Cargando…
A research intelligence approach to assess the research impact of the Dutch university medical centres
BACKGROUND: The way in which research impact is evaluated and assessed has long been under debate. In recent years the focus is moving away from the use of numerical indicators, towards an emphasis on narratives. The Dutch university medical centres (UMCs) have a long-standing tradition of using bib...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9620620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00926-y |
_version_ | 1784821364356546560 |
---|---|
author | Iping, Rik Kroon, Marielle Steegers, Chantal van Leeuwen, Thed |
author_facet | Iping, Rik Kroon, Marielle Steegers, Chantal van Leeuwen, Thed |
author_sort | Iping, Rik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The way in which research impact is evaluated and assessed has long been under debate. In recent years the focus is moving away from the use of numerical indicators, towards an emphasis on narratives. The Dutch university medical centres (UMCs) have a long-standing tradition of using bibliometric indicators. Because of the declining interest in indicators alone, this study was designed to repurpose bibliometrics to answer specific strategic questions. In this article we discuss the strategic and policy-based questions, the methodology we used in uncovering relevant information and conclusions we draw from the analyses we performed. The aim of this article is to inform a broader audience about the potential applications of bibliometric information to support a new form of research intelligence. METHODS: In this study we used a curated set of publications from the UMCs. We performed different bibliometric analyses and used bibliometric visualization tools to shed light on research focus, open science practices, collaboration, societal impact and scientific impact. RESULTS: The analyses allowed us to visualize and contextualize the research focus of the UMCs as a whole, but also to show specific focus areas of each UMC. The UMCs are active in the full spectrum of biomedical research, and at the same time are very complementary to each other. Furthermore, we were able to show the development of open access of UMC publications over time, to support the national mission. Visualizing collaboration is a powerful way of showing both the international orientation and the regional and national engine function of UMCs in research. We were able to assess societal impact by looking at the different channels in which publications find their way to societally relevant sources such as news media, policy documents and guidelines. Finally, we assessed scientific impact and put this into an international perspective. CONCLUSIONS: Research intelligence is able to transform bibliometric information by interpretation and annotation into highly relevant insights that can be used for several different strategic purposes and for research impact assessment in general. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9620620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96206202022-11-01 A research intelligence approach to assess the research impact of the Dutch university medical centres Iping, Rik Kroon, Marielle Steegers, Chantal van Leeuwen, Thed Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: The way in which research impact is evaluated and assessed has long been under debate. In recent years the focus is moving away from the use of numerical indicators, towards an emphasis on narratives. The Dutch university medical centres (UMCs) have a long-standing tradition of using bibliometric indicators. Because of the declining interest in indicators alone, this study was designed to repurpose bibliometrics to answer specific strategic questions. In this article we discuss the strategic and policy-based questions, the methodology we used in uncovering relevant information and conclusions we draw from the analyses we performed. The aim of this article is to inform a broader audience about the potential applications of bibliometric information to support a new form of research intelligence. METHODS: In this study we used a curated set of publications from the UMCs. We performed different bibliometric analyses and used bibliometric visualization tools to shed light on research focus, open science practices, collaboration, societal impact and scientific impact. RESULTS: The analyses allowed us to visualize and contextualize the research focus of the UMCs as a whole, but also to show specific focus areas of each UMC. The UMCs are active in the full spectrum of biomedical research, and at the same time are very complementary to each other. Furthermore, we were able to show the development of open access of UMC publications over time, to support the national mission. Visualizing collaboration is a powerful way of showing both the international orientation and the regional and national engine function of UMCs in research. We were able to assess societal impact by looking at the different channels in which publications find their way to societally relevant sources such as news media, policy documents and guidelines. Finally, we assessed scientific impact and put this into an international perspective. CONCLUSIONS: Research intelligence is able to transform bibliometric information by interpretation and annotation into highly relevant insights that can be used for several different strategic purposes and for research impact assessment in general. BioMed Central 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9620620/ /pubmed/36316736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00926-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Iping, Rik Kroon, Marielle Steegers, Chantal van Leeuwen, Thed A research intelligence approach to assess the research impact of the Dutch university medical centres |
title | A research intelligence approach to assess the research impact of the Dutch university medical centres |
title_full | A research intelligence approach to assess the research impact of the Dutch university medical centres |
title_fullStr | A research intelligence approach to assess the research impact of the Dutch university medical centres |
title_full_unstemmed | A research intelligence approach to assess the research impact of the Dutch university medical centres |
title_short | A research intelligence approach to assess the research impact of the Dutch university medical centres |
title_sort | research intelligence approach to assess the research impact of the dutch university medical centres |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9620620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00926-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ipingrik aresearchintelligenceapproachtoassesstheresearchimpactofthedutchuniversitymedicalcentres AT kroonmarielle aresearchintelligenceapproachtoassesstheresearchimpactofthedutchuniversitymedicalcentres AT steegerschantal aresearchintelligenceapproachtoassesstheresearchimpactofthedutchuniversitymedicalcentres AT vanleeuwenthed aresearchintelligenceapproachtoassesstheresearchimpactofthedutchuniversitymedicalcentres AT ipingrik researchintelligenceapproachtoassesstheresearchimpactofthedutchuniversitymedicalcentres AT kroonmarielle researchintelligenceapproachtoassesstheresearchimpactofthedutchuniversitymedicalcentres AT steegerschantal researchintelligenceapproachtoassesstheresearchimpactofthedutchuniversitymedicalcentres AT vanleeuwenthed researchintelligenceapproachtoassesstheresearchimpactofthedutchuniversitymedicalcentres |