Cargando…
SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused severe disruptions in healthcare systems and societies and exacerbated existing inequalities for women and girls across every sphere. Our study explores health systems responses to gender equality goals during the COVID-19 pandemic and which role these goals...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9620262/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.103 |
_version_ | 1784821322506829824 |
---|---|
author | Kuhlmann, E Lotta, G Fernandez, M Herten-Crabb, A Maple, J-M MacFehr, L Paina, L Wenham, C Willis, K |
author_facet | Kuhlmann, E Lotta, G Fernandez, M Herten-Crabb, A Maple, J-M MacFehr, L Paina, L Wenham, C Willis, K |
author_sort | Kuhlmann, E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused severe disruptions in healthcare systems and societies and exacerbated existing inequalities for women and girls across every sphere. Our study explores health systems responses to gender equality goals during the COVID-19 pandemic and which role these goals play in pandemic recovery policies. METHODS: We apply a qualitative comparative approach. Country case studies (expert information, secondary sources) were collected in March/April 2022. The sample comprised Australia, Brazil, Germany, United Kingdom and USA, reflecting conditions of high to upper-middle income countries with established public health systems, democratic political institutions and gender equality policies. Selected topics: maternity care/reproductive services, violence against women, and gender equality/female leadership. RESULTS: All countries tried to keep essential maternity and reproductive services open, but strong limitations applied especially for prevention and counselling services; at the same time, digitalisation/telemedicine supported service expansion. Violence against women and children strongly increased during the pandemic. Routine services were partly kept open and new helplines occasionally established, but no action was taken to scale-up mental health support and respond to new demand. A push-back of gender equality was observed across countries in all areas of health and social care, often coupled with strong increase in intersecting social inequalities; participation of women in decision-making bodies was generally weak and not monitored. CONCLUSIONS: Across countries, gender equality policies cracked under the pressure of the COVID-19 pandemic; this is true for countries with male and female political leaders, and for different areas of SDG5 and health. There is an urgent need for more effective intersectional gender equality policies and improved participation of women in global health and in health system recovery plans. KEY MESSAGES: • Health systems failed to take action to protect SDG5 goals; gender and intersecting inequalities strongly increased during the pandemic. • Building back better after COVID-19 will only be possible with an intersectional gender equality programme and feminist policy approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9620262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96202622022-11-04 SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment Kuhlmann, E Lotta, G Fernandez, M Herten-Crabb, A Maple, J-M MacFehr, L Paina, L Wenham, C Willis, K Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused severe disruptions in healthcare systems and societies and exacerbated existing inequalities for women and girls across every sphere. Our study explores health systems responses to gender equality goals during the COVID-19 pandemic and which role these goals play in pandemic recovery policies. METHODS: We apply a qualitative comparative approach. Country case studies (expert information, secondary sources) were collected in March/April 2022. The sample comprised Australia, Brazil, Germany, United Kingdom and USA, reflecting conditions of high to upper-middle income countries with established public health systems, democratic political institutions and gender equality policies. Selected topics: maternity care/reproductive services, violence against women, and gender equality/female leadership. RESULTS: All countries tried to keep essential maternity and reproductive services open, but strong limitations applied especially for prevention and counselling services; at the same time, digitalisation/telemedicine supported service expansion. Violence against women and children strongly increased during the pandemic. Routine services were partly kept open and new helplines occasionally established, but no action was taken to scale-up mental health support and respond to new demand. A push-back of gender equality was observed across countries in all areas of health and social care, often coupled with strong increase in intersecting social inequalities; participation of women in decision-making bodies was generally weak and not monitored. CONCLUSIONS: Across countries, gender equality policies cracked under the pressure of the COVID-19 pandemic; this is true for countries with male and female political leaders, and for different areas of SDG5 and health. There is an urgent need for more effective intersectional gender equality policies and improved participation of women in global health and in health system recovery plans. KEY MESSAGES: • Health systems failed to take action to protect SDG5 goals; gender and intersecting inequalities strongly increased during the pandemic. • Building back better after COVID-19 will only be possible with an intersectional gender equality programme and feminist policy approaches. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9620262/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.103 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Poster Displays Kuhlmann, E Lotta, G Fernandez, M Herten-Crabb, A Maple, J-M MacFehr, L Paina, L Wenham, C Willis, K SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment |
title | SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment |
title_full | SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment |
title_fullStr | SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment |
title_short | SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment |
title_sort | sdg5 gender equality during the covid-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment |
topic | Poster Displays |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9620262/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuhlmanne sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment AT lottag sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment AT fernandezm sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment AT hertencrabba sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment AT maplejm sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment AT macfehrl sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment AT painal sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment AT wenhamc sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment AT willisk sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment |