Cargando…

SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused severe disruptions in healthcare systems and societies and exacerbated existing inequalities for women and girls across every sphere. Our study explores health systems responses to gender equality goals during the COVID-19 pandemic and which role these goals...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuhlmann, E, Lotta, G, Fernandez, M, Herten-Crabb, A, Maple, J-M, MacFehr, L, Paina, L, Wenham, C, Willis, K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9620262/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.103
_version_ 1784821322506829824
author Kuhlmann, E
Lotta, G
Fernandez, M
Herten-Crabb, A
Maple, J-M
MacFehr, L
Paina, L
Wenham, C
Willis, K
author_facet Kuhlmann, E
Lotta, G
Fernandez, M
Herten-Crabb, A
Maple, J-M
MacFehr, L
Paina, L
Wenham, C
Willis, K
author_sort Kuhlmann, E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused severe disruptions in healthcare systems and societies and exacerbated existing inequalities for women and girls across every sphere. Our study explores health systems responses to gender equality goals during the COVID-19 pandemic and which role these goals play in pandemic recovery policies. METHODS: We apply a qualitative comparative approach. Country case studies (expert information, secondary sources) were collected in March/April 2022. The sample comprised Australia, Brazil, Germany, United Kingdom and USA, reflecting conditions of high to upper-middle income countries with established public health systems, democratic political institutions and gender equality policies. Selected topics: maternity care/reproductive services, violence against women, and gender equality/female leadership. RESULTS: All countries tried to keep essential maternity and reproductive services open, but strong limitations applied especially for prevention and counselling services; at the same time, digitalisation/telemedicine supported service expansion. Violence against women and children strongly increased during the pandemic. Routine services were partly kept open and new helplines occasionally established, but no action was taken to scale-up mental health support and respond to new demand. A push-back of gender equality was observed across countries in all areas of health and social care, often coupled with strong increase in intersecting social inequalities; participation of women in decision-making bodies was generally weak and not monitored. CONCLUSIONS: Across countries, gender equality policies cracked under the pressure of the COVID-19 pandemic; this is true for countries with male and female political leaders, and for different areas of SDG5 and health. There is an urgent need for more effective intersectional gender equality policies and improved participation of women in global health and in health system recovery plans. KEY MESSAGES: • Health systems failed to take action to protect SDG5 goals; gender and intersecting inequalities strongly increased during the pandemic. • Building back better after COVID-19 will only be possible with an intersectional gender equality programme and feminist policy approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9620262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96202622022-11-04 SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment Kuhlmann, E Lotta, G Fernandez, M Herten-Crabb, A Maple, J-M MacFehr, L Paina, L Wenham, C Willis, K Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic caused severe disruptions in healthcare systems and societies and exacerbated existing inequalities for women and girls across every sphere. Our study explores health systems responses to gender equality goals during the COVID-19 pandemic and which role these goals play in pandemic recovery policies. METHODS: We apply a qualitative comparative approach. Country case studies (expert information, secondary sources) were collected in March/April 2022. The sample comprised Australia, Brazil, Germany, United Kingdom and USA, reflecting conditions of high to upper-middle income countries with established public health systems, democratic political institutions and gender equality policies. Selected topics: maternity care/reproductive services, violence against women, and gender equality/female leadership. RESULTS: All countries tried to keep essential maternity and reproductive services open, but strong limitations applied especially for prevention and counselling services; at the same time, digitalisation/telemedicine supported service expansion. Violence against women and children strongly increased during the pandemic. Routine services were partly kept open and new helplines occasionally established, but no action was taken to scale-up mental health support and respond to new demand. A push-back of gender equality was observed across countries in all areas of health and social care, often coupled with strong increase in intersecting social inequalities; participation of women in decision-making bodies was generally weak and not monitored. CONCLUSIONS: Across countries, gender equality policies cracked under the pressure of the COVID-19 pandemic; this is true for countries with male and female political leaders, and for different areas of SDG5 and health. There is an urgent need for more effective intersectional gender equality policies and improved participation of women in global health and in health system recovery plans. KEY MESSAGES: • Health systems failed to take action to protect SDG5 goals; gender and intersecting inequalities strongly increased during the pandemic. • Building back better after COVID-19 will only be possible with an intersectional gender equality programme and feminist policy approaches. Oxford University Press 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9620262/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.103 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Kuhlmann, E
Lotta, G
Fernandez, M
Herten-Crabb, A
Maple, J-M
MacFehr, L
Paina, L
Wenham, C
Willis, K
SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment
title SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment
title_full SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment
title_fullStr SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment
title_full_unstemmed SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment
title_short SDG5 Gender Equality during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment
title_sort sdg5 gender equality during the covid-19 pandemic: an international comparative policy assessment
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9620262/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.103
work_keys_str_mv AT kuhlmanne sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment
AT lottag sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment
AT fernandezm sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment
AT hertencrabba sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment
AT maplejm sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment
AT macfehrl sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment
AT painal sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment
AT wenhamc sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment
AT willisk sdg5genderequalityduringthecovid19pandemicaninternationalcomparativepolicyassessment