retrieved from health institutions (either European or national/regional) and, for COVID-19, also from press agencies and newspaper websites. Vaccine coverage data were retrieved from the World Bank, World Health Organisation, and UNICEF databases (for childhood vaccines), and from the “Our World in Data” platform for SARS-CoV-2. A qualitative comparison was performed between the two contexts. RESULTS: Unlike childhood vaccinations, few countries (and only Austria in Europe) imposed generalised COVID-19 mandates, most countries preferring targeted mandates for higher-risk groups. Many countries confirmed their traditional voluntary vaccination approach also for COVID-19, while countries historically relying on compulsory vaccination strategies, such as Slovenia and Hungary, surprisingly opted for voluntary SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with unsatisfactory results. However, no tangible crude association was generally found between vaccination policies and achieved coverages, although factors such as cultural background, education, and religion appeared to influence the impact of vaccination policies. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 experience has enriched pre-existent vaccination strategy debates by adding interesting elements concerning attitudes toward vaccines in a novel context. Reading the available results in the frame of vaccine hesitancy determinants can help to understand the relationship between policies and actual coverages. KEY MESSAGES: Few countries have imposed generalised mandates for COVID-19, while many preferred targeted obligations for high-risk groups and some countries surprisingly opted for a voluntary approach. Accurately considering social and cultural determinants allows understanding the chance of success of vaccination strategies, ahead of fostering the right policymaking approach for each population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9619815 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96198152022-11-04 Vaccination policy strategies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview Garlasco, J Charrier, L Thomas, R Gardois, P Bo, M Zotti, CM Eur J Public Health Poster Walks BACKGROUND: The debate on vaccination strategies has been periodically involving researchers, policymakers, and also the population. Interest waves have occurred both after a revival of childhood infectious diseases in 2016-2017, due to low vaccine coverages, and during the recent Coronavirus outbreak. This study aimed at overviewing vaccination strategies (and corresponding vaccine coverages) for childhood vaccinations and SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Measles was chosen as a childhood vaccination indicator. Policy data were retrieved from health institutions (either European or national/regional) and, for COVID-19, also from press agencies and newspaper websites. Vaccine coverage data were retrieved from the World Bank, World Health Organisation, and UNICEF databases (for childhood vaccines), and from the “Our World in Data” platform for SARS-CoV-2. A qualitative comparison was performed between the two contexts. RESULTS: Unlike childhood vaccinations, few countries (and only Austria in Europe) imposed generalised COVID-19 mandates, most countries preferring targeted mandates for higher-risk groups. Many countries confirmed their traditional voluntary vaccination approach also for COVID-19, while countries historically relying on compulsory vaccination strategies, such as Slovenia and Hungary, surprisingly opted for voluntary SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with unsatisfactory results. However, no tangible crude association was generally found between vaccination policies and achieved coverages, although factors such as cultural background, education, and religion appeared to influence the impact of vaccination policies. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 experience has enriched pre-existent vaccination strategy debates by adding interesting elements concerning attitudes toward vaccines in a novel context. Reading the available results in the frame of vaccine hesitancy determinants can help to understand the relationship between policies and actual coverages. KEY MESSAGES: Few countries have imposed generalised mandates for COVID-19, while many preferred targeted obligations for high-risk groups and some countries surprisingly opted for a voluntary approach. Accurately considering social and cultural determinants allows understanding the chance of success of vaccination strategies, ahead of fostering the right policymaking approach for each population. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9619815/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.232 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Poster Walks Garlasco, J Charrier, L Thomas, R Gardois, P Bo, M Zotti, CM Vaccination policy strategies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview |
title | Vaccination policy strategies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview |
title_full | Vaccination policy strategies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview |
title_fullStr | Vaccination policy strategies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview |
title_full_unstemmed | Vaccination policy strategies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview |
title_short | Vaccination policy strategies before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview |
title_sort | vaccination policy strategies before and during the covid-19 pandemic: an overview |
topic | Poster Walks |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9619815/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac130.232 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garlascoj vaccinationpolicystrategiesbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicanoverview AT charrierl vaccinationpolicystrategiesbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicanoverview AT thomasr vaccinationpolicystrategiesbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicanoverview AT gardoisp vaccinationpolicystrategiesbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicanoverview AT bom vaccinationpolicystrategiesbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicanoverview AT zotticm vaccinationpolicystrategiesbeforeandduringthecovid19pandemicanoverview |